Does Olfactory Training Improve Brain Function and Cognition? A Systematic Review.

IF 5.4 2区 心理学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Review Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-02 DOI:10.1007/s11065-022-09573-0
David E Vance, Victor A Del Bene, Vidyulata Kamath, Jennifer Sandson Frank, Rebecca Billings, Do-Yeon Cho, Jun Y Byun, Alexandra Jacob, Joseph N Anderson, Kristina Visscher, Kristen Triebel, Karli M Martin, Wei Li, Frank Puga, Pariya L Fazeli
{"title":"Does Olfactory Training Improve Brain Function and Cognition? A Systematic Review.","authors":"David E Vance, Victor A Del Bene, Vidyulata Kamath, Jennifer Sandson Frank, Rebecca Billings, Do-Yeon Cho, Jun Y Byun, Alexandra Jacob, Joseph N Anderson, Kristina Visscher, Kristen Triebel, Karli M Martin, Wei Li, Frank Puga, Pariya L Fazeli","doi":"10.1007/s11065-022-09573-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Olfactory training (OT), or smell training,consists of repeated exposure to odorants over time with the intended neuroplastic effect of improving or remediating olfactory functioning. Declines in olfaction parallel declines in cognition in various pathological conditions and aging. Research suggests a dynamic neural connection exists between olfaction and cognition. Thus, if OT can improve olfaction, could OT also improve cognition and support brain function? To answer this question, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine whether there is evidence that OT translates to improved cognition or altered brain morphology and connectivity that supports cognition. Across three databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, & Embase), 18 articles were identified in this systematic review. Overall, the reviewed studies provided emerging evidence that OT is associated with improved global cognition, and in particular, verbal fluency and verbal learning/memory. OT is also associated with increases in the volume/size of olfactory-related brain regions, including the olfactory bulb and hippocampus, and altered functional connectivity. Interestingly, these positive effects were not limited to patients with smell loss (i.e., hyposmia & anosmia) but normosmic (i.e., normal ability to smell) participants benefitted as well. Implications for practice and research are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":49754,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9891899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09573-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Olfactory training (OT), or smell training,consists of repeated exposure to odorants over time with the intended neuroplastic effect of improving or remediating olfactory functioning. Declines in olfaction parallel declines in cognition in various pathological conditions and aging. Research suggests a dynamic neural connection exists between olfaction and cognition. Thus, if OT can improve olfaction, could OT also improve cognition and support brain function? To answer this question, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine whether there is evidence that OT translates to improved cognition or altered brain morphology and connectivity that supports cognition. Across three databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, & Embase), 18 articles were identified in this systematic review. Overall, the reviewed studies provided emerging evidence that OT is associated with improved global cognition, and in particular, verbal fluency and verbal learning/memory. OT is also associated with increases in the volume/size of olfactory-related brain regions, including the olfactory bulb and hippocampus, and altered functional connectivity. Interestingly, these positive effects were not limited to patients with smell loss (i.e., hyposmia & anosmia) but normosmic (i.e., normal ability to smell) participants benefitted as well. Implications for practice and research are provided.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

嗅觉训练能改善大脑功能和认知能力吗?系统回顾。
嗅觉训练(OT)或嗅觉训练包括长期反复接触气味物质,以达到改善或矫正嗅觉功能的神经可塑性效果。在各种病理状况和衰老过程中,嗅觉功能的衰退与认知功能的衰退并行不悖。研究表明,嗅觉和认知之间存在动态的神经联系。因此,如果加时治疗能改善嗅觉,那么加时治疗是否也能改善认知并支持大脑功能?为了回答这个问题,我们对文献进行了系统性的回顾,以确定是否有证据表明加压疗法可以改善认知或改变大脑形态和连接,从而支持认知。通过三个数据库(MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Embase),本次系统性综述共发现了 18 篇文章。总体而言,综述研究提供的新证据表明,加时治疗与整体认知能力的提高有关,尤其是与语言流畅性和语言学习/记忆能力的提高有关。加时训练还与嗅觉相关脑区(包括嗅球和海马)体积/大小的增加以及功能连接的改变有关。有趣的是,这些积极影响不仅限于嗅觉丧失(即嗅觉减退和嗅觉缺失)患者,嗅觉正常(即嗅觉能力正常)的参与者也能从中受益。本文提供了实践和研究方面的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology Review
Neuropsychology Review 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.70%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology Review is a quarterly, refereed publication devoted to integrative review papers on substantive content areas in neuropsychology, with particular focus on populations with endogenous or acquired conditions affecting brain and function and on translational research providing a mechanistic understanding of clinical problems. Publication of new data is not the purview of the journal. Articles are written by international specialists in the field, discussing such complex issues as distinctive functional features of central nervous system disease and injury; challenges in early diagnosis; the impact of genes and environment on function; risk factors for functional impairment; treatment efficacy of neuropsychological rehabilitation; the role of neuroimaging, neuroelectrophysiology, and other neurometric modalities in explicating function; clinical trial design; neuropsychological function and its substrates characteristic of normal development and aging; and neuropsychological dysfunction and its substrates in neurological, psychiatric, and medical conditions. The journal''s broad perspective is supported by an outstanding, multidisciplinary editorial review board guided by the aim to provide students and professionals, clinicians and researchers with scholarly articles that critically and objectively summarize and synthesize the strengths and weaknesses in the literature and propose novel hypotheses, methods of analysis, and links to other fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信