Assessment of Strengths in Criminal Justice System-Impacted Youth: A Retrospective Validation Study of the SAPROF-YV.

IF 2.1 3区心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Criminal Justice and Behavior Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1177/00938548231165286

Sonia Finseth, Michele Peterson-Badali, Shelley L Brown, Tracey A Skilling

{"title":"Assessment of Strengths in Criminal Justice System-Impacted Youth: A Retrospective Validation Study of the SAPROF-YV.","authors":"Sonia Finseth, Michele Peterson-Badali, Shelley L Brown, Tracey A Skilling","doi":"10.1177/00938548231165286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk-Youth Version (SAPROF-YV; de Vries Robbé et al., 2015) was designed specifically to assess strengths as a complement to risk assessment tools. We retrospectively examined its reliability and validity in 305 Canadian community-sentenced youth, both in the overall sample and in male and female, and Black and White, subgroups. In all groups, the total score had strong internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and convergent validity, and significantly predicted general recidivism at 3-year fixed follow-up. The SAPROF-YV showed incremental validity over the YLS/CMI only in Black youth. In the total sample, a moderation effect was identified whereby strengths were protective at lower levels of risk but not for moderate or high risk youth. The SAPROF-YV shows promising reliability and validity; however, more research is needed before clear guidance can be provided regarding the use of this measure in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48287,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","volume":"50 7","pages":"953-975"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b2/b2/10.1177_00938548231165286.PMC10265291.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231165286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk-Youth Version (SAPROF-YV; de Vries Robbé et al., 2015) was designed specifically to assess strengths as a complement to risk assessment tools. We retrospectively examined its reliability and validity in 305 Canadian community-sentenced youth, both in the overall sample and in male and female, and Black and White, subgroups. In all groups, the total score had strong internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and convergent validity, and significantly predicted general recidivism at 3-year fixed follow-up. The SAPROF-YV showed incremental validity over the YLS/CMI only in Black youth. In the total sample, a moderation effect was identified whereby strengths were protective at lower levels of risk but not for moderate or high risk youth. The SAPROF-YV shows promising reliability and validity; however, more research is needed before clear guidance can be provided regarding the use of this measure in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

刑事司法系统影响青少年的优势评估:saprofi - yv的回顾性验证研究。

暴力风险保护因素结构化评估青少年版(saprofi - yv)de Vries rob等人，2015)是专门为评估优势而设计的，作为风险评估工具的补充。我们回顾性地检验了305名加拿大社区服刑青年的信度和效度，包括总体样本、男性和女性、黑人和白人亚组。各组总分具有较强的内部一致性、量表间信度和收敛效度，并在3年固定随访中显著预测一般再犯。saprofo - yv仅在黑人青年中比YLS/CMI具有递增的效度。在整个样本中，确定了适度效应，即优势在较低风险水平上具有保护作用，但对中等或高风险青年则没有保护作用。saprofo - yv具有良好的信度和效度;然而，在提供关于在临床实践中使用这一措施的明确指导之前，还需要进行更多的研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Criminal Justice and Behavior Multiple-

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

4.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Criminal Justice and Behavior publishes articles examining psychological and behavioral aspects of the juvenile and criminal justice systems. The concepts "criminal justice" and "behavior" should be interpreted broadly to include analyses of etiology of delinquent or criminal behavior, the process of law violation, victimology, offender classification and treatment, deterrence, and incapacitation.