Shear wave elastography ultrasound does not quantify mechanical properties of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Ultrasound Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-15 DOI:10.1007/s40477-022-00768-y
Alan W Reynolds, David Jordan, Patrick J Schimoler, Patrick J DeMeo, Bethany Casagranda, William M Peterson, Mark C Miller
{"title":"Shear wave elastography ultrasound does not quantify mechanical properties of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow.","authors":"Alan W Reynolds, David Jordan, Patrick J Schimoler, Patrick J DeMeo, Bethany Casagranda, William M Peterson, Mark C Miller","doi":"10.1007/s40477-022-00768-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate shear wave elastography (SWE) stiffness measurements for the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow compared to mechanical measurements.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eleven fresh frozen human cadaveric upper extremities were evaluated by a musculoskeletal-specialized radiologist to provide SWE measurements used to calculate stiffness at 4 points along the anterior band of the UCL at various load states and flexion angles. Specimens were then dissected and optical markers were placed on the UCL to track displacement during applied force by a load frame, thereby providing measurements to calculate the mechanical stiffness. These two stiffness values were compared by ANOVA for all load states and flexion angles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Measurements of stiffness by SWE for the UCL were three orders of magnitude smaller than the true mechanical testing stiffness and no correlations between SWE and mechanical measurements of stiffness were found at 30, 60 or 90 degrees of elbow flexion (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.004, p = 0.85; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.001, p = 0.92; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.15, p = 0.24 respectively). SWE stiffness was greatest near the insertion of the ligament and lowest in the mid-substance of the ligament (p = 0.0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SWE stiffness did not correlate with mechanical measurements. Clinical utility of musculoskeletal SWE may be better defined when biomechanical properties or clinical outcomes can be correlated with SWE measurements. The ultimate clinical utility of SWE in musculoskeletal tissues may be qualitative, as demonstrated by differences throughout the length of the UCL in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11333415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-022-00768-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To validate shear wave elastography (SWE) stiffness measurements for the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow compared to mechanical measurements.

Materials and methods: Eleven fresh frozen human cadaveric upper extremities were evaluated by a musculoskeletal-specialized radiologist to provide SWE measurements used to calculate stiffness at 4 points along the anterior band of the UCL at various load states and flexion angles. Specimens were then dissected and optical markers were placed on the UCL to track displacement during applied force by a load frame, thereby providing measurements to calculate the mechanical stiffness. These two stiffness values were compared by ANOVA for all load states and flexion angles.

Results: Measurements of stiffness by SWE for the UCL were three orders of magnitude smaller than the true mechanical testing stiffness and no correlations between SWE and mechanical measurements of stiffness were found at 30, 60 or 90 degrees of elbow flexion (R2 = 0.004, p = 0.85; R2 = 0.001, p = 0.92; R2 = 0.15, p = 0.24 respectively). SWE stiffness was greatest near the insertion of the ligament and lowest in the mid-substance of the ligament (p = 0.0002).

Conclusions: SWE stiffness did not correlate with mechanical measurements. Clinical utility of musculoskeletal SWE may be better defined when biomechanical properties or clinical outcomes can be correlated with SWE measurements. The ultimate clinical utility of SWE in musculoskeletal tissues may be qualitative, as demonstrated by differences throughout the length of the UCL in this study.

剪切波弹性成像超声波无法量化肘部尺侧副韧带的机械特性。
目的:验证剪切波弹性成像(SWE)与机械测量法对肘部尺侧韧带(UCL)硬度的测量结果:与机械测量方法相比,验证剪切波弹性成像(SWE)对肘部尺侧副韧带(UCL)硬度的测量结果:由肌肉骨骼专业放射科医生对 11 例新鲜冷冻人体尸体上肢进行评估,以提供用于计算不同负荷状态和屈曲角度下尺侧副韧带前带 4 个点刚度的 SWE 测量值。然后对标本进行解剖,并在 UCL 上放置光学标记,以跟踪负载框架施加力时的位移,从而提供用于计算机械刚度的测量值。通过方差分析对所有负载状态和屈曲角度下的这两个刚度值进行比较:肘关节屈曲 30 度、60 度或 90 度时,SWE 测量的 UCL 刚度比真实的机械测试刚度小三个数量级,且 SWE 与机械测量的刚度之间没有相关性(分别为 R2 = 0.004,p = 0.85;R2 = 0.001,p = 0.92;R2 = 0.15,p = 0.24)。SWE硬度在韧带插入处附近最大,在韧带中段最低(p = 0.0002):结论:SWE 硬度与力学测量结果不相关。当生物力学特性或临床结果与 SWE 测量值相关联时,肌肉骨骼 SWE 的临床实用性可能会得到更好的界定。SWE 在肌肉骨骼组织中的最终临床应用可能是定性的,本研究中 UCL 整个长度上的差异就证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信