Tracheostomy decision-making for children with medical complexity: What supports and resources do caregivers need?

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Savithri Nageswaran, William A Gower, Nancy M P King, Shannon L Golden
{"title":"Tracheostomy decision-making for children with medical complexity: What supports and resources do caregivers need?","authors":"Savithri Nageswaran, William A Gower, Nancy M P King, Shannon L Golden","doi":"10.1017/S1478951522001122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Caregivers of children with medical complexity (CMC) face decisions about life-sustaining interventions, such as tracheostomy. Our objective is to describe the support needs of caregivers of CMC and the resources they use surrounding tracheostomy decision-making (TDM) for their children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study, conducted between 2013 and 2015, consisted of semi-structured interviews with 56 caregivers of 41 CMC who had tracheostomies, and 5 focus groups of 33 clinicians at a tertiary care children's hospital. Participants were asked about their perspectives on the TDM process. Qualitative data were transcribed, coded, and organized into themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers used five domains of resources surrounding TDM: (1) social network including extended family members, friends, and clergy; (2) healthcare providers including physicians and nurses; (3) other parents of children with tracheostomy; (4) tangible materials such as print materials, videos, tracheostomy tubes, mannequins, and simulation labs; and (5) internet including websites, social media, and online health communities. Caregivers used these resources for (1) decision-making, (2) becoming knowledgeable and skillful about child's diagnosis, tracheostomy, and home care, and (3) emotional and spiritual well-being. Caregivers agreed that they received enough support, but there were gaps. Clinicians were knowledgeable about these resources, discussed social network and internet less often than the other domains, and identified gaps in supporting caregivers.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Caregivers' need for support and use of resources surrounding tracheostomy placement for CMC extended beyond decision-making, and included becoming knowledgeable and getting emotional/spiritual support. Healthcare providers exploring these resources with caregivers could improve the quality of TDM communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":" ","pages":"776-782"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951522001122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Caregivers of children with medical complexity (CMC) face decisions about life-sustaining interventions, such as tracheostomy. Our objective is to describe the support needs of caregivers of CMC and the resources they use surrounding tracheostomy decision-making (TDM) for their children.

Methods: This qualitative study, conducted between 2013 and 2015, consisted of semi-structured interviews with 56 caregivers of 41 CMC who had tracheostomies, and 5 focus groups of 33 clinicians at a tertiary care children's hospital. Participants were asked about their perspectives on the TDM process. Qualitative data were transcribed, coded, and organized into themes.

Results: Caregivers used five domains of resources surrounding TDM: (1) social network including extended family members, friends, and clergy; (2) healthcare providers including physicians and nurses; (3) other parents of children with tracheostomy; (4) tangible materials such as print materials, videos, tracheostomy tubes, mannequins, and simulation labs; and (5) internet including websites, social media, and online health communities. Caregivers used these resources for (1) decision-making, (2) becoming knowledgeable and skillful about child's diagnosis, tracheostomy, and home care, and (3) emotional and spiritual well-being. Caregivers agreed that they received enough support, but there were gaps. Clinicians were knowledgeable about these resources, discussed social network and internet less often than the other domains, and identified gaps in supporting caregivers.

Significance of results: Caregivers' need for support and use of resources surrounding tracheostomy placement for CMC extended beyond decision-making, and included becoming knowledgeable and getting emotional/spiritual support. Healthcare providers exploring these resources with caregivers could improve the quality of TDM communication.

为病情复杂的儿童做气管切开术决策:护理人员需要哪些支持和资源?
目的:医疗复杂性儿童(CMC)的照护者面临着气管切开术等维持生命干预措施的决策。我们的目标是描述 CMC 照护者的支持需求,以及他们在气管切开术决策(TDM)方面使用的资源:这项定性研究于 2013 年至 2015 年间进行,包括对 41 名气管切开的 CMC 的 56 名护理人员进行的半结构化访谈,以及由一家三甲儿童医院的 33 名临床医生组成的 5 个焦点小组。参与者被问及他们对 TDM 过程的看法。对定性数据进行了转录、编码和主题整理:护理人员围绕 TDM 使用了五个领域的资源:(1)社会网络,包括大家庭成员、朋友和神职人员;(2)医疗保健提供者,包括医生和护士;(3)其他气管切开术患儿的父母;(4)有形材料,如印刷材料、视频、气管切开管、人体模型和模拟实验室;以及(5)互联网,包括网站、社交媒体和在线健康社区。护理人员将这些资源用于:(1) 决策;(2) 掌握有关儿童诊断、气管切开术和家庭护理的知识和技能;(3) 情感和精神健康。护理人员一致认为他们得到了足够的支持,但也存在不足。临床医生对这些资源有所了解,但对社会网络和互联网的讨论少于其他领域,并指出了在支持照顾者方面存在的差距:结果的意义:护理人员在为 CMC 患者实施气管造口术时需要的支持和对相关资源的使用不仅仅局限于决策,还包括了解相关知识和获得情感/精神支持。医疗服务提供者与护理人员共同探索这些资源可提高气管造口术沟通的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信