Unethical US Government-Funded Cervical Screening Study in India: US Freedom of Information Act Disclosures.

Eric J Suba, Robert E Ortega, David G Mutch
{"title":"Unethical US Government-Funded Cervical Screening Study in India: US Freedom of Information Act Disclosures.","authors":"Eric J Suba,&nbsp;Robert E Ortega,&nbsp;David G Mutch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Documents obtained through the US Freedom of Information Act show that, in 1997, the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) funded an 18-year randomized controlled trial in Mumbai that used mortality endpoints to compare a discredited cervical screening test to no screening. The Mumbai trial required Indian and global health leaders to assume \"no screening\" would remain \"standard care\" throughout India for the duration of the trial, and thereby delayed the implementation of routine cervical screening among the general population of India for 18 years. During those 18 years, more than one million women died from cervical cancer in India, while Pap screening became \"standard care\" in other developing countries. Incorrect beliefs that Pap screening is not feasible in developing countries provide false justification for opportunity costs associated with the Mumbai trial and hinder cervical cancer prevention efforts in developing countries, where 90% of global cervical cancer deaths occur. Those incorrect beliefs also undermine World Health Organization policy guidelines, which should be corrected to acknowledge that good-quality Pap screening can be implemented in developing countries with reasonable investment. Tata Memorial Hospital and the US Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) determined the Mumbai trial was unethical. That determination has been effectively covered up by false and misleading statements from US medical leaders. All surviving Mumbai trial participants, from both intervention and control arms, should finally receive good-quality cervical screening tests. NCI leaders should accept OHRP determinations, acknowledge the Mumbai trial was unethical, and apologize to trial participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":73773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930483/pdf/jhsh-8-57.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Documents obtained through the US Freedom of Information Act show that, in 1997, the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) funded an 18-year randomized controlled trial in Mumbai that used mortality endpoints to compare a discredited cervical screening test to no screening. The Mumbai trial required Indian and global health leaders to assume "no screening" would remain "standard care" throughout India for the duration of the trial, and thereby delayed the implementation of routine cervical screening among the general population of India for 18 years. During those 18 years, more than one million women died from cervical cancer in India, while Pap screening became "standard care" in other developing countries. Incorrect beliefs that Pap screening is not feasible in developing countries provide false justification for opportunity costs associated with the Mumbai trial and hinder cervical cancer prevention efforts in developing countries, where 90% of global cervical cancer deaths occur. Those incorrect beliefs also undermine World Health Organization policy guidelines, which should be corrected to acknowledge that good-quality Pap screening can be implemented in developing countries with reasonable investment. Tata Memorial Hospital and the US Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) determined the Mumbai trial was unethical. That determination has been effectively covered up by false and misleading statements from US medical leaders. All surviving Mumbai trial participants, from both intervention and control arms, should finally receive good-quality cervical screening tests. NCI leaders should accept OHRP determinations, acknowledge the Mumbai trial was unethical, and apologize to trial participants.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不道德的美国政府资助的子宫颈筛查研究在印度:美国信息自由法案披露。
通过《美国信息自由法》获得的文件显示,1997年,美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)在孟买资助了一项为期18年的随机对照试验,该试验使用死亡率终点来比较不可信的子宫颈筛查试验与未筛查试验。孟买试验要求印度和全球卫生领导人假定,在试验期间,"不进行筛查"仍将是整个印度的"标准护理",因此将在印度普通人口中实施常规子宫颈筛查的时间推迟了18年。在这18年中,印度有100多万妇女死于宫颈癌,而巴氏涂片检查在其他发展中国家成为“标准治疗”。认为巴氏涂片筛查在发展中国家不可行的错误看法,为孟买试验带来的机会成本提供了错误的理由,并阻碍了发展中国家预防宫颈癌的努力,而全球90%的宫颈癌死亡发生在发展中国家。这些不正确的观念也破坏了世界卫生组织的政策准则,这些准则应该得到纠正,承认发展中国家可以通过合理的投资实施高质量的子宫颈抹片检查。塔塔纪念医院和美国人类研究保护办公室(OHRP)认定孟买试验是不道德的。美国医学界领袖的虚假和误导性声明有效地掩盖了这一决定。所有幸存的孟买试验参与者,无论是干预组还是对照组,最终都应该接受高质量的子宫颈筛查测试。NCI领导人应接受OHRP的决定,承认孟买试验是不道德的,并向试验参与者道歉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信