Fabian Moll, Axel Kessel, Anna Bonetto, Johanna Stresow, Monika Herten, Marcel Dudda, Jens Adermann
{"title":"Safety and Feasibility of Robot-assisted Gait Training in Adults with Cerebral Palsy in an Inpatient Setting - an Observational Study.","authors":"Fabian Moll, Axel Kessel, Anna Bonetto, Johanna Stresow, Monika Herten, Marcel Dudda, Jens Adermann","doi":"10.1007/s10882-023-09895-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the safety and feasibility of six sessions of Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) integrated into an inpatient therapy concept and their influence on walking speed and gait parameters in adult CP patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven subjects (male = 8, female = 3, mean age: 23 years and 2 months, ± 4.5 years) with spastic CP underwent six 20-minute RAGT sessions with the HAL during an 11-day hospital stay. Additionally, physiotherapy, physician-performed manual medicine, massage and exercise therapy were provided. Pre- (T1) and post- (T2) intervention assessments were: 10-metre walking test (10MWT), 6-minute walking test (6MWT), Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) and lower extremities passive range of motion (pROM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All subjects completed the study. No adverse events were noted. Walking speed in the 10MWT test increased from 32.5 s (± 24.5 s) at T1 to 27.5 s (± 21.4 s) at T2, without significance. Slight, but non-significant improvements were detected in the 6MWT, GMFM and pROM. Confounding factors did not significantly affect the results. Conclusion: Intensive therapy including HAL training leads to non-significant improvements. Further studies with more patients and longer intervention time could provide further insights into the RAGT therapy of adult patients with CP. Registration DRKS-ID: DRKS00020275.</p>","PeriodicalId":47565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9918396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-023-09895-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To investigate the safety and feasibility of six sessions of Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) integrated into an inpatient therapy concept and their influence on walking speed and gait parameters in adult CP patients.
Methods: Eleven subjects (male = 8, female = 3, mean age: 23 years and 2 months, ± 4.5 years) with spastic CP underwent six 20-minute RAGT sessions with the HAL during an 11-day hospital stay. Additionally, physiotherapy, physician-performed manual medicine, massage and exercise therapy were provided. Pre- (T1) and post- (T2) intervention assessments were: 10-metre walking test (10MWT), 6-minute walking test (6MWT), Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) and lower extremities passive range of motion (pROM).
Results: All subjects completed the study. No adverse events were noted. Walking speed in the 10MWT test increased from 32.5 s (± 24.5 s) at T1 to 27.5 s (± 21.4 s) at T2, without significance. Slight, but non-significant improvements were detected in the 6MWT, GMFM and pROM. Confounding factors did not significantly affect the results. Conclusion: Intensive therapy including HAL training leads to non-significant improvements. Further studies with more patients and longer intervention time could provide further insights into the RAGT therapy of adult patients with CP. Registration DRKS-ID: DRKS00020275.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of original research and clinical reports from a variety of fields serving persons with developmental and physical disabilities. Submissions from researchers, clinicians, and related professionals in the fields of psychology, rehabilitation, special education, kinesiology, counseling, social work, psychiatry, nursing, and rehabilitation medicine are considered. Investigations utilizing group comparisons as well as single-case experimental designs are of primary interest. In addition, case studies that are of particular clinical relevance or that describe innovative evaluation and intervention techniques are welcome. All research and clinical reports should contain sufficient procedural detail so that readers can clearly understand what was done, how it was done, and why the strategy was selected. Rigorously conducted replication studies utilizing group and single-case designs are welcome irrespective of results obtained. In addition, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and theoretical discussions that contribute substantially to understanding the problems and strengths of persons with developmental and physical disabilities are considered for publication. Authors are encouraged to preregister empirical studies, replications, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses in a relevant public database and to include such information with their submission to the journal. Authors are also encouraged, where possible and applicable, to deposit data that support the findings of their research in a public repository (see detailed “Research Data Policy” module in the journal’s Instructions for Authors). In response to the need for increased clinical and research endeavors with persons with developmental and physical disabilities, the journal is cross-categorical and unbiased methodologically.