45 and Up COVID Insights: a dynamic and collaborative approach to evidence-making during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 2.5 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Greer Dawson, Kerrin Bleicher, Sarah Blaynes, Catherine D'Este, Julia Steinberg, Marianne F Weber, Jill Newby, Ding Ding, Bette Liu, Barry Edwards, Andrew Milat, Martin McNamara
{"title":"45 and Up COVID Insights: a dynamic and collaborative approach to evidence-making during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Greer Dawson,&nbsp;Kerrin Bleicher,&nbsp;Sarah Blaynes,&nbsp;Catherine D'Este,&nbsp;Julia Steinberg,&nbsp;Marianne F Weber,&nbsp;Jill Newby,&nbsp;Ding Ding,&nbsp;Bette Liu,&nbsp;Barry Edwards,&nbsp;Andrew Milat,&nbsp;Martin McNamara","doi":"10.17061/phrp32232214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In response to the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a research project was developed with a cohort of 45 and Up Study participants to generate timely, relevant evidence to guide policy, practice and planning. This paper describes the research model, the cohort establishment and characteristics, and some findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A subgroup of 45 and Up Study participants was invited to enrol in 45 and Up COVID Insights -a series of five online surveys conducted during 2020-22. The model involved a close collaborative partnership with the New South Wales Ministry of Health and a panel of scientific advisers, an agile data collection methodology and rapid dissemination of findings. Frequent, iterative engagement with stakeholders provided a framework for identifying survey themes and questions and ensured wide dissemination of findings. Themes included healthcare use, attitudes toward and uptake of COVID-19 prevention measures, and the impact of the pandemic on mental health, loneliness, and lifestyle behaviours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>45 and Up COVID Insights achieved strong stakeholder engagement through extensive consultation and rapid reporting of results. The project recruited a diverse cohort of 32 115 participants: median age 68 years (range: 56-100+); 8% from outer regional/remote areas; 12% from the most socioeconomically disadvantaged communities; and 9% from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. The first four surveys found that the impact of the pandemic varied across populations and stages of the pandemic. Between February-April (survey 2) 2021, 10% reported missed healthcare in the past month because of the pandemic, rising to 26% by September-November 2021 (survey 4). Quality of life remained high (>90% good-excellent across the surveys). As the pandemic progressed, the proportion reporting worsened mental health as a result increased from 29% (July-December 2020, survey 1) to 46% (survey 4). In survey 2 (February-April 2021), 89% intended to get the COVID-19 vaccine, with 8% unsure. By late 2021, vaccination uptake was high, with 98% of respondents having received at least one vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is great value in harnessing a large longitudinal, well-described, and diverse cohort study to generate evidence in a changing context with evolving information needs. The collaborative model enhanced the value and relevance of the data to inform decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp32232214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In response to the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a research project was developed with a cohort of 45 and Up Study participants to generate timely, relevant evidence to guide policy, practice and planning. This paper describes the research model, the cohort establishment and characteristics, and some findings.

Methods: A subgroup of 45 and Up Study participants was invited to enrol in 45 and Up COVID Insights -a series of five online surveys conducted during 2020-22. The model involved a close collaborative partnership with the New South Wales Ministry of Health and a panel of scientific advisers, an agile data collection methodology and rapid dissemination of findings. Frequent, iterative engagement with stakeholders provided a framework for identifying survey themes and questions and ensured wide dissemination of findings. Themes included healthcare use, attitudes toward and uptake of COVID-19 prevention measures, and the impact of the pandemic on mental health, loneliness, and lifestyle behaviours.

Results: 45 and Up COVID Insights achieved strong stakeholder engagement through extensive consultation and rapid reporting of results. The project recruited a diverse cohort of 32 115 participants: median age 68 years (range: 56-100+); 8% from outer regional/remote areas; 12% from the most socioeconomically disadvantaged communities; and 9% from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. The first four surveys found that the impact of the pandemic varied across populations and stages of the pandemic. Between February-April (survey 2) 2021, 10% reported missed healthcare in the past month because of the pandemic, rising to 26% by September-November 2021 (survey 4). Quality of life remained high (>90% good-excellent across the surveys). As the pandemic progressed, the proportion reporting worsened mental health as a result increased from 29% (July-December 2020, survey 1) to 46% (survey 4). In survey 2 (February-April 2021), 89% intended to get the COVID-19 vaccine, with 8% unsure. By late 2021, vaccination uptake was high, with 98% of respondents having received at least one vaccination.

Conclusion: There is great value in harnessing a large longitudinal, well-described, and diverse cohort study to generate evidence in a changing context with evolving information needs. The collaborative model enhanced the value and relevance of the data to inform decisions.

COVID洞察:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的动态和协作取证方法。
为应对2019冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行,我们开展了一项研究项目,纳入了45名及以上的研究参与者,以及时生成相关证据,指导政策、实践和规划。本文介绍了本文的研究模式、研究对象的建立和特点,以及一些研究发现。方法:邀请45名和Up研究参与者组成的亚组参加45和Up COVID洞察- 2020- 2022年期间进行的一系列五项在线调查。该模式涉及与新南威尔士州卫生部和一个科学顾问小组建立密切的合作伙伴关系,采用灵活的数据收集方法和迅速传播调查结果。与利益攸关方的频繁、反复接触为确定调查主题和问题提供了框架,并确保了调查结果的广泛传播。主题包括医疗保健使用、对COVID-19预防措施的态度和采用,以及大流行对心理健康、孤独感和生活方式行为的影响。结果:45及以上COVID Insights通过广泛咨询和快速报告结果,实现了利益相关者的强有力参与。该项目招募了32 115名不同的参与者:中位年龄68岁(范围:56-100+);8%来自外部地区/偏远地区;12%来自社会经济最不利的社区;9%来自文化和语言不同的背景。前四项调查发现,大流行对不同人群和不同阶段的影响各不相同。在2021年2月至4月(调查2)期间,10%的人报告说,由于大流行,他们在过去一个月中错过了医疗保健,到2021年9月至11月,这一比例上升至26%(调查4)。生活质量仍然很高(调查中90%以上的人表现良好)。随着大流行的进展,报告心理健康状况恶化的比例从29%(2020年7月至12月,调查1)增加到46%(调查4)。在调查2(2021年2月至4月)中,89%的人打算接种COVID-19疫苗,8%的人不确定。到2021年底,疫苗接种率很高,98%的答复者至少接种了一次疫苗。结论:在信息需求不断变化的背景下,利用大型纵向、描述良好、多样化的队列研究来产生证据具有很大的价值。协作模型提高了数据的价值和相关性,从而为决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Research & Practice
Public Health Research & Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信