Psychological Processes Associated With Resilience in UK-Based Unpaid Caregivers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Q2 Psychology
Clinical Psychology in Europe Pub Date : 2022-12-22 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI:10.32872/cpe.10313
Emma Wilson, Juliana Onwumere, Colette Hirsch
{"title":"Psychological Processes Associated With Resilience in UK-Based Unpaid Caregivers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Emma Wilson, Juliana Onwumere, Colette Hirsch","doi":"10.32872/cpe.10313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unpaid caregivers have faced and dealt with additional challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the psychological processes associated with their resilience is warranted. The objective of this study was to examine the associations between resilience with mental distress, emotion regulation strategies (i.e., reappraisal and suppression) and interpretation bias in adult caregivers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were living in the UK, aged 18+, and consisted of 182 unpaid caregivers of an adult aged 18+ living with a long-term health condition, and 120 non-caregivers. Data were collected in an online study during the first national UK COVID-19 lockdown (May and September 2020). Hierarchical multiple regression analyses explored whether emotion regulation strategies and interpretation bias explained unique variance in levels of resilience in caregivers whilst controlling for anxiety and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to non-caregivers, caregivers reported higher levels of anxiety, depression, negative interpretation bias and lower levels of resilience. Emotion regulation strategies did not differ between groups. Within caregivers, greater resilience was associated with lower mood disturbance, a positive interpretation bias, and greater use of cognitive reappraisal and lower use of suppression strategies to regulate emotions. Emotion regulation and interpretation bias together predicted an additional 15% of variance in current levels of resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that psychological mechanisms such as emotion regulation strategies, particularly reappraisal, and interpretation bias are associated with resilience in caregivers. Although preliminary, our findings speak to exciting clinical possibilities that could form the target of interventions to improve resilience and lower mental distress in unpaid caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"4 4","pages":"e10313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.10313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unpaid caregivers have faced and dealt with additional challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the psychological processes associated with their resilience is warranted. The objective of this study was to examine the associations between resilience with mental distress, emotion regulation strategies (i.e., reappraisal and suppression) and interpretation bias in adult caregivers.

Method: Participants were living in the UK, aged 18+, and consisted of 182 unpaid caregivers of an adult aged 18+ living with a long-term health condition, and 120 non-caregivers. Data were collected in an online study during the first national UK COVID-19 lockdown (May and September 2020). Hierarchical multiple regression analyses explored whether emotion regulation strategies and interpretation bias explained unique variance in levels of resilience in caregivers whilst controlling for anxiety and depression.

Results: Compared to non-caregivers, caregivers reported higher levels of anxiety, depression, negative interpretation bias and lower levels of resilience. Emotion regulation strategies did not differ between groups. Within caregivers, greater resilience was associated with lower mood disturbance, a positive interpretation bias, and greater use of cognitive reappraisal and lower use of suppression strategies to regulate emotions. Emotion regulation and interpretation bias together predicted an additional 15% of variance in current levels of resilience.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that psychological mechanisms such as emotion regulation strategies, particularly reappraisal, and interpretation bias are associated with resilience in caregivers. Although preliminary, our findings speak to exciting clinical possibilities that could form the target of interventions to improve resilience and lower mental distress in unpaid caregivers.

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,与英国无偿照护者复原力相关的心理过程。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,无酬照护者面临并应对着额外的挑战。有必要了解与他们的复原力相关的心理过程。本研究旨在探讨成年照顾者的复原力与精神痛苦、情绪调节策略(即重新评估和抑制)和解释偏差之间的关联:参与者居住在英国,年龄在 18 岁以上,包括 182 名 18 岁以上患有长期疾病的成人的无偿照顾者和 120 名非照顾者。数据是在英国 COVID-19 第一次全国性封锁期间(2020 年 5 月和 9 月)通过在线研究收集的。分层多元回归分析探讨了情绪调节策略和解释偏差是否可以解释护理人员复原力水平的独特差异,同时控制焦虑和抑郁:与非照顾者相比,照顾者报告的焦虑、抑郁、负面解释偏差水平更高,复原力水平更低。不同群体的情绪调节策略并无差异。在照顾者中,较高的复原力与较低的情绪障碍、积极的解释偏差、更多地使用认知再评价和较少使用抑制策略来调节情绪有关。情绪调节和解释偏差共同预测了当前复原力水平额外15%的差异:我们的研究结果表明,情绪调节策略(尤其是重新评估)和解释偏差等心理机制与护理人员的复原力有关。尽管是初步研究,但我们的发现为临床提供了令人兴奋的可能性,这些可能性可以成为干预措施的目标,以提高无酬照顾者的复原力并降低其精神痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Clinical Psychology in Europe Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信