Using Latent Profile Analysis to Understand Health Practitioners' Attitudes Toward Voluntary Assisted Dying.

IF 1.3
Omega Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-24 DOI:10.1177/00302228221149453
Morgana Lizzio-Wilson, Emma F Thomas, Winnifred R Louis, Monique F Crane, Madison Kho, Pascal Molenberghs, Susilo Wibisono, Kiara Minto, Catherine E Amiot, Jean Decety, Lauren J Breen, Kerrie Noonan, Liz Forbat, Felicity Allen
{"title":"Using Latent Profile Analysis to Understand Health Practitioners' Attitudes Toward Voluntary Assisted Dying.","authors":"Morgana Lizzio-Wilson, Emma F Thomas, Winnifred R Louis, Monique F Crane, Madison Kho, Pascal Molenberghs, Susilo Wibisono, Kiara Minto, Catherine E Amiot, Jean Decety, Lauren J Breen, Kerrie Noonan, Liz Forbat, Felicity Allen","doi":"10.1177/00302228221149453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior work has documented considerable diversity among health practitioners regarding their support for voluntary assisted dying (VAD). We examined whether their attitudes are characterised by different combinations of personal support, normative support by other health practitioners, and whether they are predisposed to vicariously experience others' emotions (i.e., empathy). We also examined whether these profiles experienced different mental health outcomes (i.e., burnout and posttraumatic stress) in relation to VAD. To test this, 104 Australian health practitioners were surveyed after VAD was legalised in Victoria, Australia in 2019. Results indicated that practitioners' attitudes were characterised by three profiles: 1) strong personal and normative support (strong VAD supporters), 2) moderate personal and normative support (moderate VAD supporters), and 3) lower personal and normative support (apprehensive practitioners). However, each profile reported similar mental health outcomes. Findings suggest that the normative environments in which health practitioners operate may explain their diverse attitudes on VAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"1111-1139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228221149453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior work has documented considerable diversity among health practitioners regarding their support for voluntary assisted dying (VAD). We examined whether their attitudes are characterised by different combinations of personal support, normative support by other health practitioners, and whether they are predisposed to vicariously experience others' emotions (i.e., empathy). We also examined whether these profiles experienced different mental health outcomes (i.e., burnout and posttraumatic stress) in relation to VAD. To test this, 104 Australian health practitioners were surveyed after VAD was legalised in Victoria, Australia in 2019. Results indicated that practitioners' attitudes were characterised by three profiles: 1) strong personal and normative support (strong VAD supporters), 2) moderate personal and normative support (moderate VAD supporters), and 3) lower personal and normative support (apprehensive practitioners). However, each profile reported similar mental health outcomes. Findings suggest that the normative environments in which health practitioners operate may explain their diverse attitudes on VAD.

利用潜在特征分析了解医疗从业人员对自愿协助死亡的态度。
先前的研究记录了医疗从业人员对自愿协助死亡(VAD)的支持存在相当大的差异。我们研究了他们的态度是否因个人支持、其他医疗从业人员的规范性支持以及他们是否倾向于体验他人的情绪(即移情)而有所不同。我们还研究了这些特征是否会导致与 VAD 相关的不同心理健康结果(即职业倦怠和创伤后应激反应)。为了验证这一点,我们在 2019 年澳大利亚维多利亚州将自愿终止妊娠合法化后,对 104 名澳大利亚医疗从业人员进行了调查。结果表明,从业人员的态度有三种特征:1)强烈的个人和规范支持(强烈的自愿药物滥用支持者);2)适度的个人和规范支持(适度的自愿药物滥用支持者);3)较低的个人和规范支持(忐忑不安的从业者)。然而,每种情况都报告了相似的心理健康结果。研究结果表明,医疗从业人员所处的规范环境可能是他们对自愿离职评估持不同态度的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信