Breaking the Binary: How Clinicians Can Ensure Everyone Receives High Quality Reproductive Health Services.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Christina Jung, Adam Hunter, Mona Saleh, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Siripanth Nippita
{"title":"Breaking the Binary: How Clinicians Can Ensure Everyone Receives High Quality Reproductive Health Services.","authors":"Christina Jung,&nbsp;Adam Hunter,&nbsp;Mona Saleh,&nbsp;Gwendolyn P Quinn,&nbsp;Siripanth Nippita","doi":"10.2147/OAJC.S368621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The gender binary has historically defined the study and practice of reproductive and sexual healthcare. However, the male and female binary categorization of sex does not adequately define patients seeking reproductive and sexual health. Comprehensive sexual healthcare should consider diverse gender identity and non-heteronormative sexual practices, family planning, sexually transmitted infections, cancer prevention, and sexual function. Recent research suggests clinicians do not feel prepared to provide care for sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients. In this narrative review, we focus on reproductive and sexual health within the scope of obstetric and gynecologic (OB/GYN) clinical practice. We used traditional medical subject headings to summarize data from publications in peer-reviewed journals published in the last 10 years and identified barriers, facilitators and best practices for de-gendering reproductive healthcare. Following a roughly chronological care path across the lifespan, we categorized findings into the following topics: Early Care for SGM, Sexual Health, Family Planning, and Care Later in Life for SGM. We include recommendations for creating a welcoming environment, SGM inclusive training for clinicians and staff, and best practices for individualized counseling. We review suggested practices related to service delivery and clinical considerations in the provision of sexual and reproductive health care for gender and sexual minority patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":74348,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bb/e7/oajc-14-23.PMC9939798.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S368621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The gender binary has historically defined the study and practice of reproductive and sexual healthcare. However, the male and female binary categorization of sex does not adequately define patients seeking reproductive and sexual health. Comprehensive sexual healthcare should consider diverse gender identity and non-heteronormative sexual practices, family planning, sexually transmitted infections, cancer prevention, and sexual function. Recent research suggests clinicians do not feel prepared to provide care for sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients. In this narrative review, we focus on reproductive and sexual health within the scope of obstetric and gynecologic (OB/GYN) clinical practice. We used traditional medical subject headings to summarize data from publications in peer-reviewed journals published in the last 10 years and identified barriers, facilitators and best practices for de-gendering reproductive healthcare. Following a roughly chronological care path across the lifespan, we categorized findings into the following topics: Early Care for SGM, Sexual Health, Family Planning, and Care Later in Life for SGM. We include recommendations for creating a welcoming environment, SGM inclusive training for clinicians and staff, and best practices for individualized counseling. We review suggested practices related to service delivery and clinical considerations in the provision of sexual and reproductive health care for gender and sexual minority patients.

打破二元:临床医生如何确保每个人都能获得高质量的生殖健康服务。
历史上,二元性别定义了生殖保健和性保健的研究和实践。然而,性别的男性和女性二元分类不能充分定义寻求生殖和性健康的患者。全面的性保健应考虑多样化的性别认同和非异性恋性行为、计划生育、性传播感染、癌症预防和性功能。最近的研究表明,临床医生没有准备好为性和性别少数(SGM)患者提供护理。在这叙述性审查,我们侧重于生殖健康和性健康范围内的产科和妇科(OB/GYN)临床实践。我们使用传统的医学主题标题来总结过去10年发表在同行评议期刊上的出版物数据,并确定了生殖保健去性别化的障碍、促进因素和最佳做法。按照大致按时间顺序排列的生命周期护理路径,我们将研究结果分为以下主题:SGM的早期护理、性健康、计划生育和SGM的晚年护理。我们包括创建温馨环境的建议,为临床医生和员工提供的SGM包容性培训,以及个性化咨询的最佳实践。我们回顾了在为性别和性少数患者提供性健康和生殖健康保健方面与服务提供和临床考虑相关的建议做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信