Simone Fezzi, Jiayue Huang, Mattia Lunardi, Daixin Ding, Flavio L Ribichini, Shengxian Tu, William Wijns
{"title":"Coronary physiology in the catheterisation laboratory: an A to Z practical guide.","authors":"Simone Fezzi, Jiayue Huang, Mattia Lunardi, Daixin Ding, Flavio L Ribichini, Shengxian Tu, William Wijns","doi":"10.4244/AIJ-D-22-00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronary revascularisation, either percutaneous or surgical, aims to improve coronary flow and relieve myocardial ischaemia. The decision-making process in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains largely based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA), even though until recently ICA could not assess the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses. Invasive wire-based approaches for physiological evaluations were developed to properly assess the ischaemic relevance of epicardial CAD. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and later, instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), were shown to improve clinical outcomes in several patient subsets when used for coronary revascularisation guidance or deferral and for procedural optimisation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results. Despite accumulating evidence and positive guideline recommendations, the adoption of invasive physiology has remained quite low, mainly due to technical and economic issues as well as to operator-resistance to change. Coronary image-based computational physiology has been recently developed, with promising results in terms of accuracy and a reduction in computational time, costs, radiation exposure and risks for the patient. Lastly, the integration of intracoronary imaging and physiology allows for individualised PCI treatment, aiming at complete relief of ischaemia through optimised morpho-functional immediate procedural results. Instead of a conventional state-of-the-art review, this A to Z dictionary attempts to provide a practical guide for the application of coronary physiology in the catheterisation laboratory, exploring several methods, their pitfalls, and useful tips and tricks.</p>","PeriodicalId":72310,"journal":{"name":"AsiaIntervention","volume":"8 2","pages":"86-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890586/pdf/AIJ-D-22-00022_Fezzi.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AsiaIntervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/AIJ-D-22-00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Coronary revascularisation, either percutaneous or surgical, aims to improve coronary flow and relieve myocardial ischaemia. The decision-making process in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains largely based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA), even though until recently ICA could not assess the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses. Invasive wire-based approaches for physiological evaluations were developed to properly assess the ischaemic relevance of epicardial CAD. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and later, instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), were shown to improve clinical outcomes in several patient subsets when used for coronary revascularisation guidance or deferral and for procedural optimisation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results. Despite accumulating evidence and positive guideline recommendations, the adoption of invasive physiology has remained quite low, mainly due to technical and economic issues as well as to operator-resistance to change. Coronary image-based computational physiology has been recently developed, with promising results in terms of accuracy and a reduction in computational time, costs, radiation exposure and risks for the patient. Lastly, the integration of intracoronary imaging and physiology allows for individualised PCI treatment, aiming at complete relief of ischaemia through optimised morpho-functional immediate procedural results. Instead of a conventional state-of-the-art review, this A to Z dictionary attempts to provide a practical guide for the application of coronary physiology in the catheterisation laboratory, exploring several methods, their pitfalls, and useful tips and tricks.
经皮或外科冠状动脉再通术旨在改善冠状动脉血流,缓解心肌缺血。冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的决策过程仍主要基于有创冠状动脉造影术(ICA),尽管直到最近,ICA 仍无法评估冠状动脉狭窄的功能意义。为了正确评估心外膜 CAD 的缺血性相关性,人们开发了基于导线的侵入性生理评估方法。事实证明,分数血流储备(FFR)以及后来的瞬时无波比率(iFR)在用于冠状动脉血运重建指导或推迟以及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)结果的程序优化时,可改善多个患者亚组的临床预后。尽管证据和指南建议不断积累,但有创生理学的采用率仍然很低,主要原因是技术和经济问题以及操作者对改变的抵触。基于冠状动脉图像的计算生理学最近得到了发展,在准确性、减少计算时间、成本、辐射暴露和患者风险方面取得了可喜的成果。最后,冠状动脉内成像与生理学的整合可实现个体化 PCI 治疗,通过优化形态功能的即时程序结果,达到彻底缓解缺血的目的。这本从 A 到 Z 的字典不是传统的最新技术综述,而是试图为冠状动脉生理学在导管室的应用提供实用指南,探讨几种方法、其误区以及有用的技巧和窍门。