Re-thinking the online distance instruction based on students' feedback.

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ivana Simonova, Ludmila Faltynkova, Katerina Kostolanyova, Slavomira Klimszova
{"title":"Re-thinking the online distance instruction based on students' feedback.","authors":"Ivana Simonova,&nbsp;Ludmila Faltynkova,&nbsp;Katerina Kostolanyova,&nbsp;Slavomira Klimszova","doi":"10.1007/s12528-022-09332-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the covid-19 pandemic, schools at all levels were often closed and online distance instruction (ODI) was applied. The main objective of this research was to discover the main didactic features of online distance instruction; and based on the collected data to define didactic recommendations towards improving the quality of the process. Five hypotheses were set that evaluated students' opinions in the areas of teachers' support for learners within ODI, types of sources exploited within ODI, means used for practising and fixing new knowledge within ODI, assessment of learners' performance within ODI, and students' feedback on ODI. In total, 272 respondents from upper secondary and higher education institutions participated in the research. Each respondent described the process of online distance instruction in two courses they selected of 64: (1) in a course that they appreciated, liked, enjoyed, and considered efficient from the point of view of their learning; (2) in a course that caused them discomfort in learning, as it was conducted in a way that did not suit them, and their learning did not bring the expected learning outcomes. Data were collected via a questionnaire; Chí-square test, adjusted residuals, and <i>t</i> test for comparison of means were calculated. Before the research started, teachers were trained in online distance instruction. Therefore, we expected that they will be competent in designing online distance courses and the courses will follow didactic principles. The results discovered significant differences in the frequency of occurrence of observed features in courses that received positive feedback compared to those having negative evaluation. However, some exceptions were detected.</p>","PeriodicalId":15404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","volume":"35 1","pages":"6-39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375588/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09332-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

During the covid-19 pandemic, schools at all levels were often closed and online distance instruction (ODI) was applied. The main objective of this research was to discover the main didactic features of online distance instruction; and based on the collected data to define didactic recommendations towards improving the quality of the process. Five hypotheses were set that evaluated students' opinions in the areas of teachers' support for learners within ODI, types of sources exploited within ODI, means used for practising and fixing new knowledge within ODI, assessment of learners' performance within ODI, and students' feedback on ODI. In total, 272 respondents from upper secondary and higher education institutions participated in the research. Each respondent described the process of online distance instruction in two courses they selected of 64: (1) in a course that they appreciated, liked, enjoyed, and considered efficient from the point of view of their learning; (2) in a course that caused them discomfort in learning, as it was conducted in a way that did not suit them, and their learning did not bring the expected learning outcomes. Data were collected via a questionnaire; Chí-square test, adjusted residuals, and t test for comparison of means were calculated. Before the research started, teachers were trained in online distance instruction. Therefore, we expected that they will be competent in designing online distance courses and the courses will follow didactic principles. The results discovered significant differences in the frequency of occurrence of observed features in courses that received positive feedback compared to those having negative evaluation. However, some exceptions were detected.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于学生反馈对网络远程教学的再思考
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,各级学校经常关闭,并采用在线远程教学(ODI)。本研究的主要目的是发现在线远程教学的主要教学特征;并根据收集到的数据来定义教学建议,以提高过程的质量。设置了五个假设,以评估学生在ODI中教师对学习者的支持、ODI中开发的资源类型、ODI中用于实践和固定新知识的手段、ODI中学习者表现的评估以及学生对ODI的反馈等领域的意见。共有272名来自高中和高等教育机构的受访者参与了这项研究。每位受访者描述了他们在64门课程中选择的两门课程的在线远程教学过程:(1)从学习的角度来看,他们欣赏、喜欢、享受并认为有效的课程;(2)在一门让他们感到不舒服的课程中学习,因为该课程的授课方式不适合他们,他们的学习没有带来预期的学习成果。数据通过问卷收集;计算Chí-square检验、调整残差和均值比较的t检验。在研究开始之前,教师接受了在线远程教学的培训。因此,我们期望他们能够有能力设计在线远程课程,课程将遵循教学原则。结果发现,在接受正面评价的课程中,观察到的特征出现的频率与接受负面评价的课程有显著差异。但是,检测到一些异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Journal of Computing in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Journal of Computing in Higher Education (JCHE) contributes to our understanding of the design, development, and implementation of instructional processes and technologies in higher education. JCHE publishes original research, literature reviews, implementation and evaluation studies, and theoretical, conceptual, and policy papers that provide perspectives on instructional technology’s role in improving access, affordability, and outcomes of postsecondary education.  Priority is given to well-documented original papers that demonstrate a strong grounding in learning theory and/or rigorous educational research design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信