IVUS determination of normal left main stem artery size and plaque burden, and correlation with body surface area in an Indian population.

Kirti Punamiya, Tanya Jha, Varun Punamiya, Jasmine Pradhan
{"title":"IVUS determination of normal left main stem artery size and plaque burden, and correlation with body surface area in an Indian population.","authors":"Kirti Punamiya,&nbsp;Tanya Jha,&nbsp;Varun Punamiya,&nbsp;Jasmine Pradhan","doi":"10.4244/AIJ-D-22-00041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a scarcity of data regarding the normal size of the left main stem coronary artery (LMS) in the Indian population; further data are needed to help determine the optimal device size during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of our study was to determine the normal size of the LMS and to calculate the mean plaque burden (PB) in the left main arteries which are angiographically normal or insignificantly diseased, using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We hoped to establish a correlation between LMS size and body surface area (BSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected demographic and coronary artery data from 140 patients who underwent IVUS-guided PCI in the left anterior descending and circumflex arteries over a 2-year period from 2019 to 2020, where a pullback sequence of the LMS was available. The reference and luminal vessel diameters, the reference and luminal vessel areas and the mean plaque burden (PB) were obtained. Regression analysis was used to develop a correlation between BSA and LMS diameter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IVUS-determined mean reference diameter of the LMS was 5.53±0.63 mm and the mean luminal diameter was 4.62±0.65 mm. The mean reference vessel area was 24.79±5.5 mm<sup>2</sup> and the luminal vessel area was 17.19±4.89 mm<sup>2</sup>. The mean PB was found to be 29.21% in patients with an angiographically normal left main and 32.29% in patients with angiographically insignificant left main stenosis. A linear correlation was noted between the left main reference and luminal vessel diameters; the correlation equations derived were 3.57+1.01 BSA and 2.95+0.87 BSA, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mean reference and luminal diameters of LMS in the Indian population are on par with the size of LMS in other ethnicities. The vessel compensates for up to 40% PB with vessel remodelling. Hence, a PB of 40% is a good landing zone for stent deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":72310,"journal":{"name":"AsiaIntervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890579/pdf/AIJ-D-22-00041_Punamiya.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AsiaIntervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/AIJ-D-22-00041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a scarcity of data regarding the normal size of the left main stem coronary artery (LMS) in the Indian population; further data are needed to help determine the optimal device size during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Aims: The aim of our study was to determine the normal size of the LMS and to calculate the mean plaque burden (PB) in the left main arteries which are angiographically normal or insignificantly diseased, using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We hoped to establish a correlation between LMS size and body surface area (BSA).

Methods: We collected demographic and coronary artery data from 140 patients who underwent IVUS-guided PCI in the left anterior descending and circumflex arteries over a 2-year period from 2019 to 2020, where a pullback sequence of the LMS was available. The reference and luminal vessel diameters, the reference and luminal vessel areas and the mean plaque burden (PB) were obtained. Regression analysis was used to develop a correlation between BSA and LMS diameter.

Results: The IVUS-determined mean reference diameter of the LMS was 5.53±0.63 mm and the mean luminal diameter was 4.62±0.65 mm. The mean reference vessel area was 24.79±5.5 mm2 and the luminal vessel area was 17.19±4.89 mm2. The mean PB was found to be 29.21% in patients with an angiographically normal left main and 32.29% in patients with angiographically insignificant left main stenosis. A linear correlation was noted between the left main reference and luminal vessel diameters; the correlation equations derived were 3.57+1.01 BSA and 2.95+0.87 BSA, respectively.

Conclusions: The mean reference and luminal diameters of LMS in the Indian population are on par with the size of LMS in other ethnicities. The vessel compensates for up to 40% PB with vessel remodelling. Hence, a PB of 40% is a good landing zone for stent deployment.

IVUS测定印度人群正常左主干动脉大小和斑块负荷及其与体表面积的相关性
背景:关于印度人群左主干冠状动脉(LMS)正常大小的数据缺乏;需要进一步的数据来帮助确定经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中的最佳装置尺寸。目的:我们研究的目的是利用血管内超声(IVUS)确定LMS的正常大小,并计算血管造影正常或无明显病变的左主干动脉的平均斑块负荷(PB)。我们希望建立LMS大小与体表面积(BSA)之间的相关性。方法:我们收集了140例患者的人口统计学和冠状动脉数据,这些患者在2019年至2020年的2年时间里接受了ivus引导的左前降支和旋支动脉PCI,其中LMS的回拉序列是可用的。获得参考血管直径和管腔直径、参考血管面积和平均斑块负荷(PB)。采用回归分析建立了BSA与LMS直径之间的相关性。结果:ivus测定的LMS平均参考直径为5.53±0.63 mm,平均腔径为4.62±0.65 mm。平均参考血管面积为24.79±5.5 mm2,管腔血管面积为17.19±4.89 mm2。左主干血管造影正常患者的平均PB为29.21%,左主干血管造影不明显患者的平均PB为32.29%。左主参考血管直径与腔内血管直径呈线性相关;得到的相关方程分别为3.57+1.01 BSA和2.95+0.87 BSA。结论:印度人口LMS的平均参考直径和管径与其他种族LMS的大小相当。血管通过血管重塑来补偿高达40%的PB。因此,40%的PB是支架部署的良好着陆区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信