Technical quality assurance and quality control for medical laboratories: a review and proposal of a new concept to obtain integrated and validated QA/QC plans.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Huub H van Rossum
{"title":"Technical quality assurance and quality control for medical laboratories: a review and proposal of a new concept to obtain integrated and validated QA/QC plans.","authors":"Huub H van Rossum","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2022.2088685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Technical quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QA/QC) are important activities within medical laboratories to ensure the adequate quality of obtained test results. QA/QC tools available at medical laboratories include external QC and internal QC, patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) tools such as moving average quality control (MAQC), limit checks, delta checks, and multivariate checks, and finally, analyzer flagging. Recently, for PBRTQC tools, new optimization and validation methods based on error detection simulation have been developed to obtain laboratory-specific insights into PBRTQC error detection. These developments have enabled implementation and application of these individual tools in routine clinical practice. As a next step, they also enable performance comparison of the individual QA/QC tools and integration of all the individual QA/QC tools in order to obtain the most powerful and efficient QA/QC plans. In this review, a brief overview of the individual QA/QC tools and their characteristics is provided and the error detection simulation approaches are explained. Finally, a new concept entitled integrated quality assurance and control (IQAC) is presented. To enable IQAC, a conceptual framework is suggested and demonstrated for sodium, based on available published data. The proposed IQAC framework provides ways and tools by which the performance of different QA/QC tools can be compared in a so-called QA/QC error detection table to enable optimization and validation of the overall QA/QC plan in terms of alarm rate as well as pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical error detection performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":"59 8","pages":"586-600"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2022.2088685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Technical quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QA/QC) are important activities within medical laboratories to ensure the adequate quality of obtained test results. QA/QC tools available at medical laboratories include external QC and internal QC, patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) tools such as moving average quality control (MAQC), limit checks, delta checks, and multivariate checks, and finally, analyzer flagging. Recently, for PBRTQC tools, new optimization and validation methods based on error detection simulation have been developed to obtain laboratory-specific insights into PBRTQC error detection. These developments have enabled implementation and application of these individual tools in routine clinical practice. As a next step, they also enable performance comparison of the individual QA/QC tools and integration of all the individual QA/QC tools in order to obtain the most powerful and efficient QA/QC plans. In this review, a brief overview of the individual QA/QC tools and their characteristics is provided and the error detection simulation approaches are explained. Finally, a new concept entitled integrated quality assurance and control (IQAC) is presented. To enable IQAC, a conceptual framework is suggested and demonstrated for sodium, based on available published data. The proposed IQAC framework provides ways and tools by which the performance of different QA/QC tools can be compared in a so-called QA/QC error detection table to enable optimization and validation of the overall QA/QC plan in terms of alarm rate as well as pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical error detection performance.

医学实验室的技术质量保证和质量控制:一个新概念的审查和建议,以获得完整和有效的QA/QC计划。
技术质量保证(QA)和质量控制(QA/QC)是医学实验室确保获得的检测结果具有足够质量的重要活动。医学实验室可用的QA/QC工具包括外部QC和内部QC、基于患者的实时质量控制(PBRTQC)工具,如移动平均质量控制(MAQC)、极限检查、增量检查和多变量检查,最后是分析仪标记。最近,针对PBRTQC工具,开发了基于错误检测仿真的新的优化和验证方法,以获得实验室特定的PBRTQC错误检测。这些发展使这些单独的工具在常规临床实践中得以实施和应用。下一步,它们还可以对单个QA/QC工具进行性能比较,并集成所有单个QA/QC工具,以获得最强大和最有效的QA/QC计划。在这篇综述中,简要概述了各个QA/QC工具及其特性,并解释了错误检测模拟方法。最后,提出了综合质量保证与控制(IQAC)的概念。为了实现IQAC,根据现有的已发表数据,提出并演示了钠的概念框架。提出的IQAC框架提供了各种方法和工具,通过这些方法和工具,可以在所谓的QA/QC错误检测表中比较不同QA/QC工具的性能,从而在报警率以及分析前、分析中和分析后错误检测性能方面优化和验证整个QA/QC计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信