The Conditional Analysis of the Agentive Modals: a Reply to Mandelkern et al.

Philosophia (Ramat-Gan, Israel) Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-22 DOI:10.1007/s11406-023-00664-7
Simon Kittle
{"title":"The Conditional Analysis of the Agentive Modals: a Reply to Mandelkern et al.","authors":"Simon Kittle","doi":"10.1007/s11406-023-00664-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A proper understanding of agentive modals promises to clarify issues to do with free will, know how, and other philosophically interesting topics. In this paper I identify one constraint on, and one structural feature of, trying-based versions of the conditional analysis of the agentive modals. I suggest that the constraint and structural feature together provide a novel account of why the famous Lehrer-Chisholm objection to conditional analyses of ability modals is so powerful. I argue that Mandelkern et al.'s 'Agentive Modals' (<i>Philosophical Review,</i> <i>126/3</i>, 301-343, 2017) conditional analysis of the agentive modals fails to avoid this problem. I also identify two further problems for their account. I close by summarising a number of criteria which any successful semantic analysis of the agentive modals should satisfy.</p>","PeriodicalId":74436,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia (Ramat-Gan, Israel)","volume":"51 4","pages":"2117-2138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia (Ramat-Gan, Israel)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-023-00664-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A proper understanding of agentive modals promises to clarify issues to do with free will, know how, and other philosophically interesting topics. In this paper I identify one constraint on, and one structural feature of, trying-based versions of the conditional analysis of the agentive modals. I suggest that the constraint and structural feature together provide a novel account of why the famous Lehrer-Chisholm objection to conditional analyses of ability modals is so powerful. I argue that Mandelkern et al.'s 'Agentive Modals' (Philosophical Review, 126/3, 301-343, 2017) conditional analysis of the agentive modals fails to avoid this problem. I also identify two further problems for their account. I close by summarising a number of criteria which any successful semantic analysis of the agentive modals should satisfy.

代理情态的条件分析:对 Mandelkern 等人的答复》(The Conditional Analysis of the Agentive Modals: a Reply to Mandelkern et al.
正确理解代理模态有望澄清与自由意志、"知道如何 "以及其他哲学上有趣的话题有关的问题。在本文中,我指出了基于尝试的代理模态条件分析版本的一个限制条件和一个结构特征。我认为,约束和结构特征共同提供了一个新颖的解释,说明了为什么著名的莱勒-奇肖尔姆反对能力情态的条件分析如此有力。我认为,曼德尔克恩等人的 "能动模态"(《哲学评论》,126/3,301-343,2017 年)对能动模态的条件分析未能避免这一问题。我还指出了他们的论述存在的另外两个问题。最后,我总结了任何成功的语义分析都应满足的一些标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信