“You have to trust yourself”: The Overlooked Role of Self-Trust in Coping with Chronic Illness

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Rachel Grob, Stacy Van Gorp, Jane Alice Evered
{"title":"“You have to trust yourself”: The Overlooked Role of Self-Trust in Coping with Chronic Illness","authors":"Rachel Grob,&nbsp;Stacy Van Gorp,&nbsp;Jane Alice Evered","doi":"10.1002/hast.1522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Self-trust is essential to the well-being of people with chronic illnesses and those who care for them. In this exploratory essay, we draw on a trove of health narratives to catalyze examination of this important but often overlooked topic. We explore how self-trust is impeded at both personal and structural levels, how it can best be nourished, and how it is related to self-advocacy. Because people's ability to trust themselves is intrinsically linked to the trust others have in them, we pay particular attention to the role that allies such as clinical professionals play in the development of self-trust, highlighting the importance of eliciting patient narratives, of curious listening, and of compassionately raising questions. We also contrast the self-trust paradigm with that of self-management, which tends to replace the former's attention to patients’ experiences, abilities, qualities, or judgments with a professionally dominated discourse dedicated to addressing illness through behavior changes prescribed by clinicians. We close with a call to action, exhorting readers to focus on supporting self-trust in health care settings and on creative research in this critical yet heretofore underrepresented domain</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.1522","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-trust is essential to the well-being of people with chronic illnesses and those who care for them. In this exploratory essay, we draw on a trove of health narratives to catalyze examination of this important but often overlooked topic. We explore how self-trust is impeded at both personal and structural levels, how it can best be nourished, and how it is related to self-advocacy. Because people's ability to trust themselves is intrinsically linked to the trust others have in them, we pay particular attention to the role that allies such as clinical professionals play in the development of self-trust, highlighting the importance of eliciting patient narratives, of curious listening, and of compassionately raising questions. We also contrast the self-trust paradigm with that of self-management, which tends to replace the former's attention to patients’ experiences, abilities, qualities, or judgments with a professionally dominated discourse dedicated to addressing illness through behavior changes prescribed by clinicians. We close with a call to action, exhorting readers to focus on supporting self-trust in health care settings and on creative research in this critical yet heretofore underrepresented domain.

“你必须相信自己”:自信在应对慢性疾病中被忽视的作用
自信对慢性病患者和照顾他们的人的福祉至关重要。在这篇探索性的文章中,我们借鉴了大量的健康叙事来促进对这一重要但经常被忽视的话题的研究。我们将探讨自信在个人和结构层面上是如何受到阻碍的,如何才能最好地培养自信,以及自信与自我宣传之间的关系。因为人们信任自己的能力与他人对他们的信任有着内在的联系,所以我们特别关注临床专业人员等盟友在培养自信方面所起的作用,强调引出病人叙述、好奇倾听和富有同情心地提出问题的重要性。我们还将自我信任范式与自我管理范式进行了对比,后者倾向于用专业主导的话语来取代前者对患者经历、能力、品质或判断的关注,这些话语致力于通过临床医生规定的行为改变来解决疾病。最后,我们呼吁采取行动,劝告读者把重点放在支持卫生保健环境中的自信和在这个关键但迄今代表性不足的领域的创造性研究上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信