Positive attention bias in high socially anxious individuals: Evidence from an ERP study

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sutao Song , Shimeng Zhao , Ting Jiang , Shuang Li , Mingxian Zhang , Wangang Ren , Yuanjie Zheng , Ruiyang Ge
{"title":"Positive attention bias in high socially anxious individuals: Evidence from an ERP study","authors":"Sutao Song ,&nbsp;Shimeng Zhao ,&nbsp;Ting Jiang ,&nbsp;Shuang Li ,&nbsp;Mingxian Zhang ,&nbsp;Wangang Ren ,&nbsp;Yuanjie Zheng ,&nbsp;Ruiyang Ge","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Bivalent Fear of Evaluation (BFEO) model posits that the fear of positive evaluation (FPE) is a core feature of social anxiety. As such, high socially anxious individuals may show attention bias when faced with positive stimuli. However, most of the previous studies focused on the negative attention bias of social anxiety, and less on the attention bias of positive stimuli. Meanwhile, the effect of stimulus presentation time on the attention bias pattern was unclear. In order to investigate this question, we used a dot-probe paradigm with facial expressions (happy, fearful, angry, neutral) presented for 100 ms and 500 ms. The ERP results showed: (1) For high socially anxious group, happy faces elicited a larger N1 for valid than for invalid cued probes, whereas for healthy control group, angry faces elicited a larger N1 for valid than for invalid cued probes. (2) When valid cues following happy faces presented for 500 ms, the N1 amplitude was larger than that of invalid cues. However, when valid cues following angry and fear faces presented for 100 ms, the N1 amplitude was larger than that of invalid cues. The results showed difficulty in attention disengagement of high socially anxious individuals from positive stimuli, as reflected by N1, illustrating the positive attention bias in social anxiety. These results prove that FPE may contribute to maintaining social anxiety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"319 ","pages":"Pages 300-308"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032722010928","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Bivalent Fear of Evaluation (BFEO) model posits that the fear of positive evaluation (FPE) is a core feature of social anxiety. As such, high socially anxious individuals may show attention bias when faced with positive stimuli. However, most of the previous studies focused on the negative attention bias of social anxiety, and less on the attention bias of positive stimuli. Meanwhile, the effect of stimulus presentation time on the attention bias pattern was unclear. In order to investigate this question, we used a dot-probe paradigm with facial expressions (happy, fearful, angry, neutral) presented for 100 ms and 500 ms. The ERP results showed: (1) For high socially anxious group, happy faces elicited a larger N1 for valid than for invalid cued probes, whereas for healthy control group, angry faces elicited a larger N1 for valid than for invalid cued probes. (2) When valid cues following happy faces presented for 500 ms, the N1 amplitude was larger than that of invalid cues. However, when valid cues following angry and fear faces presented for 100 ms, the N1 amplitude was larger than that of invalid cues. The results showed difficulty in attention disengagement of high socially anxious individuals from positive stimuli, as reflected by N1, illustrating the positive attention bias in social anxiety. These results prove that FPE may contribute to maintaining social anxiety.

高社交焦虑个体的积极注意偏倚:来自ERP研究的证据
二价评价恐惧(BFEO)模型认为,积极评价恐惧(FPE)是社交焦虑的核心特征。因此,高社交焦虑个体在面对积极刺激时可能表现出注意偏差。然而,以往的研究大多集中在社交焦虑的负向注意偏倚上,而对积极刺激的注意偏倚研究较少。同时,刺激呈现时间对注意偏向模式的影响尚不清楚。为了研究这个问题,我们使用了一个点探针范式,在100毫秒和500毫秒的时间里呈现面部表情(快乐、恐惧、愤怒、中性)。结果表明:(1)在高社交焦虑组中,快乐面孔诱发的有效提示探针的N1值大于无效提示探针的N1值,而在健康对照组中,愤怒面孔诱发的有效提示探针的N1值大于无效提示探针。(2)当快乐面孔后有效线索呈现时间为500ms时,N1幅值大于无效线索。然而,当愤怒和恐惧面孔后的有效线索持续100 ms时,N1振幅大于无效线索。结果表明,高社交焦虑个体在正性刺激下难以实现注意脱离,这反映了社交焦虑个体的正性注意偏倚。这些结果证明FPE可能有助于维持社交焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信