Characterization of human induced pluripotent stems cells: Current approaches, challenges, and future solutions

Q1 Immunology and Microbiology
Sahana Suresh Babu, Haritha Duvvuru, Jillian Baker, Stephanie Switalski, Mehdi Shafa, Krishna Morgan Panchalingam, Saedeh Dadgar, Justin Beller, Behnam Ahmadian Baghbaderani
{"title":"Characterization of human induced pluripotent stems cells: Current approaches, challenges, and future solutions","authors":"Sahana Suresh Babu,&nbsp;Haritha Duvvuru,&nbsp;Jillian Baker,&nbsp;Stephanie Switalski,&nbsp;Mehdi Shafa,&nbsp;Krishna Morgan Panchalingam,&nbsp;Saedeh Dadgar,&nbsp;Justin Beller,&nbsp;Behnam Ahmadian Baghbaderani","doi":"10.1016/j.btre.2023.e00784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) have demonstrated massive potentials for use in regenerative and personalized medicine due to their ability to expand in culture and differentiate into specialized cells with therapeutic benefits. However, in order to industrialize iPSC-derived therapies, it is necessary to address the existing challenges surrounding the analytics implemented in the manufacturing process to evaluate and monitor cell expansion, differentiation, and quality of the final products. Here, we review some of the key analytical methods used as part of identity, potency, or safety for in-process or final product release testing and highlighted the challenges and potential solutions for consideration in the Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) strategy for iPSC-based therapies.</p><p>Some of the challenges associated with characterization and testing of iPSC-based products are related to the choice of analytical technology (to ensure fit-for-purpose), assay reliability and robustness. Automation of analytical methods may be required to reduce hands on time, and improve reliability of the methods through reducing assay variability. Indeed, we have shown that automation of analytical methods is feasible (evaluated using an ELISA based assay) and would result in more precise measurements (demonstrated by lower co-efficient of Variation and standard deviation), less hands-on time, and swift compared to a manually run assay. Therefore, in order to support commercialization of iPSC-based therapies we suggest a well-designed testing strategy to be established in the development phase while incorporating robust, reproducible, reliable, and potentially automated analytics in the manufacturing process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38117,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/aa/c0/main.PMC9929203.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215017X23000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) have demonstrated massive potentials for use in regenerative and personalized medicine due to their ability to expand in culture and differentiate into specialized cells with therapeutic benefits. However, in order to industrialize iPSC-derived therapies, it is necessary to address the existing challenges surrounding the analytics implemented in the manufacturing process to evaluate and monitor cell expansion, differentiation, and quality of the final products. Here, we review some of the key analytical methods used as part of identity, potency, or safety for in-process or final product release testing and highlighted the challenges and potential solutions for consideration in the Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) strategy for iPSC-based therapies.

Some of the challenges associated with characterization and testing of iPSC-based products are related to the choice of analytical technology (to ensure fit-for-purpose), assay reliability and robustness. Automation of analytical methods may be required to reduce hands on time, and improve reliability of the methods through reducing assay variability. Indeed, we have shown that automation of analytical methods is feasible (evaluated using an ELISA based assay) and would result in more precise measurements (demonstrated by lower co-efficient of Variation and standard deviation), less hands-on time, and swift compared to a manually run assay. Therefore, in order to support commercialization of iPSC-based therapies we suggest a well-designed testing strategy to be established in the development phase while incorporating robust, reproducible, reliable, and potentially automated analytics in the manufacturing process.

Abstract Image

人类诱导多能干细胞的特性:当前的方法、挑战和未来的解决方案
人类诱导多能干细胞(iPSC)由于能够在培养中扩增并分化为具有治疗益处的特异性细胞,已在再生和个性化医学中显示出巨大的应用潜力。然而,为了使iPSC衍生疗法工业化,有必要解决制造过程中实施的分析所面临的现有挑战,以评估和监测细胞扩增、分化和最终产品的质量。在这里,我们回顾了一些关键的分析方法,这些方法被用作过程中或最终产品释放测试的身份、效力或安全性的一部分,并强调了基于iPSC的治疗的化学、制造和控制(CMC)策略中需要考虑的挑战和潜在解决方案。与基于iPSC的产品的表征和测试相关的一些挑战与分析技术的选择(以确保符合目的)、分析可靠性和稳健性有关。分析方法的自动化可能需要减少动手时间,并通过减少测定变异性来提高方法的可靠性。事实上,我们已经证明,分析方法的自动化是可行的(使用基于ELISA的分析进行评估),并且与手动运行的分析相比,将导致更精确的测量(通过更低的变异系数和标准偏差来证明)、更少的动手时间和快速。因此,为了支持基于iPSC的疗法的商业化,我们建议在开发阶段制定一个精心设计的测试策略,同时在制造过程中纳入稳健、可重复、可靠和潜在的自动化分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biotechnology Reports
Biotechnology Reports Immunology and Microbiology-Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Biotechnology Reports covers all aspects of Biotechnology particularly those reports that are useful and informative and that will be of value to other researchers in related fields. Biotechnology Reports loves ground breaking science, but will also accept good science that can be of use to the biotechnology community. The journal maintains a high quality peer review where submissions are considered on the basis of scientific validity and technical quality. Acceptable paper types are research articles (short or full communications), methods, mini-reviews, and commentaries in the following areas: Healthcare and pharmaceutical biotechnology Agricultural and food biotechnology Environmental biotechnology Molecular biology, cell and tissue engineering and synthetic biology Industrial biotechnology, biofuels and bioenergy Nanobiotechnology Bioinformatics & systems biology New processes and products in biotechnology, bioprocess engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信