Evaluation of online interprofessional simulation workshops for obstetric and neonatal emergencies.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Namrata Prasad, Shavi Fernando, Sue Willey, Kym Davey, Jennifer Hocking, Atul Malhotra, Arunaz Kumar
{"title":"Evaluation of online interprofessional simulation workshops for obstetric and neonatal emergencies.","authors":"Namrata Prasad,&nbsp;Shavi Fernando,&nbsp;Sue Willey,&nbsp;Kym Davey,&nbsp;Jennifer Hocking,&nbsp;Atul Malhotra,&nbsp;Arunaz Kumar","doi":"10.5116/ijme.6342.9214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore student perceptions of learning and interprofessional aspects of obstetric and neonatal emergencies through online simulation-based workshops.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted at Monash University, Australia. Data were obtained from six separate online Obstetric Neonatal Emergency Simulation workshops held between May 2020 and August 2021. A total of 385 students attended and were invited to participate in the study by completing an online survey two-three weeks later. Of the attendees, 144 students completed the survey (95 medical, 45 midwifery), equating to a response rate of 37%. Survey responses were downloaded from online survey platform and separated into medical and midwifery responses. Thematic analysis of data was performed using a coding framework, resulting in development of themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Main themes were adaptability, connectivism, preparedness for practice, experiential learning, learning through modelling and dynamics of online interaction. Students reported that online workshop was a useful alternative method to experience simulation-based learning, increase their readiness for clinical practice and foster positive interprofessional relationships. Consistent with existing literature evaluating similar in-person programs, midwifery students were most interested in interprofessional interaction (predominant theme: dynamics of online interaction), whilst medical students were more concerned with developing clinical skills (predominant themes: learning through modelling, experiential learning).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online learning may be a useful and convenient way of delivering interprofessional simulation-based education during the pandemic, in remote areas and as an adjunct to in-person teaching. Future studies should evaluate the impact of online learning with a mixed methods study and in comparison, to in-person programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"13 ","pages":"287-304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911278/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.6342.9214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: To explore student perceptions of learning and interprofessional aspects of obstetric and neonatal emergencies through online simulation-based workshops.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted at Monash University, Australia. Data were obtained from six separate online Obstetric Neonatal Emergency Simulation workshops held between May 2020 and August 2021. A total of 385 students attended and were invited to participate in the study by completing an online survey two-three weeks later. Of the attendees, 144 students completed the survey (95 medical, 45 midwifery), equating to a response rate of 37%. Survey responses were downloaded from online survey platform and separated into medical and midwifery responses. Thematic analysis of data was performed using a coding framework, resulting in development of themes and subthemes.

Results: Main themes were adaptability, connectivism, preparedness for practice, experiential learning, learning through modelling and dynamics of online interaction. Students reported that online workshop was a useful alternative method to experience simulation-based learning, increase their readiness for clinical practice and foster positive interprofessional relationships. Consistent with existing literature evaluating similar in-person programs, midwifery students were most interested in interprofessional interaction (predominant theme: dynamics of online interaction), whilst medical students were more concerned with developing clinical skills (predominant themes: learning through modelling, experiential learning).

Conclusions: Online learning may be a useful and convenient way of delivering interprofessional simulation-based education during the pandemic, in remote areas and as an adjunct to in-person teaching. Future studies should evaluate the impact of online learning with a mixed methods study and in comparison, to in-person programs.

Abstract Image

评估产科和新生儿紧急情况在线跨专业模拟讲习班。
目的:通过基于在线模拟的研讨会,探讨学生对产科和新生儿急诊的学习和跨专业方面的看法。方法:本定性研究在澳大利亚莫纳什大学进行。数据来自2020年5月至2021年8月期间举行的六次独立的在线产科新生儿紧急情况模拟讲习班。共有385名学生参加了这项研究,并被邀请在两到三周后完成一项在线调查。在参与者中,144名学生完成了调查(95名医学学生,45名助产学生),相当于37%的回复率。调查回复从在线调查平台下载,分为医疗回复和助产回复。使用编码框架对数据进行了专题分析,从而制定了主题和分主题。结果:主题为适应性、联系主义、实践准备、体验式学习、建模学习和在线互动动态。学生们报告说,在线研讨会是一种有用的替代方法,可以体验基于模拟的学习,为临床实践做好准备,并培养积极的跨专业关系。与现有评估类似面对面课程的文献一致,助产学学生对专业间互动最感兴趣(主要主题:在线互动的动态),而医科学生更关心发展临床技能(主要主题:通过建模和体验式学习进行学习)。结论:在疫情大流行期间,在偏远地区,在线学习可能是提供跨专业模拟教育的一种有用和方便的方式,并可作为面对面教学的辅助手段。未来的研究应该通过混合方法的研究来评估在线学习的影响,并与面对面的课程进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信