Perioperative immediate hypersensitivity incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes after allergological evaluation: A multi-disciplinary protocol from tertiary hospital, Thailand.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Thanachit Krikeerati, Chamard Wongsa, Torpong Thongngarm, Patcharapong Rujirawan, Nutsakol Borrisut, Pattrapun Wongsripuemtet, Papapit Tuchinda, Yuttana Srinoulprasert, Chanika Subchookul, Chalisa Veerapong, Pattarapa Khunsakdeeyodom, Mongkhon Sompornrattanaphan
{"title":"Perioperative immediate hypersensitivity incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes after allergological evaluation: A multi-disciplinary protocol from tertiary hospital, Thailand.","authors":"Thanachit Krikeerati, Chamard Wongsa, Torpong Thongngarm, Patcharapong Rujirawan, Nutsakol Borrisut, Pattrapun Wongsripuemtet, Papapit Tuchinda, Yuttana Srinoulprasert, Chanika Subchookul, Chalisa Veerapong, Pattarapa Khunsakdeeyodom, Mongkhon Sompornrattanaphan","doi":"10.12932/AP-150922-1456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction (POH) is an immediate hypersensitivity reaction during an anesthesiologist monitored procedure. We report data of clinically-suspected POH (csPOH) patients undergoing an allergist-performed unified diagnostic workup algorithm for POH.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the characteristics of patients with csPOH, POH events, and the POH outcomes of procedures after the unified diagnostic workup algorithm for POH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort was conducted in adult patients with csPOH at Siriraj Hospital, a tertiary hospital, in Thailand from January 2018 to August 2022. Diagnostic workup for POH by the allergist included an initial assessment, followed by comprehensive allergological evaluation. Patients were then follow-up for POH outcomes during subsequent anesthesia procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 68 patients were csPOH, only 52 patients were diagnosed with POH by allergists. The incidence was 1:4,304 anesthetic procedures for POH, and 1:11,900 anesthetic procedures for at least grade III POH. Most patients had a grade III (51.2%) or II (46.4%) reaction. The leading identified causative agents were antibiotics (36.8%), antiseptics (21%), latex (13.1%), and morphine (13.1%). Cefazolin and chlorhexidine were the most common antibiotic and antiseptic, respectively. During a median follow-up time of 2.1 years, all 14 patients completing comprehensive allergological evaluation underwent subsequent anesthesia without recurrence of POH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of POH at our hospital was comparable to the global incidence. Antibiotics were the most common causative agent. Complete records, collaboration among the multidisciplinary team, and comprehensive evaluation of POH allow for safe subsequent procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":8552,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","volume":" ","pages":"539-549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-150922-1456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction (POH) is an immediate hypersensitivity reaction during an anesthesiologist monitored procedure. We report data of clinically-suspected POH (csPOH) patients undergoing an allergist-performed unified diagnostic workup algorithm for POH.

Objective: To describe the characteristics of patients with csPOH, POH events, and the POH outcomes of procedures after the unified diagnostic workup algorithm for POH.

Methods: A prospective cohort was conducted in adult patients with csPOH at Siriraj Hospital, a tertiary hospital, in Thailand from January 2018 to August 2022. Diagnostic workup for POH by the allergist included an initial assessment, followed by comprehensive allergological evaluation. Patients were then follow-up for POH outcomes during subsequent anesthesia procedures.

Results: Of 68 patients were csPOH, only 52 patients were diagnosed with POH by allergists. The incidence was 1:4,304 anesthetic procedures for POH, and 1:11,900 anesthetic procedures for at least grade III POH. Most patients had a grade III (51.2%) or II (46.4%) reaction. The leading identified causative agents were antibiotics (36.8%), antiseptics (21%), latex (13.1%), and morphine (13.1%). Cefazolin and chlorhexidine were the most common antibiotic and antiseptic, respectively. During a median follow-up time of 2.1 years, all 14 patients completing comprehensive allergological evaluation underwent subsequent anesthesia without recurrence of POH.

Conclusions: The incidence of POH at our hospital was comparable to the global incidence. Antibiotics were the most common causative agent. Complete records, collaboration among the multidisciplinary team, and comprehensive evaluation of POH allow for safe subsequent procedures.

围手术期即发过敏症的发生率、临床特征和过敏学评估后的结果:泰国一家三级医院的多学科方案。
背景:围术期即刻超敏反应(POH)是指在麻醉师监控的手术过程中发生的即刻超敏反应。我们报告了临床疑似 POH(csPOH)患者接受过敏专科医生执行的 POH 统一诊断工作算法的数据:描述 csPOH 患者的特征、POH 事件以及采用 POH 统一诊断工作算法后的 POH 治疗结果:方法:2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月,在泰国一家三级医院 Siriraj 医院对 csPOH 成年患者进行了前瞻性队列研究。过敏专科医生对 POH 的诊断工作包括初步评估,然后进行综合过敏评估。然后在随后的麻醉过程中对患者的 POH 结果进行随访:结果:在 68 名 csPOH 患者中,只有 52 名患者被过敏学家诊断为 POH。POH的发生率为1:4,304次麻醉过程,至少为III级POH的发生率为1:11,900次麻醉过程。大多数患者的反应为 III 级(51.2%)或 II 级(46.4%)。已确定的主要致病因子为抗生素(36.8%)、消毒剂(21%)、乳胶(13.1%)和吗啡(13.1%)。头孢唑啉和洗必泰分别是最常见的抗生素和消毒剂。中位随访时间为 2.1 年,所有 14 名完成全面过敏学评估的患者在接受后续麻醉时均未再发生 POH:结论:我院的 POH 发生率与全球发生率相当。抗生素是最常见的致病因素。完整的记录、多学科团队之间的合作以及对 POH 的全面评估可确保后续手术的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology (APJAI) is an online open access journal with the recent impact factor (2018) 1.747 APJAI published 4 times per annum (March, June, September, December). Four issues constitute one volume. APJAI publishes original research articles of basic science, clinical science and reviews on various aspects of allergy and immunology. This journal is an official journal of and published by the Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Association, Thailand. The scopes include mechanism, pathogenesis, host-pathogen interaction, host-environment interaction, allergic diseases, immune-mediated diseases, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, immunotherapy, and vaccine. All papers are published in English and are refereed to international standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书