Antiviral Drugs and Vaccines for Omicron Variant: A Focused Review.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Nidhi Garg, Ananya Sree Kunamneni, Pankaj Garg, Sandeep Sharma, Divakar Sharma, Adinarayana Kunamneni
{"title":"Antiviral Drugs and Vaccines for Omicron Variant: A Focused Review.","authors":"Nidhi Garg,&nbsp;Ananya Sree Kunamneni,&nbsp;Pankaj Garg,&nbsp;Sandeep Sharma,&nbsp;Divakar Sharma,&nbsp;Adinarayana Kunamneni","doi":"10.1155/2023/6695533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Omicron variant of concern (VOC) replaced the delta variant rapidly and became the predominant strain due to more mutations in spike protein and receptor-binding domain (RBD) enhancing its infectivity and binding affinity. The severity of the illness is less than that of the delta variant. Omicron is nonsusceptible to REGEN-COV™ and bamlanivimab with etesevimab. Drugs that are effective against the Omicron variant are oral antiviral drugs such as Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir), remdesivir, sotrovimab, and molnupiravir. The potency of sotrovimab is reduced to 3-fold against Omicron, and 8-fold reduction in potency with sotrovimab is found in a particular variant of Omicron with a R346K substitution in spike protein. There are neither clinical trials comparing the efficacy of these 4 therapies with each other nor any data on a combination of two or more therapies. The current recommendation for mild-moderate, nonhospitalized patients who are at a high risk of disease progression is to use Paxlovid as the first-line option. If Paxlovid is not available or cannot be administered due to drug interactions, then the next best choice is sotrovimab. The third choice is remdesivir if sotrovimab is also not available and molnupiravir is to be given if the other three options are not available or cannot be administered. For prevention, 2130 (cilgavimab) in combination with COV2-2196 (tixagevimab) has been effective against BA.2 only. LY-CoV1404 (bebtelovimab) is recently authorized as it is effective against all sublineages of the Omicron variant. Regarding vaccine efficacy (VE), the 3-dose VE with mRNA vaccines at 14-60 days was found to be 71.6%, and after 60 days, it is 47.4%. There is a 34-38-fold reduction of neutralizing activity with prebooster sera and a 19-fold reduction with booster sera for the Omicron variant. This probably explains the reason for worldwide breakthrough infections with the Omicron variant with waning immunity. The neutralizing antibody response against Omicron elicited by the bivalent vaccine is superior to that of the ancestral Wuhan strain, without any safety concerns. For future advances, the ribosome display technology can be applied for the generation of human single-chain fragment variable (scFv) antibodies from B cells of recovered patients against Omicron and other Coronavirus variants as they are easier and faster to produce and have high affinity and high specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50715,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","volume":"2023 ","pages":"6695533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504046/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6695533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Omicron variant of concern (VOC) replaced the delta variant rapidly and became the predominant strain due to more mutations in spike protein and receptor-binding domain (RBD) enhancing its infectivity and binding affinity. The severity of the illness is less than that of the delta variant. Omicron is nonsusceptible to REGEN-COV™ and bamlanivimab with etesevimab. Drugs that are effective against the Omicron variant are oral antiviral drugs such as Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir), remdesivir, sotrovimab, and molnupiravir. The potency of sotrovimab is reduced to 3-fold against Omicron, and 8-fold reduction in potency with sotrovimab is found in a particular variant of Omicron with a R346K substitution in spike protein. There are neither clinical trials comparing the efficacy of these 4 therapies with each other nor any data on a combination of two or more therapies. The current recommendation for mild-moderate, nonhospitalized patients who are at a high risk of disease progression is to use Paxlovid as the first-line option. If Paxlovid is not available or cannot be administered due to drug interactions, then the next best choice is sotrovimab. The third choice is remdesivir if sotrovimab is also not available and molnupiravir is to be given if the other three options are not available or cannot be administered. For prevention, 2130 (cilgavimab) in combination with COV2-2196 (tixagevimab) has been effective against BA.2 only. LY-CoV1404 (bebtelovimab) is recently authorized as it is effective against all sublineages of the Omicron variant. Regarding vaccine efficacy (VE), the 3-dose VE with mRNA vaccines at 14-60 days was found to be 71.6%, and after 60 days, it is 47.4%. There is a 34-38-fold reduction of neutralizing activity with prebooster sera and a 19-fold reduction with booster sera for the Omicron variant. This probably explains the reason for worldwide breakthrough infections with the Omicron variant with waning immunity. The neutralizing antibody response against Omicron elicited by the bivalent vaccine is superior to that of the ancestral Wuhan strain, without any safety concerns. For future advances, the ribosome display technology can be applied for the generation of human single-chain fragment variable (scFv) antibodies from B cells of recovered patients against Omicron and other Coronavirus variants as they are easier and faster to produce and have high affinity and high specificity.

针对奥密克戎变异株的抗病毒药物和疫苗:重点综述。
令人担忧的奥密克戎变异株(VOC)迅速取代了德尔塔变异株,并成为主要毒株,因为刺突蛋白和受体结合域(RBD)的更多突变增强了其传染性和结合亲和力。这种疾病的严重程度低于德尔塔变异株。奥密克戎对REGEN-COV不敏感™ 以及bamlanivimab和etesevimab。对奥密克戎变异株有效的药物是口服抗病毒药物,如奈玛特韦片/利托那韦片组合包装(尼马特雷韦/利托那韦)、瑞德西韦、索特罗维单抗和莫努匹拉韦。索特罗维单抗对奥密克戎的效力降低到3倍,在刺突蛋白中有R346K取代的奥密克戎的特定变体中发现索特罗维单抗的效力降低了8倍。既没有将这4种疗法的疗效相互比较的临床试验,也没有任何关于两种或多种疗法组合的数据。对于疾病进展风险高的轻度-中度非住院患者,目前的建议是使用奈玛特韦片/利托那韦片组合包装作为一线选择。如果奈玛特韦片/利托那韦片组合包装不可用或因药物相互作用而无法给药,那么下一个最佳选择是索他韦单抗。如果sotrovimab也不可用,第三种选择是瑞德西韦;如果其他三种选择不可用或无法给药,则给予莫努匹拉韦。对于预防,2130(cilgavimab)与COV2-2196(tixagevimab)联合使用仅对BA.2有效。LY-CoV1404(bebtelovimab)最近获得授权,因为它对奥密克戎变异株的所有亚系都有效。关于疫苗效力(VE),在14-60时使用信使核糖核酸疫苗的3剂VE 天数为71.6%,60天后 天,为47.4%。奥密克戎变异株的预加强血清中和活性降低了34-38倍,加强血清中和活力降低了19倍。这可能解释了全球突破性感染奥密克戎变异株并导致免疫力下降的原因。二价疫苗引发的针对奥密克戎的中和抗体反应优于祖先武汉毒株,没有任何安全问题。对于未来的进展,核糖体展示技术可以应用于从康复患者的B细胞中产生针对奥密克戎和其他冠状病毒变体的人类单链片段可变(scFv)抗体,因为它们更容易、更快地产生,并且具有高亲和力和高特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin. The journal welcomes articles describing research on pathogenesis, epidemiology of infection, diagnosis and treatment, antibiotics and resistance, and immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信