Risk Factors and Outcomes of Stem Cell Mobilization Failure in Multiple Myeloma Patients.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Te-Lin Hsu, Chun-Kuang Tsai, Chun-Yu Liu, Chiu-Mei Yeh, Fen-Lan Lin, Liang-Tsai Hsiao, Yao-Chung Liu, Hao-Yuan Wang, Po-Shen Ko, Ting-An Lin, Wen-Chun Chen, Po-Min Chen, Jin-Hwang Liu, Jyh-Pyng Gau, Chia-Jen Liu
{"title":"Risk Factors and Outcomes of Stem Cell Mobilization Failure in Multiple Myeloma Patients.","authors":"Te-Lin Hsu,&nbsp;Chun-Kuang Tsai,&nbsp;Chun-Yu Liu,&nbsp;Chiu-Mei Yeh,&nbsp;Fen-Lan Lin,&nbsp;Liang-Tsai Hsiao,&nbsp;Yao-Chung Liu,&nbsp;Hao-Yuan Wang,&nbsp;Po-Shen Ko,&nbsp;Ting-An Lin,&nbsp;Wen-Chun Chen,&nbsp;Po-Min Chen,&nbsp;Jin-Hwang Liu,&nbsp;Jyh-Pyng Gau,&nbsp;Chia-Jen Liu","doi":"10.1159/000525565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a well-established treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and adequate stem cell collection must be assured before ASCT. However, prediction of poor mobilizers (PMs) is still difficult despite several risk factors for mobilization failure having been identified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed MM patients at Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan who underwent stem cell collection between October 2006 and August 2020. A CD34<sup>+</sup> cell collection of <1 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/kg was defined as a mobilization failure. The primary endpoint was mobilization failure. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mobilization failure were calculated using a logistic regression model. The cumulative incidence of mortality was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the multivariate analysis, absolute monocyte count <500/µL (adjusted OR 10.75, 95% CI: 1.82-63.57, <i>p</i> = 0.009), platelet count <150,000/µL (adjusted OR 12.49, 95% CI: 2.65-58.89, <i>p</i> = 0.001) before mobilization, and time interval from diagnosis to stem cell harvest ≥180 days (adjusted OR 7.69, 95% CI: 1.61-36.87, <i>p</i> = 0.011) were risk factors for PMs. PM patients had poorer OS compared to patients with successful stem cell collection in the univariate analysis (log-rank test <i>p</i> = 0.027). The predicted probability of PMs was estimated by the multiple logistic regression model with a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 84.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Absolute monocyte count <500/µL, platelet count <150,000/µL, and treatment duration more than 180 days before stem cell mobilization are risk factors for unsuccessful stem cell collection. Our prediction models have high sensitivity and specificity for mobilization failure prediction and allow for early interventions for possible PMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/93/tmh-0050-0039.PMC9912005.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525565","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a well-established treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and adequate stem cell collection must be assured before ASCT. However, prediction of poor mobilizers (PMs) is still difficult despite several risk factors for mobilization failure having been identified.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed MM patients at Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan who underwent stem cell collection between October 2006 and August 2020. A CD34+ cell collection of <1 × 106 cells/kg was defined as a mobilization failure. The primary endpoint was mobilization failure. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mobilization failure were calculated using a logistic regression model. The cumulative incidence of mortality was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: In the multivariate analysis, absolute monocyte count <500/µL (adjusted OR 10.75, 95% CI: 1.82-63.57, p = 0.009), platelet count <150,000/µL (adjusted OR 12.49, 95% CI: 2.65-58.89, p = 0.001) before mobilization, and time interval from diagnosis to stem cell harvest ≥180 days (adjusted OR 7.69, 95% CI: 1.61-36.87, p = 0.011) were risk factors for PMs. PM patients had poorer OS compared to patients with successful stem cell collection in the univariate analysis (log-rank test p = 0.027). The predicted probability of PMs was estimated by the multiple logistic regression model with a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 84.0%.

Conclusion: Absolute monocyte count <500/µL, platelet count <150,000/µL, and treatment duration more than 180 days before stem cell mobilization are risk factors for unsuccessful stem cell collection. Our prediction models have high sensitivity and specificity for mobilization failure prediction and allow for early interventions for possible PMs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多发性骨髓瘤患者干细胞动员失败的危险因素和结局。
自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT)是多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的一种成熟的治疗方法,在ASCT之前必须确保足够的干细胞收集。然而,尽管已经确定了几个动员失败的危险因素,但预测动员能力差(pm)仍然很困难。方法:我们回顾性分析了2006年10月至2020年8月在台湾台北退伍军人总医院接受干细胞收集的MM患者。CD34+细胞收集量达到6个/kg被定义为动员失败。主要终点是活动失败。次要终点是总生存期(OS)。使用逻辑回归模型计算动员失败的优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(ci)。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计累积死亡率。结果:在多因素分析中,动员前的绝对单核细胞计数p = 0.009,血小板计数p = 0.001,诊断至干细胞收获时间间隔≥180天(调整OR 7.69, 95% CI: 1.61 ~ 36.87, p = 0.011)是发生PMs的危险因素。在单变量分析中,与干细胞收集成功的患者相比,PM患者的OS较差(log-rank检验p = 0.027)。采用多元logistic回归模型估计pmms的预测概率,灵敏度为84.6%,特异性为84.0%。结论:绝对单核细胞计数
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信