Endoscopic management of buried bumper syndrome using the Balloon Dilation Pull (BDP) technique: a multicenter analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
M Maly, M Bronswijk, P Christiaens, C Snauwaert
{"title":"Endoscopic management of buried bumper syndrome using the Balloon Dilation Pull (BDP) technique: a multicenter analysis.","authors":"M Maly,&nbsp;M Bronswijk,&nbsp;P Christiaens,&nbsp;C Snauwaert","doi":"10.51821/86.1.11005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Buried bumper syndrome (BBS) may complicate percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. In these patients, endoscopic treatment ought to be considered. Various approaches have been published, ranging from dissectionbased techniques to novel dedicated devices, although the evidence supporting the use of the Balloon Dilation Pull (BDP) technique has been limited to single case reports. The aim of this paper is to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of the systematic use of the BDPtechnique for the endoscopic treatment of BBS.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis of prospectively collected data from all patients treated with the BDP-technique between January 2011 and November 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 26 patients were identified (median age 72 (SD ± 13) years, 74% male, 84.6% underlying neurological disease). Technical success was achieved in 92.3%, with a median procedure time of 17.5 minutes (range 5-27). Adverse events were identified in 3.8% of patients (N=1, aspiration, ASGE lexicon severity grade: moderate).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our experience suggests that the BDP-technique is highly efficacious and safe, using accessories readily available in every endoscopic unit. Given the limited procedure time and tools required, this procedure has the potential to further optimize patient care in the context of BBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":7322,"journal":{"name":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51821/86.1.11005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Buried bumper syndrome (BBS) may complicate percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. In these patients, endoscopic treatment ought to be considered. Various approaches have been published, ranging from dissectionbased techniques to novel dedicated devices, although the evidence supporting the use of the Balloon Dilation Pull (BDP) technique has been limited to single case reports. The aim of this paper is to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of the systematic use of the BDPtechnique for the endoscopic treatment of BBS.

Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis of prospectively collected data from all patients treated with the BDP-technique between January 2011 and November 2021.

Results: In total, 26 patients were identified (median age 72 (SD ± 13) years, 74% male, 84.6% underlying neurological disease). Technical success was achieved in 92.3%, with a median procedure time of 17.5 minutes (range 5-27). Adverse events were identified in 3.8% of patients (N=1, aspiration, ASGE lexicon severity grade: moderate).

Conclusions: Our experience suggests that the BDP-technique is highly efficacious and safe, using accessories readily available in every endoscopic unit. Given the limited procedure time and tools required, this procedure has the potential to further optimize patient care in the context of BBS.

内镜下使用球囊扩张拉(BDP)技术治疗隐匿性缓冲器综合征:一项多中心分析。
背景和研究目的:埋藏缓冲器综合征(BBS)可能使经皮内镜胃造口术置入复杂化。对于这些患者,应考虑内窥镜治疗。尽管支持使用球囊扩张拉(BDP)技术的证据仅限于单个病例报告,但已经发表了各种方法,从基于解剖的技术到新型专用设备。本文的目的是评估系统使用bdp技术在内镜下治疗BBS的可行性、有效性和安全性。患者和方法:我们对2011年1月至2021年11月期间接受bdp技术治疗的所有患者前瞻性收集的数据进行了回顾性多中心分析。结果:共发现26例患者(中位年龄72 (SD±13)岁,男性占74%,基础神经系统疾病占84.6%)。技术成功率为92.3%,中位手术时间为17.5分钟(范围5-27分钟)。不良事件发生在3.8%的患者中(N=1,误吸,ASGE词汇严重等级:中度)。结论:我们的经验表明,bdp技术是非常有效和安全的,每个内镜单元都可以使用现成的附件。鉴于手术时间和所需工具有限,该手术具有进一步优化BBS患者护理的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Journal Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica principally publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts, reviews, letters to editors, book reviews and guidelines in the field of clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, including digestive oncology, digestive pathology, as well as nutrition. Pure animal or in vitro work will not be considered for publication in the Journal. Translational research papers (including sections of animal or in vitro work) are considered by the Journal if they have a clear relationship to or relevance for clinical hepato-gastroenterology (screening, disease mechanisms and/or new therapies). Case reports and clinical images will be accepted if they represent an important contribution to the description, the pathogenesis or the treatment of a specific gastroenterology or liver problem. The language of the Journal is English. Papers from any country will be considered for publication. Manuscripts submitted to the Journal should not have been published previously (in English or any other language), nor should they be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Unsolicited papers are peer-reviewed before it is decided whether they should be accepted, rejected, or returned for revision. Manuscripts that do not meet the presentation criteria (as indicated below) will be returned to the authors. Papers that go too far beyond the scope of the journal will be also returned to the authors by the editorial board generally within 2 weeks. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, and to make formal changes to ensure compliance with AGEB’s style. Authors have the opportunity to review such changes in the proofs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信