Effects of a simplified drilling protocol at 50 rpm on heat generation under water-free conditions: an in vitro study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hyeon-Ji Jang, Jin-Un Yoon, Ji-Young Joo, Ju-Youn Lee, Hyun-Joo Kim
{"title":"Effects of a simplified drilling protocol at 50 rpm on heat generation under water-free conditions: an <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Hyeon-Ji Jang,&nbsp;Jin-Un Yoon,&nbsp;Ji-Young Joo,&nbsp;Ju-Youn Lee,&nbsp;Hyun-Joo Kim","doi":"10.5051/jpis.2201400070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In recent years, guided implant surgery has been widely used for the convenience of patients and surgeons. Further streamlining the surgical procedure would make implant surgery more convenient. Low-speed water-free conditions are often used in guided implant surgery. Therefore, in this study, we attempted to confirm once again whether drilling was safe at a low speed without water. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a simplified drilling protocol that omits some intermediate steps in the drilling process was safe from the viewpoint of heat generation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>D1 density artificial bone blocks were drilled under 50 rpm, 10 N·cm water-free conditions, and the surface temperature was measured using a digital infrared camera. First, drilling was performed with the sequential drilling method, which is the most widely used technique. Second, for each drill diameter, the temperature change was measured while performing simplified drilling with omission of the previous 1, 2, or 3 steps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In sequential drilling, the heat generated during drilling at all diameters was less than the critical temperature of osteonecrosis (47°C) except for the ⌀2 drill. Statistical significance was observed in all groups when comparing sequential and simplified drilling in the ⌀3.2, ⌀3.8, and ⌀4.3 drills (<i>P</i><0.001). However, in the simplified drilling procedures, the temperature was below the osteonecrosis threshold temperature (47°C) except for the ⌀4.3 drill with the omission of the previous 3 steps (⌀3.0, ⌀3.2, and ⌀3.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In general, drilling under low-speed, water-free conditions has shown stable results in terms of heat generation. Simplified drilling showed statistically significantly greater heat generation than sequential drilling. However, most of the diameters and omitted steps seem to be clinically acceptable, so it will be useful if an appropriate selection is made according to the patient's clinical condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":48795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","volume":"53 1","pages":"85-95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/05/d7/jpis-53-85.PMC9943703.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2201400070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In recent years, guided implant surgery has been widely used for the convenience of patients and surgeons. Further streamlining the surgical procedure would make implant surgery more convenient. Low-speed water-free conditions are often used in guided implant surgery. Therefore, in this study, we attempted to confirm once again whether drilling was safe at a low speed without water. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a simplified drilling protocol that omits some intermediate steps in the drilling process was safe from the viewpoint of heat generation.

Methods: D1 density artificial bone blocks were drilled under 50 rpm, 10 N·cm water-free conditions, and the surface temperature was measured using a digital infrared camera. First, drilling was performed with the sequential drilling method, which is the most widely used technique. Second, for each drill diameter, the temperature change was measured while performing simplified drilling with omission of the previous 1, 2, or 3 steps.

Results: In sequential drilling, the heat generated during drilling at all diameters was less than the critical temperature of osteonecrosis (47°C) except for the ⌀2 drill. Statistical significance was observed in all groups when comparing sequential and simplified drilling in the ⌀3.2, ⌀3.8, and ⌀4.3 drills (P<0.001). However, in the simplified drilling procedures, the temperature was below the osteonecrosis threshold temperature (47°C) except for the ⌀4.3 drill with the omission of the previous 3 steps (⌀3.0, ⌀3.2, and ⌀3.8).

Conclusions: In general, drilling under low-speed, water-free conditions has shown stable results in terms of heat generation. Simplified drilling showed statistically significantly greater heat generation than sequential drilling. However, most of the diameters and omitted steps seem to be clinically acceptable, so it will be useful if an appropriate selection is made according to the patient's clinical condition.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在无水条件下,50转/分钟的简化钻孔程序对热生成的影响:一项体外研究。
目的:近年来,为了方便患者和外科医生,引导种植手术得到了广泛的应用。进一步简化手术程序将使植入手术更加方便。低速无水条件常用于引导种植手术。因此,在本研究中,我们试图再次确认低速无水钻井是否安全。本研究的主要目的是从产热的角度评估一种简化的钻井方案是否安全,该方案省略了钻井过程中的一些中间步骤。方法:在50 rpm、10 N·cm无水条件下钻取D1密度人工骨块,用数字红外相机测量表面温度。首先,采用最广泛使用的顺序钻井方法进行钻井。其次,对于每个钻径,在进行简化钻井时测量温度变化,省去了前面的1、2或3个步骤。结果:在连续钻孔过程中,除φ 2钻孔外,所有直径钻孔过程中产生的热量均小于骨坏死临界温度(47℃)。在顺序钻孔和简化钻孔中,在钻孔机φ 3.2、φ 3.8和φ 4.3钻孔中,各组间比较均有统计学意义(p)。结论:总体而言,低速、无水条件下的钻孔产热结果稳定。简化钻孔比顺序钻孔产生的热量在统计上显著增加。然而,大多数直径和省略的步骤似乎是临床可接受的,因此,如果根据患者的临床情况做出适当的选择,将是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science (JPIS) is a peer-reviewed and open-access journal providing up-to-date information relevant to professionalism of periodontology and dental implantology. JPIS is dedicated to global and extensive publication which includes evidence-based original articles, and fundamental reviews in order to cover a variety of interests in the field of periodontal as well as implant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信