Natural language processing in toxicology: Delineating adverse outcome pathways and guiding the application of new approach methodologies

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Marie P.F. Corradi , Alyanne M. de Haan , Bernard Staumont , Aldert H. Piersma , Liesbet Geris , Raymond H.H. Pieters , Cyrille A.M. Krul , Marc A.T. Teunis
{"title":"Natural language processing in toxicology: Delineating adverse outcome pathways and guiding the application of new approach methodologies","authors":"Marie P.F. Corradi ,&nbsp;Alyanne M. de Haan ,&nbsp;Bernard Staumont ,&nbsp;Aldert H. Piersma ,&nbsp;Liesbet Geris ,&nbsp;Raymond H.H. Pieters ,&nbsp;Cyrille A.M. Krul ,&nbsp;Marc A.T. Teunis","doi":"10.1016/j.bbiosy.2022.100061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) are conceptual frameworks that tie an initial perturbation (molecular initiating event) to a phenotypic toxicological manifestation (adverse outcome), through a series of steps (key events). They provide therefore a standardized way to map and organize toxicological mechanistic information. As such, AOPs inform on key events underlying toxicity, thus supporting the development of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), which aim to reduce the use of animal testing for toxicology purposes.</p><p>However, the establishment of a novel AOP relies on the gathering of multiple streams of evidence and information, from available literature to knowledge databases. Often, this information is in the form of free text, also called unstructured text, which is not immediately digestible by a computer. This information is thus both tedious and increasingly time-consuming to process manually with the growing volume of data available. The advancement of machine learning provides alternative solutions to this challenge. To extract and organize information from relevant sources, it seems valuable to employ deep learning Natural Language Processing techniques.</p><p>We review here some of the recent progress in the NLP field, and show how these techniques have already demonstrated value in the biomedical and toxicology areas. We also propose an approach to efficiently and reliably extract and combine relevant toxicological information from text. This data can be used to map underlying mechanisms that lead to toxicological effects and start building quantitative models, in particular AOPs, ultimately allowing animal-free human-based hazard and risk assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72379,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterials and biosystems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934466/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterials and biosystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266653442200023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) are conceptual frameworks that tie an initial perturbation (molecular initiating event) to a phenotypic toxicological manifestation (adverse outcome), through a series of steps (key events). They provide therefore a standardized way to map and organize toxicological mechanistic information. As such, AOPs inform on key events underlying toxicity, thus supporting the development of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), which aim to reduce the use of animal testing for toxicology purposes.

However, the establishment of a novel AOP relies on the gathering of multiple streams of evidence and information, from available literature to knowledge databases. Often, this information is in the form of free text, also called unstructured text, which is not immediately digestible by a computer. This information is thus both tedious and increasingly time-consuming to process manually with the growing volume of data available. The advancement of machine learning provides alternative solutions to this challenge. To extract and organize information from relevant sources, it seems valuable to employ deep learning Natural Language Processing techniques.

We review here some of the recent progress in the NLP field, and show how these techniques have already demonstrated value in the biomedical and toxicology areas. We also propose an approach to efficiently and reliably extract and combine relevant toxicological information from text. This data can be used to map underlying mechanisms that lead to toxicological effects and start building quantitative models, in particular AOPs, ultimately allowing animal-free human-based hazard and risk assessment.

毒理学中的自然语言处理:描述不良结果途径和指导新方法方法的应用
不良后果途径(AOPs)是一个概念性框架,通过一系列步骤(关键事件)将初始扰动(分子启动事件)与表型毒理学表现(不良后果)联系起来。因此,它们提供了一种标准化的方法来绘制和组织毒理学机制信息。因此,AOPs提供了潜在毒性的关键事件信息,从而支持新方法方法(NAMs)的发展,其目的是减少用于毒理学目的的动物试验。然而,建立一个新的AOP依赖于收集多个证据和信息流,从可用的文献到知识数据库。通常,这些信息是自由文本的形式,也称为非结构化文本,不能立即被计算机消化。因此,随着可用数据量的增加,手动处理这些信息既繁琐又越来越耗时。机器学习的进步为这一挑战提供了替代解决方案。为了从相关来源提取和组织信息,采用深度学习自然语言处理技术似乎很有价值。我们在这里回顾了NLP领域的一些最新进展,并展示了这些技术如何在生物医学和毒理学领域展示了价值。我们还提出了一种高效、可靠地从文本中提取和组合相关毒理学信息的方法。这些数据可用于绘制导致毒理学效应的潜在机制,并开始建立定量模型,特别是aop,最终实现无动物的基于人类的危害和风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信