A Mental Wealth perspective: crossing disciplines to understand the value of collective mental and social assets in the post-COVID-19 era.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Kristen Tran, John Buchanan, Yun Ju Christine Song, Sebastian Rosenberg, Jo-An Occhipinti, Ian B Hickie
{"title":"A Mental Wealth perspective: crossing disciplines to understand the value of collective mental and social assets in the post-COVID-19 era.","authors":"Kristen Tran,&nbsp;John Buchanan,&nbsp;Yun Ju Christine Song,&nbsp;Sebastian Rosenberg,&nbsp;Jo-An Occhipinti,&nbsp;Ian B Hickie","doi":"10.1186/s13033-022-00568-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A reconceptualised global strategy is key as nations begin to shift from crisis management to medium- and long-term planning to rebuild and strengthen their economic, social and public health systems. Efforts towards measuring, modelling, and forecasting Mental Wealth could serve as the catalyst for this reconceptualization. The Mental Wealth approach builds systemic resilience through investments which promote collective cognitive and emotional wellbeing. This paper presents the theoretical foundations for Mental Wealth. It presents, for the first time, literature across the disciplines of health and social sciences, economics, business, and humanities to underpin the development of an operational metric of Mental Wealth.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>An approach which embeds social and psychological dimensions of prosperity, alongside the economic, is needed to inform the effective allocation of investments in the post-pandemic world. The authors advocate for a transdisciplinary framework of Mental Wealth to be applied in innovating population-level policy interventions to address the growing challenges brought on by COVID-19. Mental Wealth highlights the value generated by the deployment of collective mental assets and supporting social infrastructure. In order to inform this position, a review of the literature on the concepts underpinning Mental Wealth is presented, limitations of current measurement tools of mental and social resources are evaluated, and a framework for development of a Mental Wealth metric is proposed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are challenges in developing an operational Mental Wealth metric. The breadth of conceptual foundations to be considered is extensive, and there may be a lack of agreement on the appropriate tools for its measurement. While variability across current measurement approaches in social resources, wellbeing and mental assets contributes to the difficulty creating a holistic and generic metric, these variations are now clearer. The operationalisation of the Mental Wealth metric will require comprehensive mapping of the elements to be included against the data available.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":"16 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742032/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-022-00568-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: A reconceptualised global strategy is key as nations begin to shift from crisis management to medium- and long-term planning to rebuild and strengthen their economic, social and public health systems. Efforts towards measuring, modelling, and forecasting Mental Wealth could serve as the catalyst for this reconceptualization. The Mental Wealth approach builds systemic resilience through investments which promote collective cognitive and emotional wellbeing. This paper presents the theoretical foundations for Mental Wealth. It presents, for the first time, literature across the disciplines of health and social sciences, economics, business, and humanities to underpin the development of an operational metric of Mental Wealth.

Discussion: An approach which embeds social and psychological dimensions of prosperity, alongside the economic, is needed to inform the effective allocation of investments in the post-pandemic world. The authors advocate for a transdisciplinary framework of Mental Wealth to be applied in innovating population-level policy interventions to address the growing challenges brought on by COVID-19. Mental Wealth highlights the value generated by the deployment of collective mental assets and supporting social infrastructure. In order to inform this position, a review of the literature on the concepts underpinning Mental Wealth is presented, limitations of current measurement tools of mental and social resources are evaluated, and a framework for development of a Mental Wealth metric is proposed.

Conclusion: There are challenges in developing an operational Mental Wealth metric. The breadth of conceptual foundations to be considered is extensive, and there may be a lack of agreement on the appropriate tools for its measurement. While variability across current measurement approaches in social resources, wellbeing and mental assets contributes to the difficulty creating a holistic and generic metric, these variations are now clearer. The operationalisation of the Mental Wealth metric will require comprehensive mapping of the elements to be included against the data available.

精神财富视角:跨学科理解后新冠时代集体精神资产和社会资产的价值
背景:随着各国开始从危机管理转向中期和长期规划,以重建和加强其经济、社会和公共卫生系统,重新定义全球战略是关键。测量、建模和预测精神财富的努力可以作为这种重新概念化的催化剂。“精神财富”方法通过促进集体认知和情感健康的投资,建立了系统性的弹性。本文介绍了心理财富的理论基础。它首次介绍了卫生和社会科学、经济学、商学和人文学科的文献,以支持精神财富可操作指标的发展。讨论:需要采取一种将繁荣的社会和心理层面与经济层面结合起来的办法,以便为大流行后世界的有效投资分配提供信息。作者主张建立一个跨学科的精神财富框架,用于创新人口层面的政策干预措施,以应对COVID-19带来的日益严峻的挑战。精神财富强调集体精神资产和支持性社会基础设施的部署所产生的价值。为了阐明这一观点,本文回顾了支撑心理财富概念的文献,评估了当前心理和社会资源测量工具的局限性,并提出了一个开发心理财富指标的框架。结论:开发可操作的心理财富指标存在挑战。要考虑的概念基础的广度是广泛的,并且可能对其测量的适当工具缺乏一致意见。虽然目前社会资源、福祉和精神资产的测量方法存在差异,导致难以创建一个整体和通用的衡量标准,但这些差异现在变得更加清晰。精神财富指标的实施将需要根据现有数据对要纳入的要素进行全面映射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信