Mathematical modeling of risk-taking in bipolar disorder: Evidence of reduced behavioral consistency, with altered loss aversion specific to those with history of substance use disorder.

Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-24 DOI:10.5334/cpsy.61
Carly A Lasagna, Timothy J Pleskac, Cynthia Z Burton, Melvin G McInnis, Stephan F Taylor, Ivy F Tso
{"title":"Mathematical modeling of risk-taking in bipolar disorder: Evidence of reduced behavioral consistency, with altered loss aversion specific to those with history of substance use disorder.","authors":"Carly A Lasagna, Timothy J Pleskac, Cynthia Z Burton, Melvin G McInnis, Stephan F Taylor, Ivy F Tso","doi":"10.5334/cpsy.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with excessive pleasure-seeking risk-taking behaviors that often characterize its clinical presentation. However, the mechanisms of risk-taking behavior are not well-understood in BD. Recent data suggest prior substance use disorder (SUD) in BD may represent certain trait-level vulnerabilities for risky behavior. This study examined the mechanisms of risk-taking and the role of SUD in BD via mathematical modeling of behavior on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Three groups-18 euthymic BD with prior SUD (BD+), 15 euthymic BD without prior SUD (BD-), and 33 healthy comparisons (HC)-completed the BART. We modeled behavior using 4 competing hierarchical Bayesian models, and model comparison results favored the Exponential-Weight Mean-Variance (EWMV) model, which encompasses and delineates five cognitive components of risk-taking: prior belief, learning rate, risk preference, loss aversion, and behavioral consistency. Both BD groups, regardless of SUD history, showed lower behavioral consistency than HC. BD+ exhibited more pessimistic prior beliefs (relative to BD- and HC) and reduced loss aversion (relative to HC) during risk-taking on the BART. Traditional measures of risk-taking on the BART (adjusted pumps, total points, total pops) detected no group differences. These findings suggest that reduced behavioral consistency is a crucial feature of risky decision-making in BD and that SUD history in BD may signal additional trait vulnerabilities for risky behavior even when mood symptoms and substance use are in remission. This study also underscores the value of using mathematical modeling to understand behavior in research on complex disorders like BD.</p>","PeriodicalId":72664,"journal":{"name":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9897236/pdf/nihms-1864043.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with excessive pleasure-seeking risk-taking behaviors that often characterize its clinical presentation. However, the mechanisms of risk-taking behavior are not well-understood in BD. Recent data suggest prior substance use disorder (SUD) in BD may represent certain trait-level vulnerabilities for risky behavior. This study examined the mechanisms of risk-taking and the role of SUD in BD via mathematical modeling of behavior on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Three groups-18 euthymic BD with prior SUD (BD+), 15 euthymic BD without prior SUD (BD-), and 33 healthy comparisons (HC)-completed the BART. We modeled behavior using 4 competing hierarchical Bayesian models, and model comparison results favored the Exponential-Weight Mean-Variance (EWMV) model, which encompasses and delineates five cognitive components of risk-taking: prior belief, learning rate, risk preference, loss aversion, and behavioral consistency. Both BD groups, regardless of SUD history, showed lower behavioral consistency than HC. BD+ exhibited more pessimistic prior beliefs (relative to BD- and HC) and reduced loss aversion (relative to HC) during risk-taking on the BART. Traditional measures of risk-taking on the BART (adjusted pumps, total points, total pops) detected no group differences. These findings suggest that reduced behavioral consistency is a crucial feature of risky decision-making in BD and that SUD history in BD may signal additional trait vulnerabilities for risky behavior even when mood symptoms and substance use are in remission. This study also underscores the value of using mathematical modeling to understand behavior in research on complex disorders like BD.

Abstract Image

躁郁症患者冒险行为的数学建模:有证据表明,有药物使用障碍史者的行为一致性降低,损失规避发生改变。
躁郁症(BD)与过度追求快感的冒险行为有关,这通常是其临床表现的特征。然而,人们对躁狂症患者冒险行为的机制还不甚了解。最近的数据表明,躁狂症患者先前的药物使用障碍(SUD)可能代表了某些特质水平的冒险行为脆弱性。本研究通过对气球模拟风险任务(BART)中的行为进行数学建模,研究了BD中冒险行为的机制和SUD的作用。共有三组人完成了气球模拟风险任务(BART),他们分别是:18 名既往有药物依赖的嗜睡症患者(BD+)、15 名既往无药物依赖的嗜睡症患者(BD-)和 33 名健康对比组(HC)。我们使用 4 个相互竞争的分层贝叶斯模型对行为进行建模,模型比较结果倾向于指数-权重均方差模型(EWMV),该模型包含并划分了风险承担的五个认知成分:先验信念、学习率、风险偏好、损失规避和行为一致性。两个 BD 组,无论是否有药物滥用史,其行为一致性均低于 HC 组。在 BART 风险承担过程中,BD+ 组表现出更悲观的先验信念(相对于 BD- 组和 HC 组)和更低的损失规避(相对于 HC 组)。BART 风险承担的传统测量方法(调整泵、总分、总分)未发现任何群体差异。这些研究结果表明,行为一致性降低是 BD 风险决策的一个重要特征,即使情绪症状和药物使用得到缓解,BD 的 SUD 史也可能预示着风险行为的额外特质脆弱性。这项研究还强调了在研究 BD 等复杂疾病时使用数学建模来理解行为的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信