Integrating Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling-Based Forward Dosimetry and in Vitro Bioassays to Improve the Risk Assessment of Organophosphate Esters on Human Health

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Xiaolei Wang, Xiaoli Zhao*, Di Shi, Zhaomin Dong, Xiao Zhang, Weigang Liang, Lingling Liu, Xia Wang and Fengchang Wu, 
{"title":"Integrating Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling-Based Forward Dosimetry and in Vitro Bioassays to Improve the Risk Assessment of Organophosphate Esters on Human Health","authors":"Xiaolei Wang,&nbsp;Xiaoli Zhao*,&nbsp;Di Shi,&nbsp;Zhaomin Dong,&nbsp;Xiao Zhang,&nbsp;Weigang Liang,&nbsp;Lingling Liu,&nbsp;Xia Wang and Fengchang Wu,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.2c04576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The ability to accurately assess the health risks of contaminants is limited by the shortcomings of toxicological standards. Using organophosphate esters (OPEs) as an example, this study attempted to integrate physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK)-based forward dosimetry and in vitro bioassays to assess the likelihood of contaminants inducing biological effects in humans. The total exposure level of OPEs for Chinese residents was 19.5 ± 8.71 ng/kg/day with inhalation being the main exposure pathway. Then, human PBPK models were developed for individual OPEs to predict their steady-state concentrations in human tissues, and the predicted median levels in blood were close to the measurements. The reference doses (RfDs) of OPEs based on in vitro bioassays were comparable to in vivo animal-derived RfDs, demonstrating the reliability of in vitro bioassays. Therefore, the likelihood of OPEs inducing bioactivities in humans (RQ<sub>in-vitro</sub>) was calculated using in vitro toxicity data and OPE levels in human tissues. The RQ<sub>in-vitro</sub>s of tris(2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate, tris(1,3-dichloropropyl) phosphate, and triphenyl phosphate (7.68 × 10<sup>–5</sup>–3.18 × 10<sup>–3</sup>) were comparable to the risks assessed using traditional RfDs (5.22 × 10<sup>–5</sup>–1.94 × 10<sup>–3</sup>), indicating the credibility of the method proposed in this study. This study establishes a new framework to improve the health risk assessment of contaminants without sufficient toxicity data and minimize the need for animal experimentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"57 4","pages":"1764–1775"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.2c04576","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The ability to accurately assess the health risks of contaminants is limited by the shortcomings of toxicological standards. Using organophosphate esters (OPEs) as an example, this study attempted to integrate physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK)-based forward dosimetry and in vitro bioassays to assess the likelihood of contaminants inducing biological effects in humans. The total exposure level of OPEs for Chinese residents was 19.5 ± 8.71 ng/kg/day with inhalation being the main exposure pathway. Then, human PBPK models were developed for individual OPEs to predict their steady-state concentrations in human tissues, and the predicted median levels in blood were close to the measurements. The reference doses (RfDs) of OPEs based on in vitro bioassays were comparable to in vivo animal-derived RfDs, demonstrating the reliability of in vitro bioassays. Therefore, the likelihood of OPEs inducing bioactivities in humans (RQin-vitro) was calculated using in vitro toxicity data and OPE levels in human tissues. The RQin-vitros of tris(2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate, tris(1,3-dichloropropyl) phosphate, and triphenyl phosphate (7.68 × 10–5–3.18 × 10–3) were comparable to the risks assessed using traditional RfDs (5.22 × 10–5–1.94 × 10–3), indicating the credibility of the method proposed in this study. This study establishes a new framework to improve the health risk assessment of contaminants without sufficient toxicity data and minimize the need for animal experimentation.

Abstract Image

结合基于生理学的药代动力学模型的正向剂量学和体外生物测定来改进有机磷酸酯对人体健康的风险评估
毒物学标准的缺陷限制了准确评估污染物健康风险的能力。以有机磷酸酯(OPEs)为例,本研究试图将基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)的正向剂量学和体外生物测定相结合,以评估污染物对人体产生生物效应的可能性。中国居民OPEs总暴露水平为19.5±8.71 ng/kg/d,吸入为主要暴露途径。然后,针对个体OPEs建立了人体PBPK模型,以预测其在人体组织中的稳态浓度,预测的血液中位数水平与测量值接近。基于体外生物测定的OPEs参考剂量(rfd)与体内动物源性rfd相当,证明了体外生物测定的可靠性。因此,利用体外毒性数据和人体组织中的OPE水平,计算了OPEs诱导人体内生物活性(r秦体外)的可能性。磷酸三酯(2-氯异丙基)、磷酸三酯(1,3-二氯丙基)和磷酸三苯酯(7.68 × 10-5-3.18 × 10-3)的r秦体外风险与传统rdf评估的风险(5.22 × 10-5-1.94 × 10-3)相当,表明本研究方法的可信度。本研究建立了一个新的框架,可以在没有足够毒性数据的情况下改进污染物的健康风险评估,并最大限度地减少对动物实验的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信