Should Health Systems Share Genetic Findings With At-Risk Relatives When the Proband Is Deceased? Interviews With Individuals Diagnosed With Lynch Syndrome.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jessica Ezzell Hunter, Jennifer L Schneider, Alison J Firemark, James V Davis, Sara Gille, Pamala A Pawloski, Su-Ying Liang, Victoria Schlieder, Alanna Kulchak Rahm
{"title":"Should Health Systems Share Genetic Findings With At-Risk Relatives When the Proband Is Deceased? Interviews With Individuals Diagnosed With Lynch Syndrome.","authors":"Jessica Ezzell Hunter,&nbsp;Jennifer L Schneider,&nbsp;Alison J Firemark,&nbsp;James V Davis,&nbsp;Sara Gille,&nbsp;Pamala A Pawloski,&nbsp;Su-Ying Liang,&nbsp;Victoria Schlieder,&nbsp;Alanna Kulchak Rahm","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Genetic information has health implications for patients and their biological relatives. Death of a patient before sharing a genetic diagnosis with at-risk relatives is a missed opportunity to provide important information that could guide interventions to minimize cancer-related morbidity and mortality in relatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed semi-structured interviews with individuals diagnosed with Lynch syndrome at 1 of 4 health systems to explore their perspectives on whether health systems should share genetic risk information with relatives following a patient's death. An inductive, open-coding approach was used to analyze audio-recorded content, with software-generated code reports undergoing iterative comparative analysis by a qualitative research team to identify broad themes and representative participant quotes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 23 participating interviewees, 19 supported health systems informing relatives about their Lynch syndrome risk while the remaining 4 were conflicted about patient privacy. Most (n=22) wanted their Lynch syndrome diagnosis shared with relatives if they were unable to share and to be informed of their own risk if a diagnosed relative was unable to share. The most common issues noted regarding information-sharing with relatives included patient privacy and privacy laws (n=8), potential anxiety (n=5), and lack of contact information for relatives (n=3). Interviewee perspectives on how health systems could communicate genetic findings generated a consensus: When - a few months after but within a year of the patient's death; How - explanatory letter and follow-up phone call; and Who - a knowledgeable professional.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interviews demonstrated strong and consistent perspectives from individuals diagnosed with Lynch syndrome that health systems have a role and responsibility to inform relatives of genetic findings following a patient's death.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584081/pdf/jpcrr-9.4.282.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Genetic information has health implications for patients and their biological relatives. Death of a patient before sharing a genetic diagnosis with at-risk relatives is a missed opportunity to provide important information that could guide interventions to minimize cancer-related morbidity and mortality in relatives.

Methods: We performed semi-structured interviews with individuals diagnosed with Lynch syndrome at 1 of 4 health systems to explore their perspectives on whether health systems should share genetic risk information with relatives following a patient's death. An inductive, open-coding approach was used to analyze audio-recorded content, with software-generated code reports undergoing iterative comparative analysis by a qualitative research team to identify broad themes and representative participant quotes.

Results: Among 23 participating interviewees, 19 supported health systems informing relatives about their Lynch syndrome risk while the remaining 4 were conflicted about patient privacy. Most (n=22) wanted their Lynch syndrome diagnosis shared with relatives if they were unable to share and to be informed of their own risk if a diagnosed relative was unable to share. The most common issues noted regarding information-sharing with relatives included patient privacy and privacy laws (n=8), potential anxiety (n=5), and lack of contact information for relatives (n=3). Interviewee perspectives on how health systems could communicate genetic findings generated a consensus: When - a few months after but within a year of the patient's death; How - explanatory letter and follow-up phone call; and Who - a knowledgeable professional.

Conclusions: Interviews demonstrated strong and consistent perspectives from individuals diagnosed with Lynch syndrome that health systems have a role and responsibility to inform relatives of genetic findings following a patient's death.

当先证者去世时,卫生系统是否应该与有风险的亲属分享遗传发现?与被诊断患有林奇综合症的个体的访谈。
目的:遗传信息对患者及其生物学亲属具有健康意义。患者在与有风险的亲属分享基因诊断之前死亡,错失了提供重要信息的机会,这些信息可以指导干预措施,以尽量减少亲属中癌症相关的发病率和死亡率。方法:我们对4个卫生系统中1个被诊断为Lynch综合征的个体进行了半结构化访谈,以探讨他们对卫生系统是否应该在患者死亡后与亲属分享遗传风险信息的看法。采用归纳、开放编码的方法来分析音频记录的内容,软件生成的代码报告由定性研究团队进行迭代比较分析,以确定广泛的主题和代表性的参与者引用。结果:在23名参与受访者中,19人支持卫生系统告知亲属他们的Lynch综合征风险,而其余4人在患者隐私方面存在冲突。大多数人(n=22)希望他们的Lynch综合征诊断与亲人分享,如果他们无法分享,如果确诊的亲属无法分享,他们希望被告知自己的风险。在与亲属分享信息方面,最常见的问题包括患者隐私和隐私法(n=8)、潜在焦虑(n=5)和缺乏亲属联系信息(n=3)。受访者对卫生系统如何传播遗传发现的看法形成了共识:何时——在患者死亡后几个月或一年内;如何-解释信和跟进电话;和Who——知识渊博的专业人士。结论:访谈显示来自Lynch综合征确诊患者的强烈和一致的观点,即卫生系统有作用和责任在患者死亡后将遗传发现告知亲属。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信