Pathways to Health Reported by Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder With a Good Overall Outcome Versus a Fair-Poor Outcome Over 24 Years of Prospective Follow-Up.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Mary C Zanarini, Katherine E Hein, Christina M Temes, Frances R Frankenburg, Garrett M Fitzmaurice
{"title":"Pathways to Health Reported by Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder With a Good Overall Outcome Versus a Fair-Poor Outcome Over 24 Years of Prospective Follow-Up.","authors":"Mary C Zanarini,&nbsp;Katherine E Hein,&nbsp;Christina M Temes,&nbsp;Frances R Frankenburg,&nbsp;Garrett M Fitzmaurice","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2023.37.4.456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our objective was to determine pathways to health reported by patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) who had and had not attained a good overall outcome over 24 years of prospective follow-up. Overall outcome symptomatically and psychosocially and 11 pathways to health related to vocation, relationships, activities, and psychiatric treatment that patients reported were helpful to their functioning or feeling better about themselves were assessed at 12 contiguous 2-year follow-up periods using a semistructured interview. Good outcome patients reported significantly higher rates of pathways related to work performance, relationships with friends, relationship with a partner/spouse, and athletic activities. In contrast, patients with a fair-poor outcome reported significantly higher rates of psychotherapy and psychotropic medication as pathways. Taken together, the results of this study suggest that a good overall outcome is significantly associated with reported vocational, interpersonal, and activity pathways, while a fair-poor outcome is significantly associated with reported treatment-related pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"37 4","pages":"456-468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2023.37.4.456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our objective was to determine pathways to health reported by patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) who had and had not attained a good overall outcome over 24 years of prospective follow-up. Overall outcome symptomatically and psychosocially and 11 pathways to health related to vocation, relationships, activities, and psychiatric treatment that patients reported were helpful to their functioning or feeling better about themselves were assessed at 12 contiguous 2-year follow-up periods using a semistructured interview. Good outcome patients reported significantly higher rates of pathways related to work performance, relationships with friends, relationship with a partner/spouse, and athletic activities. In contrast, patients with a fair-poor outcome reported significantly higher rates of psychotherapy and psychotropic medication as pathways. Taken together, the results of this study suggest that a good overall outcome is significantly associated with reported vocational, interpersonal, and activity pathways, while a fair-poor outcome is significantly associated with reported treatment-related pathways.

在24年的前瞻性随访中,边缘型人格障碍患者报告的总体结果良好与较差的健康途径。
我们的目的是确定边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者报告的健康途径,这些患者在24年的前瞻性随访中取得和未取得良好的总体结果。在12个连续的2年随访期内,使用半结构化访谈评估了症状和心理社会的总体结果,以及患者报告的与职业、关系、活动和精神治疗相关的11条健康途径,这些途径有助于他们的功能或自我感觉更好。结果良好的患者报告说,与工作表现、与朋友的关系、与伴侣/配偶的关系以及体育活动相关的途径发生率显著较高。相比之下,结果相当差的患者报告称,作为途径的心理治疗和精神药物治疗率明显更高。总之,这项研究的结果表明,良好的总体结果与所报告的职业、人际和活动途径显著相关,而较差的结果与所报道的治疗相关途径显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Disorders has long been the only forum devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant personality disorders. The journal fosters dialogue among researchers and practitioners working from a variety of orientations and approaches. Its international impact is well established, with subscribers in over 30 countries. This multidisciplinary journal regularly features: - Research on normal and pathological personality and development - New methodologies for assessing personality - Etiologies and clinical classifications for personality disorders - Epidemiological studies and outcomes research on diagnostic criteria - Treatment techniques and innovations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信