Karen Peynshaert, Joke Devoldere, Stefaan De Smedt, Katrien Remaut
{"title":"Every nano-step counts: a critical reflection on do's and don'ts in researching nanomedicines for retinal gene therapy.","authors":"Karen Peynshaert, Joke Devoldere, Stefaan De Smedt, Katrien Remaut","doi":"10.1080/17425247.2023.2167979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retinal disease affects millions of people worldwide, generating a massive social and economic burden. Current clinical trials for retinal diseases are dominated by gene augmentation therapies delivered with recombinant viruses as key players. As an alternative, nanoparticles hold great promise for the delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics as well. Nevertheless, despite numerous attempts, 'nano' is in practice not as successful as aspired and major breakthroughs in retinal gene therapy applying nanomaterials are yet to be seen.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this review, we summarize the advantages of nanomaterials and give an overview of nanoparticles designed for retinal nucleic acid delivery up to now. We furthermore critically reflect on the predominant issues that currently limit nano to progress to the clinic, where faulty study design and the absence of representative models play key roles.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Since the current approach of <i>in vitro</i> - <i>in vivo</i> experimentation is highly inefficient and creates misinformation, we advocate for a more prominent role for <i>ex vivo</i> testing early on in nanoparticle research. In addition, we elaborate on several concepts, including systematic studies and open science, which could aid in pushing the field of nanomedicine beyond the preclinical stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":12229,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery","volume":"20 2","pages":"259-271"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2023.2167979","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Retinal disease affects millions of people worldwide, generating a massive social and economic burden. Current clinical trials for retinal diseases are dominated by gene augmentation therapies delivered with recombinant viruses as key players. As an alternative, nanoparticles hold great promise for the delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics as well. Nevertheless, despite numerous attempts, 'nano' is in practice not as successful as aspired and major breakthroughs in retinal gene therapy applying nanomaterials are yet to be seen.
Areas covered: In this review, we summarize the advantages of nanomaterials and give an overview of nanoparticles designed for retinal nucleic acid delivery up to now. We furthermore critically reflect on the predominant issues that currently limit nano to progress to the clinic, where faulty study design and the absence of representative models play key roles.
Expert opinion: Since the current approach of in vitro - in vivo experimentation is highly inefficient and creates misinformation, we advocate for a more prominent role for ex vivo testing early on in nanoparticle research. In addition, we elaborate on several concepts, including systematic studies and open science, which could aid in pushing the field of nanomedicine beyond the preclinical stage.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery (ISSN 1742-5247 [print], 1744-7593 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles covering all aspects of drug delivery research, from initial concept to potential therapeutic application and final relevance in clinical use. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development.