The Professor and the Pupil: The Hermeneutical Connectedness and Theological Contributions of James H. Cone and Katie G. Cannon.

Brandon R Isome
{"title":"The Professor and the Pupil: The Hermeneutical Connectedness and Theological Contributions of James H. Cone and Katie G. Cannon.","authors":"Brandon R Isome","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article elucidates the hermeneutical and theological contributions of James H. Cone (Professor) and Katie G. Cannon (Pupil), by analyzing their methodological critiques of Christian theology, which failed to consider black experience in mainstream (white) America. Thereby unraveling distinct (black liberation and womanist theology) theological categories that addressed the marginalization of African Americans within mainstream America, while simultaneously debunking the hegemonic and patriarchal norms of Evangelical Christianity (slaveholding religion) that seeped into African American churches, under the guise of tradition. It is essential to delineate the dichotomy between Christian theology and evangelical Christianity, as both house the tents of white supremacy. A detailed topic later explored in this reflection. Recognizing the indelible impact that both theologians had on Christian theology and the black church, this article builds upon the imagery of Professor and Pupil, pays homage to the hermeneutical and theological ingenuity of Cone and Cannon, calls readers attention to a liberating hermeneutic, while exposing cantankerous practices and interpretations that persist in African American churches. It is also important to note the interchangeable nature of the terms Black and African American.</p>","PeriodicalId":73773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930479/pdf/jhsh-9-79.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article elucidates the hermeneutical and theological contributions of James H. Cone (Professor) and Katie G. Cannon (Pupil), by analyzing their methodological critiques of Christian theology, which failed to consider black experience in mainstream (white) America. Thereby unraveling distinct (black liberation and womanist theology) theological categories that addressed the marginalization of African Americans within mainstream America, while simultaneously debunking the hegemonic and patriarchal norms of Evangelical Christianity (slaveholding religion) that seeped into African American churches, under the guise of tradition. It is essential to delineate the dichotomy between Christian theology and evangelical Christianity, as both house the tents of white supremacy. A detailed topic later explored in this reflection. Recognizing the indelible impact that both theologians had on Christian theology and the black church, this article builds upon the imagery of Professor and Pupil, pays homage to the hermeneutical and theological ingenuity of Cone and Cannon, calls readers attention to a liberating hermeneutic, while exposing cantankerous practices and interpretations that persist in African American churches. It is also important to note the interchangeable nature of the terms Black and African American.

教授和学生:詹姆斯·h·科恩和凯蒂·g·坎农的解释学联系和神学贡献。
本文通过分析詹姆斯·h·科恩(教授)和凯蒂·g·坎农(学生)对基督教神学的方法论批评,阐述了他们在解释学和神学方面的贡献,这些神学批评没有考虑到美国主流(白人)中的黑人经历。从而揭示了不同的(黑人解放神学和女性主义神学)神学类别,这些神学类别解决了非洲裔美国人在美国主流中的边缘化问题,同时揭穿了福音派基督教(蓄奴宗教)的霸权和父权规范,这些规范在传统的幌子下渗透到非洲裔美国人的教会中。描绘基督教神学和福音派基督教之间的二分法是至关重要的,因为两者都是白人至上主义的帐篷。稍后将详细讨论这个问题。认识到这两位神学家对基督教神学和黑人教会的不可磨灭的影响,本文以教授和学生的形象为基础,向科恩和坎农的解释学和神学独创性致敬,呼吁读者注意一种解放的解释学,同时揭露在非裔美国人教会中持续存在的令人讨厌的做法和解释。同样重要的是要注意“黑人”和“非裔美国人”这两个术语的可互换性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信