Identifying Splitting Through Sentiment Analysis.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Tiziano Colibazzi, Avner Abrami, Barry Stern, Eve Caligor, Eric A Fertuck, Michael Lubin, John Clarkin, Guillermo Cecchi
{"title":"Identifying Splitting Through Sentiment Analysis.","authors":"Tiziano Colibazzi,&nbsp;Avner Abrami,&nbsp;Barry Stern,&nbsp;Eve Caligor,&nbsp;Eric A Fertuck,&nbsp;Michael Lubin,&nbsp;John Clarkin,&nbsp;Guillermo Cecchi","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Kernerg's Object Relations Theory model of personality pathology, splitting, the mutual polarization of aspects of experience, is thought to result in a failure of identity integration. The authors sought to identify a clinician-independent, automated measure of splitting by examining 54 subjects' natural speech. Splitting in these individuals, recruited from the community, was investigated and evaluated with a shortened version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO-R). A type of automated sentiment textual analysis called VADER was applied to transcripts from the section of the STIPO-R that probes identity integration. Higher variability in speech valence, more negative minimum valence, and more frequent shifts in valence polarity were associated with more severe identity disturbance. The authors concluded that the degree of splitting elicited during the description of self and others is related to the degree of identity disturbance, and to the degree of negativity and instability of these descriptions of self and others.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"37 1","pages":"36-48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.36","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Kernerg's Object Relations Theory model of personality pathology, splitting, the mutual polarization of aspects of experience, is thought to result in a failure of identity integration. The authors sought to identify a clinician-independent, automated measure of splitting by examining 54 subjects' natural speech. Splitting in these individuals, recruited from the community, was investigated and evaluated with a shortened version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO-R). A type of automated sentiment textual analysis called VADER was applied to transcripts from the section of the STIPO-R that probes identity integration. Higher variability in speech valence, more negative minimum valence, and more frequent shifts in valence polarity were associated with more severe identity disturbance. The authors concluded that the degree of splitting elicited during the description of self and others is related to the degree of identity disturbance, and to the degree of negativity and instability of these descriptions of self and others.

通过情感分析识别分裂。
在Kernerg的人格病理学客体关系理论模型中,分裂,即经验方面的相互极化,被认为会导致身份整合的失败。作者试图通过检查54名受试者的自然语言来确定一种独立于临床的、自动的分裂测量方法。研究人员从社区中招募了这些人,对他们的分裂进行了调查和评估,并采用了精简版的人格组织结构化访谈(STIPO-R)。一种名为VADER的自动情感文本分析被应用于STIPO-R中探测身份整合的部分的转录本。言语效价变异性越大、最低负效价越高、效价极性变化越频繁,同一性障碍越严重。作者得出结论,在自我和他人描述过程中引发的分裂程度与身份障碍的程度以及这些自我和他人描述的消极性和不稳定性程度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Disorders has long been the only forum devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant personality disorders. The journal fosters dialogue among researchers and practitioners working from a variety of orientations and approaches. Its international impact is well established, with subscribers in over 30 countries. This multidisciplinary journal regularly features: - Research on normal and pathological personality and development - New methodologies for assessing personality - Etiologies and clinical classifications for personality disorders - Epidemiological studies and outcomes research on diagnostic criteria - Treatment techniques and innovations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信