Usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography to predict residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1177/15910199221143259
Jieun Roh, Seung Kug Baik, Jeong A Yeom, Kyung-Pil Park, Sung-Ho Ahn, Min-Gyu Park
{"title":"Usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography to predict residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting.","authors":"Jieun Roh, Seung Kug Baik, Jeong A Yeom, Kyung-Pil Park, Sung-Ho Ahn, Min-Gyu Park","doi":"10.1177/15910199221143259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The long-term durability of carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be determined by various factors; however, residual stenosis is a known risk factor for in-stent restenosis. The authors of this article utilized cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in angiosuite to investigate plaque features affecting the character and quality of stent expansion after CAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two CAS cases with both pre- and post-CAS CBCT evaluations were included in this retrospective analysis. Five features derived from pre-CAS images were tested: (1) eccentricity, (2) overballoon, (3) maximum plaque thickness, (4) calcification barrier, and (5) stenotic degree. For post-CAS CBCT, stent configuration was assessed if the stent was expanded and oval or round in shape as well as outward or inward in orientation. Variables were tested if they were associated with oval expansion, outward expansion, and 20% residual stenosis after CAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Oval or outward expansion is directly related to residual stenosis. The oval expansion was associated with maximum plaque thickness, and outward expansion was associated with the presence of a calcification barrier. Variables related to > 20% residual stenosis were the maximum plaque thickness, calcification barrier, and pre-CAS stenotic degree.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBCT for carotid stenosis may provide valuable information about plaque features, especially calcification features that may interfere with the angioplasty effect, as well as the characteristics and quality of stent expansion. Residual stenosis > 20% was associated with calcification barrier, maximum plaque thickness, and pre-CAS stenotic degree.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199221143259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The long-term durability of carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be determined by various factors; however, residual stenosis is a known risk factor for in-stent restenosis. The authors of this article utilized cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in angiosuite to investigate plaque features affecting the character and quality of stent expansion after CAS.

Methods: Forty-two CAS cases with both pre- and post-CAS CBCT evaluations were included in this retrospective analysis. Five features derived from pre-CAS images were tested: (1) eccentricity, (2) overballoon, (3) maximum plaque thickness, (4) calcification barrier, and (5) stenotic degree. For post-CAS CBCT, stent configuration was assessed if the stent was expanded and oval or round in shape as well as outward or inward in orientation. Variables were tested if they were associated with oval expansion, outward expansion, and 20% residual stenosis after CAS.

Results: Oval or outward expansion is directly related to residual stenosis. The oval expansion was associated with maximum plaque thickness, and outward expansion was associated with the presence of a calcification barrier. Variables related to > 20% residual stenosis were the maximum plaque thickness, calcification barrier, and pre-CAS stenotic degree.

Conclusions: CBCT for carotid stenosis may provide valuable information about plaque features, especially calcification features that may interfere with the angioplasty effect, as well as the characteristics and quality of stent expansion. Residual stenosis > 20% was associated with calcification barrier, maximum plaque thickness, and pre-CAS stenotic degree.

锥束计算机断层扫描预测颈动脉支架术后残余狭窄的实用性。
目的:颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)的长期耐久性可能由多种因素决定;然而,残余狭窄是支架内再狭窄的已知风险因素。本文作者利用血管内锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)研究了影响 CAS 后支架扩张特征和质量的斑块特征:本次回顾性分析纳入了 42 例 CAS 病例,这些病例均接受了 CAS 前和 CAS 后的 CBCT 评估。测试了从CAS前图像中得出的五个特征:(1)偏心率;(2)过球;(3)最大斑块厚度;(4)钙化屏障;(5)狭窄程度。对于 CAS 后 CBCT,如果支架膨胀,形状为椭圆形或圆形,方向为向外或向内,则对支架构造进行评估。检测变量是否与椭圆形扩张、向外扩张以及 CAS 后 20% 残余狭窄相关:结果:椭圆形或向外扩张与残余狭窄直接相关。椭圆形扩张与最大斑块厚度有关,向外扩张与钙化屏障的存在有关。最大斑块厚度、钙化屏障和CAS前狭窄程度与残余狭窄> 20%相关:CBCT检查颈动脉狭窄可提供有关斑块特征的宝贵信息,尤其是可能干扰血管成形术效果的钙化特征,以及支架扩张的特征和质量。残余狭窄>20%与钙化障碍、最大斑块厚度和CAS前狭窄程度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信