Importance of external validation and subgroup analysis of artificial intelligence in the detection of low ejection fraction from electrocardiograms.

IF 3.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2022-11-02 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztac065
Ryuichiro Yagi, Shinichi Goto, Yoshinori Katsumata, Calum A MacRae, Rahul C Deo
{"title":"Importance of external validation and subgroup analysis of artificial intelligence in the detection of low ejection fraction from electrocardiograms.","authors":"Ryuichiro Yagi, Shinichi Goto, Yoshinori Katsumata, Calum A MacRae, Rahul C Deo","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztac065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) carries an increased risk for overt heart failure and mortality, yet treatable to mitigate disease progression. An artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) model demonstrated promise in LVSD screening, but the performance dropped unexpectedly in external validation. We thus sought to train <i>de novo</i> models for LVSD detection and investigated their performance across multiple institutions and across a broader set of patient strata.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>ECGs taken within 14 days of an echocardiogram were obtained from four academic hospitals (three in the United States and one in Japan). Four AI models were trained to detect patients with ejection fraction (EF) <40% using ECGs from each of the four institutions. All the models were then evaluated on the held-out test data set from the same institution and data from the three external institutions. Subgroup analyses stratified by patient characteristics and common ECG abnormalities were performed. A total of 221 846 ECGs were identified from the 4 institutions. While the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH)-trained and Keio-trained models yielded similar accuracy on their internal test data [area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) 0.913 and 0.914, respectively], external validity was worse for the Keio-trained model (AUROC: 0.905-0.915 for BWH trained and 0.849-0.877 for Keio-trained model). Although ECG abnormalities including atrial fibrillation, left bundle branch block, and paced rhythm-reduced detection, the models performed robustly across patient characteristics and other ECG features.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While using the same model architecture, different data sets produced models with different performances for detecting low-EF highlighting the importance of external validation and extensive stratification analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/b5/ztac065.PMC9779862.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) carries an increased risk for overt heart failure and mortality, yet treatable to mitigate disease progression. An artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) model demonstrated promise in LVSD screening, but the performance dropped unexpectedly in external validation. We thus sought to train de novo models for LVSD detection and investigated their performance across multiple institutions and across a broader set of patient strata.

Methods and results: ECGs taken within 14 days of an echocardiogram were obtained from four academic hospitals (three in the United States and one in Japan). Four AI models were trained to detect patients with ejection fraction (EF) <40% using ECGs from each of the four institutions. All the models were then evaluated on the held-out test data set from the same institution and data from the three external institutions. Subgroup analyses stratified by patient characteristics and common ECG abnormalities were performed. A total of 221 846 ECGs were identified from the 4 institutions. While the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH)-trained and Keio-trained models yielded similar accuracy on their internal test data [area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) 0.913 and 0.914, respectively], external validity was worse for the Keio-trained model (AUROC: 0.905-0.915 for BWH trained and 0.849-0.877 for Keio-trained model). Although ECG abnormalities including atrial fibrillation, left bundle branch block, and paced rhythm-reduced detection, the models performed robustly across patient characteristics and other ECG features.

Conclusion: While using the same model architecture, different data sets produced models with different performances for detecting low-EF highlighting the importance of external validation and extensive stratification analysis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人工智能外部验证和亚组分析在从心电图检测低射血分数中的重要性。
目的:左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)会增加明显心力衰竭和死亡的风险,但可通过治疗缓解疾病进展。人工智能(AI)支持的12导联心电图(ECG)模型在LVSD筛查中表现出了良好的前景,但在外部验证中性能却意外下降。因此,我们试图从头开始训练 LVSD 检测模型,并在多个机构和更广泛的患者群体中研究其性能:我们从四家学术医院(三家在美国,一家在日本)获取了超声心动图检查后 14 天内的心电图。对四种人工智能模型进行了训练,以检测射血分数(EF)结论的患者:虽然使用了相同的模型结构,但不同的数据集产生的模型在检测低射血分数时表现各异,这凸显了外部验证和广泛分层分析的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信