Effects of a Rehabilitation Program Combined with Pain Management That Targets Pain Perception and Activity Avoidance in Older Patients with Acute Vertebral Compression Fracture: a Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hideki Kataoka, Tatsuya Hirase, Kyo Goto, Yutaro Nomoto, Yutaro Kondo, Koichi Nakagawa, Junichiro Yamashita, Kaoru Morita, Yuichiro Honda, Junya Sakamoto, Minoru Okita
{"title":"Effects of a Rehabilitation Program Combined with Pain Management That Targets Pain Perception and Activity Avoidance in Older Patients with Acute Vertebral Compression Fracture: a Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Hideki Kataoka,&nbsp;Tatsuya Hirase,&nbsp;Kyo Goto,&nbsp;Yutaro Nomoto,&nbsp;Yutaro Kondo,&nbsp;Koichi Nakagawa,&nbsp;Junichiro Yamashita,&nbsp;Kaoru Morita,&nbsp;Yuichiro Honda,&nbsp;Junya Sakamoto,&nbsp;Minoru Okita","doi":"10.1155/2023/1383897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the effect of a rehabilitation program combined with pain management targeting pain perception and activity avoidance on multifaceted outcomes in older patients with acute vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). We randomised 65 older adults with acute VCFs to either an intervention group (<i>n</i> = 32), involving usual rehabilitation combined with pain management that targeted pain perception and activity avoidance, or a control group (<i>n</i> = 33), involving only usual rehabilitation. The usual rehabilitation was initiated immediately after admission. All patients were treated conservatively. Pain management aimed to improve the patients' daily behaviour by increasing their daily activities despite pain, rather than by focusing on eliminating the pain. Pain intensity and psychological statuses such as depression, pain catastrophising, and physical activity levels were assessed on admission. Two weeks postadmission and at discharge, physical performance measures were assessed along with the above-given measurements. A significant main effect of the group was observed for the intensity of lower back pain, favouring the intervention group (<i>F</i> = 5.135, <i>p</i> = 0.027). At discharge, it was significantly better in the intervention group than in the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.011). A time-by-group interaction emerged for magnification of the pain catastrophising scale (<i>p</i> = 0.012), physical activity levels (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and six-minute walking distance (<i>p</i> = 0.006), all favouring the intervention group. Rehabilitation programs combined with pain management targeting pain perception and activity avoidance could be an effective conservative treatment for older patients with acute VCFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1383897","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of a rehabilitation program combined with pain management targeting pain perception and activity avoidance on multifaceted outcomes in older patients with acute vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). We randomised 65 older adults with acute VCFs to either an intervention group (n = 32), involving usual rehabilitation combined with pain management that targeted pain perception and activity avoidance, or a control group (n = 33), involving only usual rehabilitation. The usual rehabilitation was initiated immediately after admission. All patients were treated conservatively. Pain management aimed to improve the patients' daily behaviour by increasing their daily activities despite pain, rather than by focusing on eliminating the pain. Pain intensity and psychological statuses such as depression, pain catastrophising, and physical activity levels were assessed on admission. Two weeks postadmission and at discharge, physical performance measures were assessed along with the above-given measurements. A significant main effect of the group was observed for the intensity of lower back pain, favouring the intervention group (F = 5.135, p = 0.027). At discharge, it was significantly better in the intervention group than in the control group (p = 0.011). A time-by-group interaction emerged for magnification of the pain catastrophising scale (p = 0.012), physical activity levels (p < 0.001), and six-minute walking distance (p = 0.006), all favouring the intervention group. Rehabilitation programs combined with pain management targeting pain perception and activity avoidance could be an effective conservative treatment for older patients with acute VCFs.

Abstract Image

针对老年急性椎体压缩性骨折患者疼痛感知和活动回避的康复计划与疼痛管理相结合的效果:一项随机对照试验
本研究旨在探讨针对疼痛感知和活动回避的康复方案结合疼痛管理对老年急性椎体压缩性骨折(vcf)患者多方面预后的影响。我们将65名患有急性vcf的老年人随机分为干预组(n = 32)和对照组(n = 33),干预组包括常规康复和针对疼痛感知和活动避免的疼痛管理,对照组只包括常规康复。入院后立即进行常规康复治疗。所有患者均采用保守治疗。疼痛管理旨在通过增加患者的日常活动来改善他们的日常行为,而不是专注于消除疼痛。入院时评估疼痛强度和心理状态,如抑郁、疼痛灾难和身体活动水平。入院后两周和出院时,身体表现测量与上述测量一起进行评估。干预组对腰痛强度有显著的主效应,对干预组有利(F = 5.135, p = 0.027)。出院时,干预组明显优于对照组(p = 0.011)。在疼痛灾难化量表(p = 0.012)、体力活动水平(p < 0.001)和6分钟步行距离(p = 0.006)的放大上,出现了按时间分组的相互作用,这些都有利于干预组。康复方案结合疼痛管理,针对疼痛感知和活动避免可能是有效的保守治疗老年急性vcf患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信