Timothy McAleese, Tiarnán Ó Doinn, James M Broderick, Ross Farrington, Anna-Rose Prior, John F Quinlan
{"title":"Surgical helmet systems in total joint arthroplasty: assessment of hood sterility and donning technique.","authors":"Timothy McAleese, Tiarnán Ó Doinn, James M Broderick, Ross Farrington, Anna-Rose Prior, John F Quinlan","doi":"10.1186/s42836-023-00212-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is increasing, coincident with the rising volume of joint arthroplasty being performed. With recent controversy regarding the efficacy of surgical helmet systems (SHS) in preventing infection, the focus has turned to the correct donning techniques and usage of surgical hoods. The aim of this study was to compare the bacterial contamination of the operating surgeon's gloves after two common donning techniques of SHS hoods. We also evaluated the baseline sterility of the SHS hoods at the beginning of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The bacterial contamination rate was quantified using colony-forming units (CFUs), with 50 trials performed per donning technique. Samples were cultured on 5% Columbia blood agar in ambient air at 37 °C for 48 h and all subsequent bacterial growth was identified using a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer. In Group 1, the operating surgeon donned their colleague's hood. In Group 2, the operating surgeon had their hood applied by a non-scrubbed colleague. After each trial, the operating surgeon immediately inoculated their gloves onto an agar plate. The immediate sterility of 50 SHS hoods was assessed at two separate zones-the screen (Zone 1) and the neckline (Zone 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in contamination rates between the two techniques (3% vs. 2%, P = 0.99) or between right and left glove contamination rates. Immediately after donning, 6/50 (12%) of SHS hoods cultured an organism. Contamination rates at both the face shield and neckline zones were equivalent. The majority of bacteria cultured were Bacillus species.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found no significant difference in the operating surgeon's glove contamination using two common SHS hood-donning techniques when they were performed under laminar airflow with late fan activation. We suggest the SHS hood should not be assumed to be completely sterile and that gloves are changed if it is touched intraoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":52831,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty","volume":"5 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10647130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00212-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is increasing, coincident with the rising volume of joint arthroplasty being performed. With recent controversy regarding the efficacy of surgical helmet systems (SHS) in preventing infection, the focus has turned to the correct donning techniques and usage of surgical hoods. The aim of this study was to compare the bacterial contamination of the operating surgeon's gloves after two common donning techniques of SHS hoods. We also evaluated the baseline sterility of the SHS hoods at the beginning of the procedure.
Methods: The bacterial contamination rate was quantified using colony-forming units (CFUs), with 50 trials performed per donning technique. Samples were cultured on 5% Columbia blood agar in ambient air at 37 °C for 48 h and all subsequent bacterial growth was identified using a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer. In Group 1, the operating surgeon donned their colleague's hood. In Group 2, the operating surgeon had their hood applied by a non-scrubbed colleague. After each trial, the operating surgeon immediately inoculated their gloves onto an agar plate. The immediate sterility of 50 SHS hoods was assessed at two separate zones-the screen (Zone 1) and the neckline (Zone 2).
Results: There was no significant difference in contamination rates between the two techniques (3% vs. 2%, P = 0.99) or between right and left glove contamination rates. Immediately after donning, 6/50 (12%) of SHS hoods cultured an organism. Contamination rates at both the face shield and neckline zones were equivalent. The majority of bacteria cultured were Bacillus species.
Discussion: We found no significant difference in the operating surgeon's glove contamination using two common SHS hood-donning techniques when they were performed under laminar airflow with late fan activation. We suggest the SHS hood should not be assumed to be completely sterile and that gloves are changed if it is touched intraoperatively.
背景:人工关节感染(PJI)的发生率随着人工关节置换术量的增加而增加。随着最近关于手术头盔系统(SHS)在预防感染方面的有效性的争议,焦点已转向正确的戴帽技术和手术帽的使用。本研究的目的是比较两种常见的SHS面罩佩戴技术后手术外科医生手套的细菌污染情况。我们还在程序开始时评估了SHS罩的基线无菌性。方法:采用菌落形成单位(colony forming units, cfu)定量测定细菌污染率,每种技术进行50次试验。样品在5%哥伦比亚血琼脂上于37℃环境空气中培养48 h,随后所有细菌生长使用MALDI-TOF质谱仪进行鉴定。在第一组,手术外科医生戴上他们同事的头罩。在第二组,手术外科医生的头罩由一名未擦洗的同事涂抹。每次试验后,外科医生立即将手套接种到琼脂板上。在两个单独的区域-屏幕(区域1)和领口(区域2)评估50个SHS面罩的即时无菌性。结果:两种技术之间的污染率(3% vs. 2%, P = 0.99)或左右手套污染率之间没有显着差异。穿上后,6/50(12%)的SHS帽立即培养出生物体。面罩和领口区域的污染率相等。培养的细菌以芽孢杆菌为主。讨论:我们发现在层流气流和后期风扇激活下,使用两种常见的SHS连帽技术进行手术时,外科医生的手套污染没有显著差异。我们建议SHS罩不应该被认为是完全无菌的,如果术中接触到它,就要更换手套。