Using phosphate amendments to reduce bioaccessible Pb in contaminated soils: A meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 Q3 SOIL SCIENCE
Manfred M Mayer, Nicholas T Basta, Kirk G Scheckel
{"title":"Using phosphate amendments to reduce bioaccessible Pb in contaminated soils: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Manfred M Mayer,&nbsp;Nicholas T Basta,&nbsp;Kirk G Scheckel","doi":"10.3389/fsoil.2022.1028328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measuring the reduction of <i>in vitro</i> bioaccessible (IVBA) Pb from the addition of phosphate amendments has been researched for more than 20 years. A range of effects have been observed from increases in IVBA Pb to almost 100% reduction. This study determined the mean change in IVBA Pb as a fraction of total Pb (AC) and relative to the IVBA Pb of the control soil (RC) with a random effects meta-analysis. Forty-four studies that investigated the ability of inorganic phosphate amendments to reduce IVBA Pb were identified through 5 databases. These studies were split into 3 groups: primary, secondary, and EPA Method 1340 based on selection criteria, with the primary group being utilized for subgroup analysis and meta-regression. The mean AC was approximately -12% and mean RC was approximately -25% for the primary and secondary groups. For the EPA Method 1340 group, the mean AC was -5% and mean RC was -8%. The results of subgroup analysis identified the phosphorous amendment applied and contamination source as having a significant effect on the AC and RC. Soluble amendments reduce bioaccessible Pb more than insoluble amendments and phosphoric acid is more effective than other phosphate amendments. Urban Pb contamination associated with legacy Pb-paint and tetraethyl Pb from gasoline showed lower reductions than other sources such as shooting ranges and smelting operations. Meta-regression identified high IVBA Pb in the control, low incubated soil pH, and high total Pb with the greater reductions in AC and RC. In order to facilitate comparisons across future remediation research, a set of minimum reported data should be included in published studies and researchers should use standardized <i>in vitro</i> bioaccessibility methods developed for P-treated soils. Additionally, a shared data repository should be created for soil remediation research to enhance available soil property information and better identify unique materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":73107,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in soil science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890325/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in soil science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2022.1028328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Measuring the reduction of in vitro bioaccessible (IVBA) Pb from the addition of phosphate amendments has been researched for more than 20 years. A range of effects have been observed from increases in IVBA Pb to almost 100% reduction. This study determined the mean change in IVBA Pb as a fraction of total Pb (AC) and relative to the IVBA Pb of the control soil (RC) with a random effects meta-analysis. Forty-four studies that investigated the ability of inorganic phosphate amendments to reduce IVBA Pb were identified through 5 databases. These studies were split into 3 groups: primary, secondary, and EPA Method 1340 based on selection criteria, with the primary group being utilized for subgroup analysis and meta-regression. The mean AC was approximately -12% and mean RC was approximately -25% for the primary and secondary groups. For the EPA Method 1340 group, the mean AC was -5% and mean RC was -8%. The results of subgroup analysis identified the phosphorous amendment applied and contamination source as having a significant effect on the AC and RC. Soluble amendments reduce bioaccessible Pb more than insoluble amendments and phosphoric acid is more effective than other phosphate amendments. Urban Pb contamination associated with legacy Pb-paint and tetraethyl Pb from gasoline showed lower reductions than other sources such as shooting ranges and smelting operations. Meta-regression identified high IVBA Pb in the control, low incubated soil pH, and high total Pb with the greater reductions in AC and RC. In order to facilitate comparisons across future remediation research, a set of minimum reported data should be included in published studies and researchers should use standardized in vitro bioaccessibility methods developed for P-treated soils. Additionally, a shared data repository should be created for soil remediation research to enhance available soil property information and better identify unique materials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用磷酸盐改进剂降低污染土壤中生物可及性铅:一项荟萃分析。
测定体外生物可及性铅(IVBA)在添加磷酸修饰剂后的减少量已经进行了20多年的研究。已观察到一系列影响,从IVBA铅的增加到几乎100%的减少。本研究采用随机效应荟萃分析方法确定了土壤中IVBA Pb占总Pb (AC)的平均变化以及相对于对照土壤(RC)的平均变化。通过5个数据库鉴定了44个研究无机磷酸盐改改剂降低IVBA Pb能力的研究。根据选择标准将这些研究分为3组:第一组、第二组和EPA方法1340,其中第一组用于亚组分析和meta回归。主要组和次要组的平均AC约为-12%,平均RC约为-25%。EPA Method 1340组的平均AC为-5%,平均RC为-8%。亚群分析结果表明,施用的磷改进剂和污染源对AC和RC有显著影响。可溶性改进剂比不溶性改进剂更能降低生物可达性铅,磷酸比其他磷酸盐改进剂更有效。与传统的铅涂料和汽油中的四乙基铅有关的城市铅污染的减少幅度低于射击场和冶炼作业等其他来源。meta回归分析表明,对照土壤中IVBA Pb含量较高,孵育土壤pH值较低,总Pb含量较高,AC和RC降低幅度较大。为了便于在未来的修复研究中进行比较,发表的研究应包括一组最低限度的报告数据,研究人员应使用为磷处理土壤开发的标准化体外生物可及性方法。此外,应该为土壤修复研究创建一个共享的数据存储库,以增强可用的土壤属性信息,更好地识别独特的材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信