Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy safe in chronic kidney disease patients!!!

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Pramod Adiga, Sanjay Ramachandra Pudakalkatti, V Shivakumar, Mayank Jain, R Navaneeth Sreenidhi, C S Manohar, Sreenivas Jayaram, M Nagabhushan, Ramaiah Keshavamurthy
{"title":"Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy safe in chronic kidney disease patients!!!","authors":"Pramod Adiga,&nbsp;Sanjay Ramachandra Pudakalkatti,&nbsp;V Shivakumar,&nbsp;Mayank Jain,&nbsp;R Navaneeth Sreenidhi,&nbsp;C S Manohar,&nbsp;Sreenivas Jayaram,&nbsp;M Nagabhushan,&nbsp;Ramaiah Keshavamurthy","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_100_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Management of renal calculus in a patient of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is always challenging. Treatment options include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). With PCNL being gold standard for renal calculus ≥1.5 cm in normal kidneys, we aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of PCNL in CKD patients with calculus ≥1.5 cm.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty patients of CKD with renal calculus were included in the study: Group A with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤30 ml/min/m<sup>2</sup> and Group B with GFR >30 <60 ml/min/m<sup>2</sup>. The estimated GFR (eGFR) pre-PCNL, peak eGFR on follow-up, and eGFR at last follow-up, stone free rates, and complications were recorded. The CKD stage before and after PCNL were also compared at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 52 years. A mean of 1.14sittings per renal unit was required for PCNL. Complete clearance was 94% after all auxiliary procedures. The mean prePCNL eGFR was 26.5 ± 4.01 and 43.6 ± 9l. 14 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> in Groups A and B, respectively. The mean post-PCNL eGFR was 32 ± 9.94 and 51 ± 8.85 ml/minute/1.73 m2, respectively, in Groups A and B. At a mean follow-up of 180 days, deterioration with the migration of CKD stage was seen in 13 patients (21.6%) out of which 10 patients were of Groups A and 3 in Group B. Six patients (10%) required maintenance hemodialysis. Postoperative bleeding complication requiring blood transfusions was seen in 12 (20%) and 3 (5%) required intensive care unit care postoperatively. No mortality was observed in our study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCNL is an effective management strategy for renal calculus in patients with CKD with an acceptable stone clearance rates and manageable complications. Peak eGFR <30 ml/min/m2 and postprocedure complications predict deterioration and need for RRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"14 4","pages":"317-321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6d/b6/UA-14-317.PMC9731184.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_100_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Management of renal calculus in a patient of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is always challenging. Treatment options include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). With PCNL being gold standard for renal calculus ≥1.5 cm in normal kidneys, we aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of PCNL in CKD patients with calculus ≥1.5 cm.

Materials and methods: Sixty patients of CKD with renal calculus were included in the study: Group A with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤30 ml/min/m2 and Group B with GFR >30 <60 ml/min/m2. The estimated GFR (eGFR) pre-PCNL, peak eGFR on follow-up, and eGFR at last follow-up, stone free rates, and complications were recorded. The CKD stage before and after PCNL were also compared at the last follow-up.

Results: The mean age of patients was 52 years. A mean of 1.14sittings per renal unit was required for PCNL. Complete clearance was 94% after all auxiliary procedures. The mean prePCNL eGFR was 26.5 ± 4.01 and 43.6 ± 9l. 14 ml/min/1.73 m2 in Groups A and B, respectively. The mean post-PCNL eGFR was 32 ± 9.94 and 51 ± 8.85 ml/minute/1.73 m2, respectively, in Groups A and B. At a mean follow-up of 180 days, deterioration with the migration of CKD stage was seen in 13 patients (21.6%) out of which 10 patients were of Groups A and 3 in Group B. Six patients (10%) required maintenance hemodialysis. Postoperative bleeding complication requiring blood transfusions was seen in 12 (20%) and 3 (5%) required intensive care unit care postoperatively. No mortality was observed in our study.

Conclusion: PCNL is an effective management strategy for renal calculus in patients with CKD with an acceptable stone clearance rates and manageable complications. Peak eGFR <30 ml/min/m2 and postprocedure complications predict deterioration and need for RRT.

Abstract Image

慢性肾病患者经皮肾镜取石安全吗?
慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者肾结石的处理一直具有挑战性。治疗方案包括体外冲击波碎石术、逆行肾内手术和经皮肾镜取石术。由于PCNL是正常肾脏结石≥1.5 cm的金标准,我们旨在分析PCNL在结石≥1.5 cm的CKD患者中的安全性和有效性。材料与方法:选择60例CKD合并肾结石患者:肾小球滤过率(glomerular filtration rate, GFR)≤30 ml/min/m2的A组和肾小球滤过率>30 ml/min/m2的B组。记录pcnl前估计的eGFR (eGFR)、随访时的eGFR峰值、最后随访时的eGFR、结石无率和并发症。最后一次随访时比较PCNL前后CKD分期。结果:患者平均年龄52岁。PCNL患者平均每个肾单位需要1.14次坐诊。所有辅助手术后完全清除率为94%。prePCNL的平均eGFR分别为26.5±4.01和43.6±91。A、B组分别为14ml /min/1.73 m2。pcnl后,A组和b组的平均eGFR分别为32±9.94和51±8.85 ml/min /1.73 m2。在平均180天的随访中,13例(21.6%)患者出现CKD分期转移恶化,其中A组10例,b组3例,6例(10%)患者需要维持血液透析。术后出血并发症需要输血的有12例(20%),术后需要重症监护的有3例(5%)。在我们的研究中没有观察到死亡率。结论:PCNL是CKD患者肾结石的有效治疗策略,结石清除率可接受,并发症可控。峰表皮生长因子受体
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信