Narcissism and the perception of failure - evidence from the error-related negativity and the error positivity.

Q3 Medicine
Markus Mück, André Mattes, Elisa Porth, Jutta Stahl
{"title":"Narcissism and the perception of failure - evidence from the error-related negativity and the error positivity.","authors":"Markus Mück,&nbsp;André Mattes,&nbsp;Elisa Porth,&nbsp;Jutta Stahl","doi":"10.1017/pen.2022.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The literature on narcissism suggests two contradictory ways how highly narcissistic individuals deal with their failures: They might avoid consciously recognising their failures to protect their ego or they might vigilantly turn towards their failures to process cues that are important for maintaining their grandiosity. We tried to dissolve these contradictory positions by studying event-related potential components of error processing and their variations with narcissism. With a speeded go/no-go task, we examined how the error-related negativity (Ne; reflecting an early, automatic processing stage) and the error positivity (Pe; associated with conscious error detection) vary with Admiration and Rivalry, two narcissism dimensions, under ego-threatening conditions. Using multilevel models, we showed that participants with high Rivalry displayed higher Ne amplitudes suggesting a heightened trait of defensive reactivity. We did not find variations of either narcissism dimension with the Pe, which would have pointed to weaker error awareness. Thus, our results only supported the second position: a heightened vigilance to errors in narcissism at early, rather automatic processing stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":"6 ","pages":"e2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947629/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2022.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The literature on narcissism suggests two contradictory ways how highly narcissistic individuals deal with their failures: They might avoid consciously recognising their failures to protect their ego or they might vigilantly turn towards their failures to process cues that are important for maintaining their grandiosity. We tried to dissolve these contradictory positions by studying event-related potential components of error processing and their variations with narcissism. With a speeded go/no-go task, we examined how the error-related negativity (Ne; reflecting an early, automatic processing stage) and the error positivity (Pe; associated with conscious error detection) vary with Admiration and Rivalry, two narcissism dimensions, under ego-threatening conditions. Using multilevel models, we showed that participants with high Rivalry displayed higher Ne amplitudes suggesting a heightened trait of defensive reactivity. We did not find variations of either narcissism dimension with the Pe, which would have pointed to weaker error awareness. Thus, our results only supported the second position: a heightened vigilance to errors in narcissism at early, rather automatic processing stages.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自恋和对失败的感知——来自与错误相关的消极和错误积极的证据。
关于自恋的文献表明,高度自恋的人处理失败的两种相互矛盾的方式:他们可能会避免有意识地承认自己的失败,以保护自己的自我,或者他们可能会警惕地转向自己的失败,以处理对维持自己的浮夸很重要的线索。我们试图通过研究错误处理的事件相关潜在成分及其随自恋的变化来化解这些矛盾的立场。通过快速执行/不执行任务,我们研究了与错误相关的消极性(Ne;反映了早期的自动处理阶段)和误差正性(Pe;在自我威胁条件下,钦佩和竞争是自恋的两个维度。利用多层次模型,我们发现高度竞争的参与者表现出更高的Ne振幅,表明防御反应的特征增强。我们没有发现任何自恋维度与Pe的变化,这将表明较弱的错误意识。因此,我们的研究结果只支持第二种观点:在自恋的早期,而不是自动处理阶段,对错误的高度警惕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信