Body Pitch Together With Translational Body Motion Biases the Subjective Haptic Vertical.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Chia-Huei Tseng, Hiu Mei Chow, Lothar Spillmann, Matt Oxner, Kenzo Sakurai
{"title":"Body Pitch Together With Translational Body Motion Biases the Subjective Haptic Vertical.","authors":"Chia-Huei Tseng,&nbsp;Hiu Mei Chow,&nbsp;Lothar Spillmann,&nbsp;Matt Oxner,&nbsp;Kenzo Sakurai","doi":"10.1163/22134808-bja10086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate perception of verticality is critical for postural maintenance and successful physical interaction with the world. Although previous research has examined the independent influences of body orientation and self-motion under well-controlled laboratory conditions, these factors are constantly changing and interacting in the real world. In this study, we examine the subjective haptic vertical in a real-world scenario. Here, we report a bias of verticality perception in a field experiment on the Hong Kong Peak Tram as participants traveled on a slope ranging from 6° to 26°. Mean subjective haptic vertical (SHV) increased with slope by as much as 15°, regardless of whether the eyes were open (Experiment 1) or closed (Experiment 2). Shifting the body pitch by a fixed degree in an effort to compensate for the mountain slope failed to reduce the verticality bias (Experiment 3). These manipulations separately rule out visual and vestibular inputs about absolute body pitch as contributors to our observed bias. Observations collected on a tram traveling on level ground (Experiment 4A) or in a static dental chair with a range of inclinations similar to those encountered on the mountain tram (Experiment 4B) showed no significant deviation of the subjective vertical from gravity. We conclude that the SHV error is due to a combination of large, dynamic body pitch and translational motion. These observations made in a real-world scenario represent an incentive to neuroscientists and aviation experts alike for studying perceived verticality under field conditions and raising awareness of dangerous misperceptions of verticality when body pitch and translational self-motion come together.</p>","PeriodicalId":51298,"journal":{"name":"Multisensory Research","volume":"36 1","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multisensory Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate perception of verticality is critical for postural maintenance and successful physical interaction with the world. Although previous research has examined the independent influences of body orientation and self-motion under well-controlled laboratory conditions, these factors are constantly changing and interacting in the real world. In this study, we examine the subjective haptic vertical in a real-world scenario. Here, we report a bias of verticality perception in a field experiment on the Hong Kong Peak Tram as participants traveled on a slope ranging from 6° to 26°. Mean subjective haptic vertical (SHV) increased with slope by as much as 15°, regardless of whether the eyes were open (Experiment 1) or closed (Experiment 2). Shifting the body pitch by a fixed degree in an effort to compensate for the mountain slope failed to reduce the verticality bias (Experiment 3). These manipulations separately rule out visual and vestibular inputs about absolute body pitch as contributors to our observed bias. Observations collected on a tram traveling on level ground (Experiment 4A) or in a static dental chair with a range of inclinations similar to those encountered on the mountain tram (Experiment 4B) showed no significant deviation of the subjective vertical from gravity. We conclude that the SHV error is due to a combination of large, dynamic body pitch and translational motion. These observations made in a real-world scenario represent an incentive to neuroscientists and aviation experts alike for studying perceived verticality under field conditions and raising awareness of dangerous misperceptions of verticality when body pitch and translational self-motion come together.

身体俯仰与平移身体运动一起使主观触觉产生垂直偏差。
对垂直度的准确感知对于保持姿势和成功地与外界进行身体互动至关重要。虽然之前的研究已经在控制良好的实验室条件下考察了身体方向和自我运动的独立影响,但这些因素在现实世界中是不断变化和相互作用的。在这项研究中,我们在现实世界的场景中检查主观触觉垂直。在这里,我们报告了在香港山顶缆车的现场实验中,当参与者在6°到26°的斜坡上行驶时,垂直感知的偏差。无论眼睛是睁着的(实验1)还是闭着的(实验2),平均主观触觉垂直度(SHV)随坡度增加最多可达15°。通过固定程度的身体俯仰来补偿山体坡度并不能减少垂直度偏差(实验3)。这些操作分别排除了视觉和前庭输入对绝对身体俯仰的影响,这些输入是我们观察到的偏差的原因。在平地上行驶的有轨电车(实验4A)或在与山上有轨电车相似的倾斜范围的静态牙科椅(实验4B)上收集的观察结果显示,主观垂直方向与重力没有明显偏差。我们得出的结论是,SHV误差是由于大的,动态的身体俯仰和平移运动的结合。这些在现实世界中观察到的结果,激励了神经科学家和航空专家们在野外条件下研究感知垂直度,并提高了人们对身体俯仰和平移自我运动结合在一起时对垂直度的危险误解的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Multisensory Research
Multisensory Research BIOPHYSICS-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Multisensory Research is an interdisciplinary archival journal covering all aspects of multisensory processing including the control of action, cognition and attention. Research using any approach to increase our understanding of multisensory perceptual, behavioural, neural and computational mechanisms is encouraged. Empirical, neurophysiological, psychophysical, brain imaging, clinical, developmental, mathematical and computational analyses are welcome. Research will also be considered covering multisensory applications such as sensory substitution, crossmodal methods for delivering sensory information or multisensory approaches to robotics and engineering. Short communications and technical notes that draw attention to new developments will be included, as will reviews and commentaries on current issues. Special issues dealing with specific topics will be announced from time to time. Multisensory Research is a continuation of Seeing and Perceiving, and of Spatial Vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信