Cerebral blood flow response to cardiorespiratory oscillations in healthy humans

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Nathalie Linn Anikken Holme, Ilias Zilakos, Maja Elstad, Maria Skytioti
{"title":"Cerebral blood flow response to cardiorespiratory oscillations in healthy humans","authors":"Nathalie Linn Anikken Holme,&nbsp;Ilias Zilakos,&nbsp;Maja Elstad,&nbsp;Maria Skytioti","doi":"10.1016/j.autneu.2022.103069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) characterizes the cerebral blood flow (CBF) response to abrupt changes in </span>arterial blood pressure (ABP). CA operates at frequencies below 0.15 Hz. ABP regulation and probably CA are modified by autonomic nervous activity. We investigated the CBF response and CA dynamics to mild increase in sympathetic activity.</p><p>Twelve healthy volunteers underwent oscillatory lower body negative pressure (oLBNP), which induced respiratory-related ABP oscillations at an average of 0.22 Hz. We recorded blood velocity in the internal carotid artery<span> (ICA) by Doppler ultrasound and ABP. We quantified variability and peak wavelet power of ABP and ICA blood velocity by wavelet analysis at low frequency (LF, 0.05–0.15 Hz) and Mayer waves (0.08–0.12 Hz), respectively. CA was quantified by calculation of the wavelet synchronization gamma index for the pair ABP–ICA blood velocity in the LF and Mayer wave band.</span></p><p>oLBNP increased ABP peak wavelet power at the Mayer wave frequency. At the Mayer wave, ABP peak wavelet power increased by &gt;70 % from rest to oLBNP (<em>p</em><span> &lt; 0.05), while ICA blood flow velocity peak wavelet power was unchanged, and gamma index increased (from 0.49 to 0.69, </span><em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). At LF, variability in both ABP and ICA blood velocity and gamma index were unchanged from rest to oLBNP.</p><p>Despite an increased gamma index at Mayer wave, ICA blood flow variability was unchanged during increased ABP variability. The increased synchronization during oLBNP did not cause less stable CBF or less active CA. Sympathetic activation seems to improve the mechanisms of CA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55410,"journal":{"name":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156607022200128X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) characterizes the cerebral blood flow (CBF) response to abrupt changes in arterial blood pressure (ABP). CA operates at frequencies below 0.15 Hz. ABP regulation and probably CA are modified by autonomic nervous activity. We investigated the CBF response and CA dynamics to mild increase in sympathetic activity.

Twelve healthy volunteers underwent oscillatory lower body negative pressure (oLBNP), which induced respiratory-related ABP oscillations at an average of 0.22 Hz. We recorded blood velocity in the internal carotid artery (ICA) by Doppler ultrasound and ABP. We quantified variability and peak wavelet power of ABP and ICA blood velocity by wavelet analysis at low frequency (LF, 0.05–0.15 Hz) and Mayer waves (0.08–0.12 Hz), respectively. CA was quantified by calculation of the wavelet synchronization gamma index for the pair ABP–ICA blood velocity in the LF and Mayer wave band.

oLBNP increased ABP peak wavelet power at the Mayer wave frequency. At the Mayer wave, ABP peak wavelet power increased by >70 % from rest to oLBNP (p < 0.05), while ICA blood flow velocity peak wavelet power was unchanged, and gamma index increased (from 0.49 to 0.69, p < 0.05). At LF, variability in both ABP and ICA blood velocity and gamma index were unchanged from rest to oLBNP.

Despite an increased gamma index at Mayer wave, ICA blood flow variability was unchanged during increased ABP variability. The increased synchronization during oLBNP did not cause less stable CBF or less active CA. Sympathetic activation seems to improve the mechanisms of CA.

健康人脑血流对心肺振荡的反应
动态大脑自动调节(CA)表征了大脑血流量(CBF)对动脉血压(ABP)突然变化的反应。CA在低于0.15Hz的频率下工作。ABP调节和CA可能受到自主神经活动的影响。我们研究了CBF对交感神经活动轻度增加的反应和CA动力学。12名健康志愿者接受了振荡下半身负压(oLBNP),该负压诱导了平均0.22Hz的呼吸相关ABP振荡。我们通过多普勒超声和ABP记录了颈内动脉(ICA)的血流速度。我们分别在低频(LF,0.05–0.15 Hz)和Mayer波(0.08–0.12 Hz)下通过小波分析量化了ABP和ICA血流速度的可变性和峰值小波功率。通过计算LF和Mayer波段ABP–ICA对血流速度的小波同步伽马指数来量化CA。LBNP增加了Mayer波段的ABP峰值小波功率。在Mayer波处,ABP峰值小波功率增加>;70%从静止到oLBNP(p<;0.05),而ICA血流速度峰值小波功率不变,伽马指数增加(从0.49增加到0.69,p<;05)。尽管Mayer波的伽马指数增加,但在ABP变异性增加期间,ICA血流变异性没有变化。oLBNP过程中同步性的增加并没有导致CBF不稳定或CA活性降低。交感神经激活似乎改善了CA的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: This is an international journal with broad coverage of all aspects of the autonomic nervous system in man and animals. The main areas of interest include the innervation of blood vessels and viscera, autonomic ganglia, efferent and afferent autonomic pathways, and autonomic nuclei and pathways in the central nervous system. The Editors will consider papers that deal with any aspect of the autonomic nervous system, including structure, physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, development, evolution, ageing, behavioural aspects, integrative role and influence on emotional and physical states of the body. Interdisciplinary studies will be encouraged. Studies dealing with human pathology will be also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信