Epidural Blood Patch in a Patient with a Hematological Malignancy.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ross Barman, Jack McHugh, Thomas O'Mara, Thomas Pittelkow, Ryan S D'Souza
{"title":"Epidural Blood Patch in a Patient with a Hematological Malignancy.","authors":"Ross Barman,&nbsp;Jack McHugh,&nbsp;Thomas O'Mara,&nbsp;Thomas Pittelkow,&nbsp;Ryan S D'Souza","doi":"10.1155/2023/9955772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postdural puncture headache is a frequently encountered complication following procedures such as lumbar puncture, neuraxial anesthesia, or intrathecal drug delivery device implantation. It classically presents as a painful orthostatic headache that is exacerbated when a patient is upright. For treatment, patients are often started on conservative options such as hydration, caffeine, bedrest, and NSAID analgesics; however, certain patients who fail these therapies may require intervention with an epidural blood patch. The epidural blood patch remains the gold standard for treating refractory postdural puncture headache. Contraindications to epidural blood patch include severe coagulopathy, patient refusal, or infection at the intended site of entry. There are no clear consensus recommendations regarding patients with a hematological malignancy and potential risk that autologous blood may seed malignant cells into the neuraxis. In this case report, we present a patient with acute myeloid leukemia who developed a postdural puncture headache after receiving subarachnoid administration of antineoplastics. The patient was refractory to conservative therapy, prompting multidisciplinary consultation and discussion with the patient about the risks and benefits of proceeding with an epidural blood patch. Ultimately, the patient elected to proceed with the offered epidural blood patch which led to complete resolution of his painful headaches and did not cause any spread of malignant cells into his neuraxis or cerebral spinal fluid.</p>","PeriodicalId":9627,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Medicine","volume":"2023 ","pages":"9955772"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9937747/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9955772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Postdural puncture headache is a frequently encountered complication following procedures such as lumbar puncture, neuraxial anesthesia, or intrathecal drug delivery device implantation. It classically presents as a painful orthostatic headache that is exacerbated when a patient is upright. For treatment, patients are often started on conservative options such as hydration, caffeine, bedrest, and NSAID analgesics; however, certain patients who fail these therapies may require intervention with an epidural blood patch. The epidural blood patch remains the gold standard for treating refractory postdural puncture headache. Contraindications to epidural blood patch include severe coagulopathy, patient refusal, or infection at the intended site of entry. There are no clear consensus recommendations regarding patients with a hematological malignancy and potential risk that autologous blood may seed malignant cells into the neuraxis. In this case report, we present a patient with acute myeloid leukemia who developed a postdural puncture headache after receiving subarachnoid administration of antineoplastics. The patient was refractory to conservative therapy, prompting multidisciplinary consultation and discussion with the patient about the risks and benefits of proceeding with an epidural blood patch. Ultimately, the patient elected to proceed with the offered epidural blood patch which led to complete resolution of his painful headaches and did not cause any spread of malignant cells into his neuraxis or cerebral spinal fluid.

Abstract Image

恶性血液病患者的硬膜外补血。
硬脊膜穿刺后头痛是腰椎穿刺、神经轴麻醉或鞘内给药装置植入等手术后常见的并发症。它典型地表现为疼痛的直立性头痛,当患者直立时加剧。对于治疗,患者通常开始使用保守的选择,如水合作用、咖啡因、卧床治疗和非甾体抗炎药止痛剂;然而,某些治疗失败的患者可能需要使用硬膜外血液贴片进行干预。硬膜外血贴仍然是治疗顽固性硬膜穿刺后头痛的金标准。硬膜外血液贴片的禁忌症包括严重凝血功能障碍、患者拒绝或预期进入部位感染。对于血液学恶性肿瘤患者和自体血液可能将恶性细胞植入神经轴的潜在风险,目前还没有明确的共识建议。在这个病例报告中,我们提出了一个急性髓性白血病患者,他在接受蛛网膜下抗肿瘤药物治疗后出现硬脊膜穿刺头痛。患者对保守治疗难治性,促使多学科会诊并与患者讨论硬膜外血贴的风险和益处。最终,患者选择继续硬膜外血液贴片治疗,这使他的头痛完全消失,并且没有引起任何恶性细胞扩散到他的神经轴或脑脊液中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Case Reports in Medicine
Case Reports in Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信