A Prospective Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Iatrogenic Urethral Catheterization Injuries.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Stefanie M Croghan, Leah Hayes, Eabhann M O'Connor, Mark Rochester, William Finch, Anne Carrie, Shane W Considine, Frank D'Arcy, Aisling Nic An Riogh, Wasim Mahmalji, Mohammed Elhadi, Helen Thursby, Ian Pearce, Vaibhav Modgil, Hosam Noweir, Eoin MacCraith, Aideen Madden, Rustom Manecksha, Eva Browne, Subhasis K Giri, Connor V Cunnane, John Mulvihill, Michael T Walsh, Niall F Davis, Hugh D Flood
{"title":"A Prospective Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Iatrogenic Urethral Catheterization Injuries.","authors":"Stefanie M Croghan,&nbsp;Leah Hayes,&nbsp;Eabhann M O'Connor,&nbsp;Mark Rochester,&nbsp;William Finch,&nbsp;Anne Carrie,&nbsp;Shane W Considine,&nbsp;Frank D'Arcy,&nbsp;Aisling Nic An Riogh,&nbsp;Wasim Mahmalji,&nbsp;Mohammed Elhadi,&nbsp;Helen Thursby,&nbsp;Ian Pearce,&nbsp;Vaibhav Modgil,&nbsp;Hosam Noweir,&nbsp;Eoin MacCraith,&nbsp;Aideen Madden,&nbsp;Rustom Manecksha,&nbsp;Eva Browne,&nbsp;Subhasis K Giri,&nbsp;Connor V Cunnane,&nbsp;John Mulvihill,&nbsp;Michael T Walsh,&nbsp;Niall F Davis,&nbsp;Hugh D Flood","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2022.2109226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To perform a multi-institutional investigation of incidence and outcomes of urethral trauma sustained during attempted catheterization.</p><p><strong>Patients & methods: </strong>A prospective, multi-center study was conducted over a designated 3-4 month period, incorporating seven academic hospitals across the UK and Ireland. Cases of urethral trauma arising from attempted catheterization were recorded. Variables included sites of injury, management strategies and short-term clinical outcomes. The catheterization injury rate was calculated based on the estimated total number of catheterizations occurring in each center per month. Anonymised data were collated, evaluated and described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six urethral catheterization injuries were identified (7 centers; mean 3.43 months). The mean injury rate was 6.2 ± 3.8 per 1000 catheterizations (3.18-14.42/1000). All injured patients were male, mean age 76.1 ± 13.1 years. Urethral catheterization injuries occurred in multiple hospital/community settings, most commonly Emergency Departments (36%) and medical/surgical wards (30%). Urological intervention was required in 94.7% (54/57), with suprapubic catheterization required in 12.3% (n = 7). More than half of patients (55.56%) were discharged with an urethral catheter, fully or partially attributable to the urethral catheter injury. At least one further healthcare encounter on account of the injury was required for 90% of patients post-discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the largest study of its kind and confirms that iatrogenic urethral trauma is a recurring medical error seen universally across institutions, healthcare systems and countries. In addition, urethral catheter injury results in significant patient morbidity with a substantial financial burden to healthcare services. Future innovation to improve the safety of urinary catheterization is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":"35 10","pages":"1761-1766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2022.2109226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: To perform a multi-institutional investigation of incidence and outcomes of urethral trauma sustained during attempted catheterization.

Patients & methods: A prospective, multi-center study was conducted over a designated 3-4 month period, incorporating seven academic hospitals across the UK and Ireland. Cases of urethral trauma arising from attempted catheterization were recorded. Variables included sites of injury, management strategies and short-term clinical outcomes. The catheterization injury rate was calculated based on the estimated total number of catheterizations occurring in each center per month. Anonymised data were collated, evaluated and described.

Results: Sixty-six urethral catheterization injuries were identified (7 centers; mean 3.43 months). The mean injury rate was 6.2 ± 3.8 per 1000 catheterizations (3.18-14.42/1000). All injured patients were male, mean age 76.1 ± 13.1 years. Urethral catheterization injuries occurred in multiple hospital/community settings, most commonly Emergency Departments (36%) and medical/surgical wards (30%). Urological intervention was required in 94.7% (54/57), with suprapubic catheterization required in 12.3% (n = 7). More than half of patients (55.56%) were discharged with an urethral catheter, fully or partially attributable to the urethral catheter injury. At least one further healthcare encounter on account of the injury was required for 90% of patients post-discharge.

Conclusions: This is the largest study of its kind and confirms that iatrogenic urethral trauma is a recurring medical error seen universally across institutions, healthcare systems and countries. In addition, urethral catheter injury results in significant patient morbidity with a substantial financial burden to healthcare services. Future innovation to improve the safety of urinary catheterization is warranted.

医源性导尿损伤的前瞻性多机构评估。
目的:对导尿过程中尿道创伤的发生率和结果进行多机构调查。患者和方法:一项前瞻性多中心研究在指定的3-4个月期间进行,纳入了英国和爱尔兰的七家学术医院。我们记录了因尝试导尿引起尿道创伤的病例。变量包括损伤部位、治疗策略和短期临床结果。导管损伤率是根据每个中心每月发生的导管估计总数来计算的。对匿名数据进行整理、评估和描述。结果:共发现尿置管损伤66例(7个中心;平均3.43个月)。平均损伤率为6.2±3.8 /1000(3.18 ~ 14.42/1000)。所有患者均为男性,平均年龄76.1±13.1岁。导尿损伤发生在多个医院/社区环境中,最常见的是急诊科(36%)和内科/外科病房(30%)。94.7%(54/57)患者需要泌尿外科干预,12.3% (n = 7)患者需要耻骨上导尿。超过一半(55.56%)的患者出院时留置导尿管,全部或部分原因是导尿管损伤。90%的患者出院后至少需要一次进一步的医疗护理。结论:这是同类研究中规模最大的一项研究,证实了医源性尿道创伤是一种反复出现的医疗错误,在各个机构、医疗系统和国家都普遍存在。此外,尿道导管损伤会导致严重的患者发病率,给医疗保健服务带来巨大的经济负担。未来的创新,以提高尿导尿的安全性是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信