Risk of Immune-Related Pneumonitis with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Different Cancer Types and Treatment Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 22 Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Lei Han, Guangxin Li, Huihui Li, Lei Zhao
{"title":"Risk of Immune-Related Pneumonitis with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Different Cancer Types and Treatment Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 22 Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Lei Han,&nbsp;Guangxin Li,&nbsp;Huihui Li,&nbsp;Lei Zhao","doi":"10.1159/000523904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pneumonitis, the specific toxicity associated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, is severe and potentially life-threatening, and its incidence and severity are poorly understood among different tumor types or treatment methods. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the incidence and severity of pneumonitis among different tumor types and treatment regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and Embase were retrieved until September 2021. Meta-analysis of the risk of pneumonitis was calculated using a fixed-effect model. Pooled analysis of the incidence of pneumonitis in different tumor types was performed using a metaprop function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 10,700) were included for pool analysis, and eighteen RCTs (n = 8,852) were eligible for meta-analysis. For all-grade pneumonitis, the risk of the combination therapy (PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitor) was 3.62 times significantly higher than that of monotherapy, and 4.06 and 1.78 times significantly higher than that of chemotherapy and placebo than monotherapy. The incidence of pneumonitis was not significantly different between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor versus ipilimumab or between low doses versus high doses. For high-grade (grade ≥3) pneumonitis, the risk in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone was 3.62 times significantly higher than chemotherapy. No significant difference was found in the incidence of pneumonitis between combination versus monotherapy, monotherapy versus placebo, combination versus ipilimumab alone, monotherapy versus ipilimumab alone, or low doses versus high doses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy may cause more treatment-related pneumonitis. Increasing the dose of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor does not significantly increase the incidence of pneumonitis. Compared with the monotherapy, combination therapy does not increase the incidence of pneumonitis significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000523904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pneumonitis, the specific toxicity associated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, is severe and potentially life-threatening, and its incidence and severity are poorly understood among different tumor types or treatment methods. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the incidence and severity of pneumonitis among different tumor types and treatment regimens.

Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were retrieved until September 2021. Meta-analysis of the risk of pneumonitis was calculated using a fixed-effect model. Pooled analysis of the incidence of pneumonitis in different tumor types was performed using a metaprop function.

Results: Twenty two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 10,700) were included for pool analysis, and eighteen RCTs (n = 8,852) were eligible for meta-analysis. For all-grade pneumonitis, the risk of the combination therapy (PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitor) was 3.62 times significantly higher than that of monotherapy, and 4.06 and 1.78 times significantly higher than that of chemotherapy and placebo than monotherapy. The incidence of pneumonitis was not significantly different between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor versus ipilimumab or between low doses versus high doses. For high-grade (grade ≥3) pneumonitis, the risk in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone was 3.62 times significantly higher than chemotherapy. No significant difference was found in the incidence of pneumonitis between combination versus monotherapy, monotherapy versus placebo, combination versus ipilimumab alone, monotherapy versus ipilimumab alone, or low doses versus high doses.

Conclusions: Compared with chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy may cause more treatment-related pneumonitis. Increasing the dose of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor does not significantly increase the incidence of pneumonitis. Compared with the monotherapy, combination therapy does not increase the incidence of pneumonitis significantly.

PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在不同癌症类型和治疗方案中的免疫相关性肺炎风险:22项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
背景:与PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂相关的肺炎的特异性毒性是严重的,可能危及生命,其发病率和严重程度在不同的肿瘤类型或治疗方法中知之甚少。本荟萃分析比较了不同肿瘤类型和治疗方案中肺炎的发病率和严重程度。方法:MEDLINE和Embase检索至2021年9月。使用固定效应模型计算肺炎风险的荟萃分析。使用meta - prop函数对不同肿瘤类型的肺炎发病率进行了汇总分析。结果:纳入22项随机对照试验(rct) (n = 10,700)进行池分析,18项随机对照试验(n = 8,852)符合meta分析。对于所有级别的肺炎,联合治疗(PD-1/PD-L1 + CTLA-4抑制剂)的风险是单药治疗的3.62倍,是化疗和安慰剂治疗的4.06倍和1.78倍。肺炎的发病率在PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂与伊匹单抗或低剂量与高剂量之间无显著差异。对于高级别(≥3级)肺炎,单独使用PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂的风险是化疗的3.62倍。联合治疗与单药治疗、单药治疗与安慰剂、联合治疗与单用伊匹单抗、单药治疗与单用伊匹单抗、低剂量与高剂量之间的肺炎发病率无显著差异。结论:与化疗相比,PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂单药治疗可能导致更多的治疗相关性肺炎。增加PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂的剂量不会显著增加肺炎的发生率。与单药治疗相比,联合治疗并未显著增加肺炎的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信