Oral contraceptive use and menstrual cycle influence acute cerebrovascular response to standing

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
C. Barranca , T.J. Pereira , H. Edgell
{"title":"Oral contraceptive use and menstrual cycle influence acute cerebrovascular response to standing","authors":"C. Barranca ,&nbsp;T.J. Pereira ,&nbsp;H. Edgell","doi":"10.1016/j.autneu.2022.103054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><span>To determine if the menstrual cycle<span> and oral contraceptives (OC) influence responses to acute </span></span>orthostatic stress<span> and if these factors are clinically relevant to the diagnosis of initial orthostatic hypotension (iOH).</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Young, healthy women were recruited, including OC users (n = 12) and non-users (NOC; n = 9). Women were tested during the low hormone (LH; placebo<span> pills; days 2–5 natural cycle) and high hormone (HH; active dose; days 18–24 natural cycle) menstrual phases. Changes in mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, heart rate, the 30:15 heart rate ratio and cerebrovascular resistance indices within 30 s of standing were examined.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>There were no effects of OC or menstrual cycle on hemodynamic responses during standing (all p&gt;0.05). In the LH phase, OC users had a greater fall in mean </span>middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCA</span><sub>V</sub>) compared to NOC (p&lt;0.05). However, this was reversed in the HH phase, where OC users had a reduced fall in mean MCA<sub>V</sub> (p&lt;0.05). Interestingly, 8 women (OC and NOC) had drops in systolic/diastolic blood pressure meeting the criteria for iOH, and 7 of those 8 women displayed this drop in a single phase of the menstrual cycle.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results indicate that chronic versus acute OC use (i.e., long-term use observed via LH phase versus short-term use observed via HH phase) have opposing effects on cerebral blood velocity during standing. Further, our results highlight that multiple assessments across the cycle may be necessary to accurately diagnose iOH, as most women met the diagnostic criteria during a single menstrual phase.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55410,"journal":{"name":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 103054"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566070222001138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose

To determine if the menstrual cycle and oral contraceptives (OC) influence responses to acute orthostatic stress and if these factors are clinically relevant to the diagnosis of initial orthostatic hypotension (iOH).

Methods

Young, healthy women were recruited, including OC users (n = 12) and non-users (NOC; n = 9). Women were tested during the low hormone (LH; placebo pills; days 2–5 natural cycle) and high hormone (HH; active dose; days 18–24 natural cycle) menstrual phases. Changes in mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, heart rate, the 30:15 heart rate ratio and cerebrovascular resistance indices within 30 s of standing were examined.

Results

There were no effects of OC or menstrual cycle on hemodynamic responses during standing (all p>0.05). In the LH phase, OC users had a greater fall in mean middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAV) compared to NOC (p<0.05). However, this was reversed in the HH phase, where OC users had a reduced fall in mean MCAV (p<0.05). Interestingly, 8 women (OC and NOC) had drops in systolic/diastolic blood pressure meeting the criteria for iOH, and 7 of those 8 women displayed this drop in a single phase of the menstrual cycle.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that chronic versus acute OC use (i.e., long-term use observed via LH phase versus short-term use observed via HH phase) have opposing effects on cerebral blood velocity during standing. Further, our results highlight that multiple assessments across the cycle may be necessary to accurately diagnose iOH, as most women met the diagnostic criteria during a single menstrual phase.

口服避孕药的使用和月经周期影响站立时急性脑血管反应
目的确定月经周期和口服避孕药(OC)是否影响对急性直立性应激的反应,以及这些因素是否与初始直立性低血压(iOH)的诊断具有临床相关性。方法招募年轻健康女性,包括OC使用者(n=12)和非使用者(NOC;n=9)。女性在低激素(LH;安慰剂;2-5天自然周期)和高激素(HH;有效剂量;18-24天自然循环)月经期接受测试。观察站立30s内平均动脉压、心输出量、心率、30:15心率比和脑血管阻力指数的变化。结果OC或月经周期对站立期间的血液动力学反应没有影响(均p>;0.05)。在LH期,OC使用者的平均大脑中动脉血流速度(MCAV)比NOC(p<;0.05)下降得更大。然而,在HH期,这一情况发生了逆转,OC使用者平均MCAV下降得更少(p<)。有趣的是,8名女性(OC和NOC)的收缩压/舒张压下降符合iOH标准,其中7名女性在月经周期的单一阶段出现这种下降。结论我们的研究结果表明,长期使用OC与急性使用OC(即通过LH期观察到的长期使用与通过HH期观测到的短期使用)对站立期间的脑血流速度有相反的影响。此外,我们的研究结果强调,为了准确诊断iOH,整个周期的多次评估可能是必要的,因为大多数女性在单个月经期都符合诊断标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: This is an international journal with broad coverage of all aspects of the autonomic nervous system in man and animals. The main areas of interest include the innervation of blood vessels and viscera, autonomic ganglia, efferent and afferent autonomic pathways, and autonomic nuclei and pathways in the central nervous system. The Editors will consider papers that deal with any aspect of the autonomic nervous system, including structure, physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, development, evolution, ageing, behavioural aspects, integrative role and influence on emotional and physical states of the body. Interdisciplinary studies will be encouraged. Studies dealing with human pathology will be also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信