Standardization of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques by Calibration and Quantification to the First WHO International Standard for SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

IF 2.8 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Jolanda J C Voermans, Daphne G J C Mulders, Rob J J Beerkens, Marlize van Duijn, Liesbeth van der Zwaan, Janette Rahamat-Langendoen, Annemiek van der Eijk, Marion P G Koopmans, Richard Molenkamp
{"title":"Standardization of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques by Calibration and Quantification to the First WHO International Standard for SARS-CoV-2 RNA.","authors":"Jolanda J C Voermans,&nbsp;Daphne G J C Mulders,&nbsp;Rob J J Beerkens,&nbsp;Marlize van Duijn,&nbsp;Liesbeth van der Zwaan,&nbsp;Janette Rahamat-Langendoen,&nbsp;Annemiek van der Eijk,&nbsp;Marion P G Koopmans,&nbsp;Richard Molenkamp","doi":"10.1155/2023/7803864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical decision-making regarding isolation of SARS-CoV-2 patients is usually based on semiquantitative cycle-threshold (Ct) values without standardization. However, not all molecular assays produce Ct values, and there is ongoing discussion about whether Ct values can be safely used for decision-making. In this study, we standardized two molecular assays which use different nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAAT): the Hologic Aptima SARS-CoV-2/Flu (TMA) and Roche Cobas 6800 SARS-CoV-2 assays. We calibrated these assays against the first WHO international standard for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by using linear regression of log10 dilution series. These calibration curves were used to calculate viral loads for clinical samples. Clinical performance was assessed retrospectively using samples collected between January 2020 and November 2021, including known positives of the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 virus, the VOCs (alpha, beta, gamma, delta, and omicron) and quality control panels. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis showed good correlations for SARS-CoV-2 between Panther TMA and Cobas 6800 when standardized viral loads were used. These standardized quantitative results can benefit clinical decision-making and standardization of infection control guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":14098,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957646/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7803864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Clinical decision-making regarding isolation of SARS-CoV-2 patients is usually based on semiquantitative cycle-threshold (Ct) values without standardization. However, not all molecular assays produce Ct values, and there is ongoing discussion about whether Ct values can be safely used for decision-making. In this study, we standardized two molecular assays which use different nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAAT): the Hologic Aptima SARS-CoV-2/Flu (TMA) and Roche Cobas 6800 SARS-CoV-2 assays. We calibrated these assays against the first WHO international standard for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by using linear regression of log10 dilution series. These calibration curves were used to calculate viral loads for clinical samples. Clinical performance was assessed retrospectively using samples collected between January 2020 and November 2021, including known positives of the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 virus, the VOCs (alpha, beta, gamma, delta, and omicron) and quality control panels. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis showed good correlations for SARS-CoV-2 between Panther TMA and Cobas 6800 when standardized viral loads were used. These standardized quantitative results can benefit clinical decision-making and standardization of infection control guidelines.

Abstract Image

按世界卫生组织首个SARS-CoV-2 RNA国际标准进行SARS-CoV-2核酸扩增技术的校准和定量标准化
临床对SARS-CoV-2患者的隔离决策通常基于半定量周期阈值(Ct),没有标准化。然而,并不是所有的分子测定都能产生Ct值,关于Ct值是否可以安全地用于决策的讨论正在进行中。在本研究中,我们标准化了使用不同核酸扩增技术(NAAT)的两种分子检测方法:Hologic Aptima SARS-CoV-2/Flu (TMA)和Roche Cobas 6800 SARS-CoV-2检测方法。我们使用log10稀释系列线性回归,根据世卫组织首个SARS-CoV-2 RNA国际标准对这些检测进行校准。这些校准曲线用于计算临床样品的病毒载量。回顾性评估临床表现,使用2020年1月至2021年11月期间收集的样本,包括已知的野生型SARS-CoV-2病毒阳性、挥发性有机化合物(α、β、γ、δ和欧米克隆)和质量控制面板。线性回归和Bland-Altman分析显示,当使用标准化病毒载量时,Panther TMA与Cobas 6800之间的SARS-CoV-2具有良好的相关性。这些标准化的定量结果有利于临床决策和感染控制指南的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Microbiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies on microorganisms and their interaction with hosts and the environment. The journal covers all microbes, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, archaea, and protozoa. Basic science will be considered, as well as medical and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信