Investigation of the knowledge of South African high school rugby coaches on concussion and the return-to-play protocol.

Q3 Health Professions
N C Abel, C C Grant, D C Janse van Rensburg
{"title":"Investigation of the knowledge of South African high school rugby coaches on concussion and the return-to-play protocol.","authors":"N C Abel,&nbsp;C C Grant,&nbsp;D C Janse van Rensburg","doi":"10.17159/2078-516X/2022/v34i1a12255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coaches are pivotal in the management of concussed players. Assessing the knowledge of high school rugby coaches with regard to concussion management will enable relevant future education on this topic to be covered.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the knowledge of South African high school rugby coaches on concussion symptom recognition, knowledge and stepwise return-to-play (RTP) protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive study involving 143 first team, high school rugby coaches was completed via an electronic questionnaire. Independent variables included coach demographics, qualifications, experience, BokSmart accreditation, and school size. Dependent variables included knowledge scores on concussion symptoms, general concussion knowledge, stepwise RTP and Maddocks questions. Relationships between total scores for different demographic groupings were established using non-parametric techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The coaches had high general, symptom and overall concussion knowledge scores (77% - 80%) in contrast with low RTP scores (62%) and very low Maddocks questions knowledge scores (26%). The 35-44-year age group received top scores for symptom recognition (p=0.034) and total concussion knowledge (p=0.041). Larger category school coaches (p=0.008) and BokSmart accredited coaches (p=0.041) outperformed all other coaches in general concussion knowledge and total knowledge, respectively. However, respondents were not familiar with emotional symptoms or the importance of cognitive rest after a concussion. Educational programmes were the most popular knowledge source for coaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In general, coaches presented with good general concussion knowledge but lesser expertise on emotional symptoms, cognitive rest and RTP management. Modifiable predictors of knowledge included the expansion of BokSmart accreditation, focussing information sessions on smaller rugby size schools and the education of coaches younger than 35 years or older than 45 years of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":31065,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":"v34i1a12255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2022/v34i1a12255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coaches are pivotal in the management of concussed players. Assessing the knowledge of high school rugby coaches with regard to concussion management will enable relevant future education on this topic to be covered.

Objectives: To investigate the knowledge of South African high school rugby coaches on concussion symptom recognition, knowledge and stepwise return-to-play (RTP) protocols.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study involving 143 first team, high school rugby coaches was completed via an electronic questionnaire. Independent variables included coach demographics, qualifications, experience, BokSmart accreditation, and school size. Dependent variables included knowledge scores on concussion symptoms, general concussion knowledge, stepwise RTP and Maddocks questions. Relationships between total scores for different demographic groupings were established using non-parametric techniques.

Results: The coaches had high general, symptom and overall concussion knowledge scores (77% - 80%) in contrast with low RTP scores (62%) and very low Maddocks questions knowledge scores (26%). The 35-44-year age group received top scores for symptom recognition (p=0.034) and total concussion knowledge (p=0.041). Larger category school coaches (p=0.008) and BokSmart accredited coaches (p=0.041) outperformed all other coaches in general concussion knowledge and total knowledge, respectively. However, respondents were not familiar with emotional symptoms or the importance of cognitive rest after a concussion. Educational programmes were the most popular knowledge source for coaches.

Conclusion: In general, coaches presented with good general concussion knowledge but lesser expertise on emotional symptoms, cognitive rest and RTP management. Modifiable predictors of knowledge included the expansion of BokSmart accreditation, focussing information sessions on smaller rugby size schools and the education of coaches younger than 35 years or older than 45 years of age.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

南非高中橄榄球教练对脑震荡和恢复比赛规程知识的调查。
背景:教练是管理脑震荡运动员的关键。评估高中橄榄球教练在脑震荡管理方面的知识,将使有关这一主题的未来教育得以覆盖。目的:了解南非高中橄榄球教练对脑震荡症状的认知、认知和逐步恢复比赛(RTP)方案。方法:采用电子问卷对143名一线队高中橄榄球教练进行横断面描述性研究。独立变量包括教练人口统计、资格、经验、BokSmart认证和学校规模。因变量包括脑震荡症状、一般脑震荡知识、逐步RTP和Maddocks问题的知识得分。使用非参数技术建立不同人口统计学分组总分之间的关系。结果:教练员一般、症状和总体脑震荡知识得分高(77% ~ 80%),RTP得分低(62%),Maddocks问题知识得分极低(26%)。35-44岁年龄组在症状识别(p=0.034)和总脑震荡知识(p=0.041)方面得分最高。较大类别学校教练(p=0.008)和BokSmart认证教练(p=0.041)在一般脑震荡知识和总知识方面分别优于所有其他教练。然而,受访者不熟悉脑震荡后的情绪症状或认知休息的重要性。教育节目是教练最受欢迎的知识来源。结论:教练员对脑震荡的一般知识较好,但在情绪症状、认知休息和RTP管理方面的专业知识较差。可修改的知识预测指标包括扩大BokSmart认证,将信息会议的重点放在规模较小的橄榄球学校,以及对年龄小于35岁或大于45岁的教练的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信