Biometric Assessment of Temporomandibular Disorders in Orthodontics: A Multi-arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Raj Kumar Maurya, Harpreet Singh, Brijinder Talwar, Poonam Sharma, Pranav Kapoor
{"title":"Biometric Assessment of Temporomandibular Disorders in Orthodontics: A Multi-arm Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Raj Kumar Maurya,&nbsp;Harpreet Singh,&nbsp;Brijinder Talwar,&nbsp;Poonam Sharma,&nbsp;Pranav Kapoor","doi":"10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the role of fixed orthodontic treatment in the aggravation, precipitation, or alleviation of temporomandibular disorders in young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients were randomly assigned to 4 groups of 15 patients each (group I, orthodontic treatment in temporomandibular disorder-free orthodontic patients; group II, orthodontic treatment in patients with mild symptoms of temporomandibular disorders; group III, splint therapy accompanied by orthodontic treatment in patients with moderate symptoms; and group IV, control with no treatment). The biometric equipment used were the T-scan, to analyze the occlusal component; the BioEMG for muscular analysis; BioJVA for temporomandibular joint acoustic analysis; and JT3D for mandibular kinematic analysis. The paired t-test and ANOVA were used for intragroup and intergroup comparisons, respectively. The difference between groups was assessed using post hoc Tukey's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups I and III showed significant difference in the occlusal, muscular, temporomandibular joint vibration, and kinematic mandibular assessment variables. Group II showed significant improvement in occlusal variables only. Group IV did not show improvement in any of the variables except for certain muscular components.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Successful practical utilization of biometric equipment revealed that fixed orthodontic treatment does not aggravate temporomandibular disorders. It was also found that temporomandibular disorders due to malocclusion can be treated successfully with orthodontic treatment, whereas temporomandibular disorders due to multifactorial temporomandibular joint and muscular components might require splint therapy before orthodontic intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":37013,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"35 4","pages":"290-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885786/pdf/tjo-35-4-290.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the role of fixed orthodontic treatment in the aggravation, precipitation, or alleviation of temporomandibular disorders in young adults.

Methods: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to 4 groups of 15 patients each (group I, orthodontic treatment in temporomandibular disorder-free orthodontic patients; group II, orthodontic treatment in patients with mild symptoms of temporomandibular disorders; group III, splint therapy accompanied by orthodontic treatment in patients with moderate symptoms; and group IV, control with no treatment). The biometric equipment used were the T-scan, to analyze the occlusal component; the BioEMG for muscular analysis; BioJVA for temporomandibular joint acoustic analysis; and JT3D for mandibular kinematic analysis. The paired t-test and ANOVA were used for intragroup and intergroup comparisons, respectively. The difference between groups was assessed using post hoc Tukey's test.

Results: Groups I and III showed significant difference in the occlusal, muscular, temporomandibular joint vibration, and kinematic mandibular assessment variables. Group II showed significant improvement in occlusal variables only. Group IV did not show improvement in any of the variables except for certain muscular components.

Conclusion: Successful practical utilization of biometric equipment revealed that fixed orthodontic treatment does not aggravate temporomandibular disorders. It was also found that temporomandibular disorders due to malocclusion can be treated successfully with orthodontic treatment, whereas temporomandibular disorders due to multifactorial temporomandibular joint and muscular components might require splint therapy before orthodontic intervention.

正畸患者颞下颌紊乱的生物计量评估:一项多组随机对照试验。
目的:本随机对照试验旨在评估固定正畸治疗在年轻人颞下颌疾病加重、沉淀或缓解中的作用。方法:60例患者随机分为4组,每组15例患者(第一组,正畸治疗无颞下颌疾患的正畸患者;II组,轻度颞下颌紊乱患者的正畸治疗;III组,中度症状患者夹板治疗同时进行正畸治疗;IV组为未治疗的对照组)。使用的生物识别设备是t扫描,用于分析咬合成分;用于肌肉分析的生物肌电图;BioJVA用于颞下颌关节声学分析JT3D用于下颌运动分析。组内比较采用配对t检验,组间比较采用方差分析。采用事后Tukey’s检验评估组间差异。结果:I组和III组在咬合、肌肉、颞下颌关节振动和下颌运动评估变量上有显著差异。第二组仅在咬合变量上有显著改善。除了某些肌肉成分外,第四组在任何变量上都没有表现出改善。结论:生物识别设备的成功应用表明固定正畸治疗不会加重颞下颌疾病。我们还发现,由错牙合引起的颞下颌疾病可以通过正畸治疗成功治疗,而由多因素颞下颌关节和肌肉成分引起的颞下颌疾病可能需要在正畸干预前进行夹板治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信