Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2.

Oxford open immunology Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-09 DOI:10.1093/oxfimm/iqaa003
Daniel M Altmann
{"title":"Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2.","authors":"Daniel M Altmann","doi":"10.1093/oxfimm/iqaa003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The majority of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 exposed individuals mount an antibody response within around 2-weeks and spike antigen-binding responses correlate well with functional virus neutralization. A minority makes little detectable antibody, generally those with either very mild/asymptomatic disease or those with severe/lethal infection. However, in general, antibody titre correlates with viral load and duration of exposure. There is evidence for cross-reactivity with the other human coronaviruses, though the functional impact of this is as yet unclear. Therapeutic use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies offers potential for clinical use. While there is evidence for neutralizing antibody as a correlate of protection, some cases indicate the potential for full recovery in the absence of antibody. Studies of T-cell immunity following acute infection show CD4 and CD8 responses to epitopes across diverse viral antigens, possible cross-reactivity with epitopes from the common cold human coronaviruses and large-scale activation. However, in severe cases, there is evidence for T-cell lymphopaenia as well as expression of exhaustion markers. Analysis of serum biomarkers of disease severity implicates a hyperinflammatory contribution to pathogenesis, though this has not been mechanistically delineated beyond a likely role of raised IL-6, considered a therapeutic target. Despite rapid progress, there remain pressing unknowns. It seems likely that immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 may be relatively short lived, but this will need longitudinal investigation. Also, this is a disease of highly variable presentation and time course, with some progressing to protracted, chronic symptoms, which are not understood. The contribution of immunopathological mechanisms to tissue damage, whether in the lung, kidney, heart or blood vessels, is unclear. The immunology underlying the differential susceptibility between the very young and the very old is unresolved, a question with ramifications for vaccine roll-out. The greatest challenge relates to rapid generation, testing and manufacture of vaccines that are immunogenic, protective (at least from symptomatic disease) and safe-a challenge that looks achievable.</p>","PeriodicalId":74384,"journal":{"name":"Oxford open immunology","volume":"1 1","pages":"iqaa003"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford open immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfimm/iqaa003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The majority of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 exposed individuals mount an antibody response within around 2-weeks and spike antigen-binding responses correlate well with functional virus neutralization. A minority makes little detectable antibody, generally those with either very mild/asymptomatic disease or those with severe/lethal infection. However, in general, antibody titre correlates with viral load and duration of exposure. There is evidence for cross-reactivity with the other human coronaviruses, though the functional impact of this is as yet unclear. Therapeutic use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies offers potential for clinical use. While there is evidence for neutralizing antibody as a correlate of protection, some cases indicate the potential for full recovery in the absence of antibody. Studies of T-cell immunity following acute infection show CD4 and CD8 responses to epitopes across diverse viral antigens, possible cross-reactivity with epitopes from the common cold human coronaviruses and large-scale activation. However, in severe cases, there is evidence for T-cell lymphopaenia as well as expression of exhaustion markers. Analysis of serum biomarkers of disease severity implicates a hyperinflammatory contribution to pathogenesis, though this has not been mechanistically delineated beyond a likely role of raised IL-6, considered a therapeutic target. Despite rapid progress, there remain pressing unknowns. It seems likely that immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 may be relatively short lived, but this will need longitudinal investigation. Also, this is a disease of highly variable presentation and time course, with some progressing to protracted, chronic symptoms, which are not understood. The contribution of immunopathological mechanisms to tissue damage, whether in the lung, kidney, heart or blood vessels, is unclear. The immunology underlying the differential susceptibility between the very young and the very old is unresolved, a question with ramifications for vaccine roll-out. The greatest challenge relates to rapid generation, testing and manufacture of vaccines that are immunogenic, protective (at least from symptomatic disease) and safe-a challenge that looks achievable.

对 SARS-CoV-2 的适应性免疫。
大多数暴露于严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的人都会在 2 周左右的时间内产生抗体反应,尖峰抗原结合反应与功能性病毒中和密切相关。少数人几乎检测不到抗体,通常是病情非常轻微/无症状或感染严重/致命的人。不过,一般来说,抗体滴度与病毒载量和接触时间长短相关。有证据表明与其他人类冠状病毒存在交叉反应,但其功能影响尚不清楚。中和单克隆抗体的治疗为临床应用提供了可能性。虽然有证据表明中和抗体与保护作用相关,但一些病例表明,在没有抗体的情况下,患者也有可能完全康复。对急性感染后 T 细胞免疫的研究显示,CD4 和 CD8 对不同病毒抗原的表位有反应,可能与普通感冒人类冠状病毒的表位有交叉反应,并有大规模激活。然而,在严重病例中,有证据显示 T 细胞淋巴细胞减少以及衰竭标志物的表达。对疾病严重程度的血清生物标志物的分析表明,高炎症性是发病机制的一个因素,但除了被认为是治疗靶点的 IL-6 的可能作用外,尚未从机理上对这一因素进行界定。尽管研究进展迅速,但仍然存在紧迫的未知因素。对 SARS-CoV-2 的免疫记忆可能相对短暂,但这需要进行纵向研究。此外,这种疾病的表现和病程变化很大,有些人会发展为长期慢性症状,这一点尚不清楚。免疫病理机制对肺部、肾脏、心脏或血管等组织损伤的影响尚不清楚。年幼者和年长者易感性不同的免疫学基础尚未解决,这个问题对疫苗的推广有影响。最大的挑战是如何快速生成、测试和制造具有免疫原性、保护性(至少对无症状疾病)和安全性的疫苗--这一挑战看起来是可以实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信